TFRide
Preview

Trek Top Fuel for 2025

Reading time

I was at a product launch a couple years ago in Europe, and the bike we were being shown was a capable all-rounder that would please a large market share but probably wasn't going to stoke the flames of passion amongst the ardent consumer base. The French and Belgian scribes were in a huddle, and were muttering something along the lines of "C'est comme un Top Fuel." This was, I suspect, meant to be damning by way of faint praise. I took it the other way - the Top Fuel may not be the bike people dream of owning, but it is the bike that gets shit done, most of the time, most of the places, and it has been getting shit done efficiently and effectively for a very long time.

And now Trek has given the venerable journeybike another makeover, just a couple short years after Cooper reviewed the last one, with an eye toward increased versatility and broader appeal to a wider range of riders. Let's pop the hood.

Evolution over Revolution

Within the materials that Trek sent over along with the bike, the following phrase was repeated on a couple different slides: "Was already pretty dialed. Slight adjustments from previous." While it would be easy to just run with that as the lede, dust my hands with a dramatic flourish, wrap this up with a few supplied studio shots and call it a day, there is more going on than at first meets the eye. But the sentiment is there - this is an evolution, rather than a revolution.

For the TL;DR crowd, the changes can be summed up as follows:

Lighter frame (220g lighter than before), Mino Link (Trek's version of a flip chip) functionality now includes two height/geo positions and two shock leverage positions (making it more akin to Rocky's Ride-4 chip), size-specific chainstay lengths, mullet compatibility, long-stroke shock-ability, greater dropper post insertion, and improved internal frame storage. The head angle slackens a hair, from 66-degrees to 65.5 (in the Mino-low position), but seat angle and reach remain the same as before. Stock travel configuration is 120mm rear, 130mm up front. Suspension is still Trek's ABP, an enhanced single pivot design with the rear axle serving as the pivot between chain and seat stays. There's about 10mm more stack than before. Oh, and the Knock Block is gone. Some may lament that, others may rejoice.

Revolutions Can Get Bloody, Anyway

These mostly evolutionary changes may not look like much when considered one by one, but together they add up to a definite stance shift for the Top Fuel. In the stock configuration, the TF has more travel and more heft than the current crop of flexstay dedicated XC race bikes, and instead goes head to head against bikes like the Santa Cruz Tallboy, Yeti SB120 and Rocky Mountain Element; capable light trail bikes that can handle a surprising amount of terrain but still be called upon to get after it when pinning on numbers or chasing KOMs. The new Mino-Link, mullet compatibility, and longer fork and shock options, however, now allow the Top Fuel to play to a wider audience. Upping the rear travel to 130mm and slapping a 140mm fork on there puts it in the same space that the non-EVO Stumpjumper just vacated, sharing the room with the Mondraker Raze I just reviewed, or the Revel Rascal, or the Transition Smuggler, or the Canyon Neuron CF, or...

At the other end of the spectrum, full-on XC nerds can put the Mino-Link in the high position, slap a 120mm SID on the bike and happily wear nothing but skinsuits for the rest of their days.

Toss in mullet compatibility for more jib-aliciousness, and it becomes apparent that Trek is expecting the Top Fuel to wear a few different hats. Whether this broadened capability comes at the cost of its storied pedaling efficiency remains to be seen. Trek have done a remarkable job in the past of balancing suspension performance and pedaling manners with the Top Fuel, and it has a longstanding and deserved reputation as a stalwart letterman athlete. Hopefully the good bits are all still alive and well.

TFProfile

Stealth...

Evolution At Elevation

Trek sent out a Top Fuel 9.8 GX AXS that has barely had a chance to taste dirt yet. This size Large test rig weighs bang on 30lbs with a set of Shimano XT Trail pedals and retails for 7000 USD (9000 CAD). Riders can get into an aluminum-framed Top Fuel for as little as 2700 USD (3600 CAD), but they'll be carting around an extra 5 pounds of bike at that price. People who want to impress the neighbors can spend 10,500 USD (14,000 CAD) for the XX AXS Top Fuel, and can also strut around confident in the knowledge that they have saved almost a pound of weight over the GX version. Personally, I can think of several ways to hack a pound of weight off the bike without spending three and a half thousand dollars, but that's a conversation for down the line.

Model by model, the Top Fuel is available as follows:

TopFuelPrice

There are a lot of nice touches here. The stock color is one of the more pleasantly understated and cleanly executed finishes I have seen in a long time. I'm a total sucker for the Bontrager RSL integrated bar-stem, even if that means I can't obsess about bar sweep or roll options. The internal cable routing is fully sleeved and incredibly quiet. The frame storage door is easy to use and doesn't rattle (yet), even if the actual downtube volume is not massive. The added ability to futz with not just head/seat angle and bb height, but also play with shock progression AND maybe even long-stroke the bike for more travel is appealing. Everything is cleanly laid out and nicely finished and nothing looks janky.

TFbarStem

I've already outed myself with regard to being like a magpie finding a shiny thing when it comes to one-piece bar-stem setups, so it should come as no surprise that I consider this a total value added feature. YMMV

I'm only a couple rides in, but so far the bike is supremely quiet, the Pike Select+ fork and Deluxe Ultimate RCT shock feel beautifully paired, and nothing sucks. I even love the Bontrager Verse Short saddle and XR Trail grips. The only complaint I can make at this very early point is that the Bontrager Line dropper post looks poised to continue a tradition of less than stellar performance, with a noticeable amount of fore-aft play right off the bat. Ah well, perfection is better considered an aspiration than an expectation. That aside, the new Top Fuel's a very easy bike to get along with. So far. All hail the evolution!

Trek Bikes

Related Stories

Trending on NSMB

Comments

AndyJK
+3 Jotegir Konrad Tehllama42

Nice ride 4.

Reply

cooperquinn
+2 Todd Hellinga Dan

220g lighter frame, 200-something odd gram heavier fork with more travel. 

That's a decent tradeoff. Its also a real looker in that paint!

Reply

Jotegir
+2 Kos Spencer Nelson

For what it's worth, Trek quietly bumped up the front travel to 130mm and prescribed pikes and 34s across the board since your review. So really, this bike gets you back to the weight ranges it was supposed to have on release but with the bigger fork.

However, and this is a big however, the 9.8 model doesn't come with carbon wheels anymore. Gone are the Line 30 carbons in  favour of the Line 30 comps. This is the first year in a while that a 9.8 spec bike hasn't received carbon wheels. I was hoping they'd trade the Line 30 carbons for entry level Kovee carbon rims because they suited the bike a bit more, but this is a.... less favourable trade. Depending on what you want to do with the bike, there's an argument that the less-adjustable, carbon hooped outgoing 130/120mm model is a better value bike at retail. Which IMO is pretty bad.

I personally ran mine in a number of setups, from the stock 120/120 all the way to 140/13-something with a 52.5/55mm stroke Float X and a GRIP2 36, with and without a single offset bushing - so I can confirm you could long-shock the last one, but Trek didn't say you could. The added inherent adjustability certainly is cool for tinkerers like myself without having to resort to stuff like offset bushings and the fair bicycle offset clamp to dial the rest of the geo/fit to where it should be in light of over-suspension-ing.

I'm suitably whelmed by the release but I am certainly not rushing out to pick up a new one after selling the one prior.

Reply

cooperquinn
+1 Jotegir

Interesting running changes - the swap to a Pike isn't a bad one although I'd argue it starts to push the Top Fuel into Fuel territory pretty hard. Agreed that's a bit of a downer on the wheels, I guess that's the mtb equivalent of shrinkflation.... specflation? 

The other note you make that I agree with is, and we're seeing this with a lot of releases these days, but overall it's fairly minor changes.

Reply

Huntero
0

I say this as a Trek fan and someone who has owned the now 2 gens past Top Fuel (120/115 one) but I can't fathom why you would buy this over either the Specialized Epic 8 Expert -- exact same price, but with carbon hoops, a little more XC with SID suspension OR the Rocky Mountain C70 Element which also comes with carbon hoops but the same pike/burlier suspension.

As a brand that makes in-house components and can compete at the scale game as well as anyone taking the carbon hoops off of the 9.8 is a huge bummer to me.

And this thing still can't carry 2 bottles. I'm sure it's a great riding bike but I just can't figure out why you'd choose it over all the other competitive, better spec'ed options unless you get a deal on Trek.

Reply

cooperquinn
+1 Mike Ferrentino

I'm biased - I own one - but the Element is still best in class here for what I like and want to do with a little bike.

BUT, I also can't comment on current value propositions of the various builds, I got mine frame only a couple years ago and have a fully custom build (that's a bit of a moving target, all my suspension will change again next week).

Reply

Huntero
+1 Cooper Quinn

I'm guilty of this same bias as I sold my 2020 Top Fuel and replaced it with the Element! It's going to take alot for me to replace it as I feel like it really hit the sweet spot of "downcountry" geometry, weight, and everything else.

Wouldn't mind throwing some of these Trek RSL bars on it though!

Reply

mikeferrentino
+1 Kos

The Element is a pretty damn amazing bike. It and the SB120 are tied in terms of my favorite "do a ton of things" XC-plus bikes. I give the Yeti the nod in terms of trail manners and suspension behavior, but the Element feels faster pedaling. The Top Fuel has a pretty hefty work order ahead - this travel/capability zone is stacked with good bikes at the moment. Trek probably should have stuck with nicer wheels - downgrading is a telling weight handicap when there are scads of wheels that come in anywhere between 300g to 700g per pair lighter. The Mondraker I just reviewed is a full 2lb lighter, with more travel at either end and an 36 up front. Ouch.

cooperquinn
+1 Mike Ferrentino

2lbs is a lot of lbs when you're down in this weight class.

kos
+2 Jotegir Andy Eunson

Nice intro Mike.

Like Andy, I really like the direction Trek IS going with this: a little lighter, a little better pedaling (AS is up somewhat), etc., etc.. 

Not sure it's enough of a thing to make it worth swapping out from my Gen 3, but probably yes, since I'm old and life is short, and the "just won't shut up" ex-racer in me really thinks he'd like that snappier pedaling.

Am I missing something, or has Trek kind of shown Fox the door lately? Not a huge fan of the 2-position lever on the RS shock (at least I think they have stuck with that).

Reply

alexdi
+1 taprider

So now it's a Fuel? They don't seem to have a traditional 100mm XC bike or even a 120mm downcountry bike in the lineup. Maybe it's a miss or maybe they think most people would rather have this 130mm Top Fuel. At 29 pounds and change for $7000 though, it's a bit of a chonker.

Reply

cooperquinn
+2 Kos Dan

The Supercaliber fills the XC race slot in Trek's lineup.

Reply

alexdi
+1 Timer

Trek seems to think it does. I'd argue that 80mm for modern XC is going the wrong direction.

Reply

kos
+1 Mike Ferrentino

Actually owning a Gen2 Supercaliber, I can tell you that it is the best xcm bike I've ever owned. Even though I've stepped away from racing 50 and 100 milers, it is still fun to have a Ferrari in the quiver!

Reply

andy-eunson
0

I like the direction Trek are going with this. Not quite enough travel for my tastes and skills but I’m liking adjustability to suit a rider. My current Fuel ex is now quite dialed for my body and preferences. I was chatting with the local Trek rep at the LBS the other day and he mentioned a new race hardtail is coming soon. And the lack of colour is nice. I know some dislike a matt black  bike with subtle colour blocks but to me it never looks dated and ugly. I might like a colourful swishy swirly bike for a few minutes but come resale time trendy colours make a bike look dated. Like too much makeup or jewelry on any person.

Reply

Bro-Tato
0

At this point I am not sure I totally understand the Trek mountain bike product lineup, nor its naming conventions. Their stated effort to reduce SKUs does not seem to be paying off, at least not so far.

There seems to be a gap now between the Supercaliber, and this new Top Fuel. And the naming conventions - all the 9.x this and that, EX, EXe, etc.... are just hard to parse.

Reply

Jotegir
+1 surfmtb

They have massively reduced skus in the road side of things with the madone/emonda fusion as well as lots and lots of soft goods and accessories. Burke didn't specifiy it would all come through bikes. 

I dont know if the gap is huge. If you leave this thing stock it's really just about the same as the one before with minor tweaks. Hell, the frame itself is lighter. Somebody on the sharp end of a race like the BCBR is probably doing a custom build regardless of the stock specs and can 120mm it up to their hearts content.  Besides, the supercaliber gained travel so if anything the gap is maintained!

At least they haven't released a bike called the Trek Top Fuel ExE 9.8 AXS.

Reply

surfmtb
0

I'd like to know more about sizing.. curious being 5,9 myself how mike got along with the large instead of the ML..??

Reply

mikeferrentino
0

Sorry for the late reply on this... I got on great with the Large, and am glad I opted for it. I tend toward more length when given the choice these days, it seems. So, 15mm more reach and 17mm more wheelbase seemed preferable to me. I think the reach alone on the ML might leave me, personally, feeling a little cramped with regard to stretching out and breathing.

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.