Schwalbe Magic Mary / Rock Razor Tire Review

Photos Tim Coleman

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last year you know that Enduro(!) racing is the new in thing to do on your weekends. This newfangled form of racing is basically going on a bike ride with your bros and racing just the good bits. The popularity of the sport has spawned a slew of new product but a good chunk of the innovations are excellent for what we’ve always gone and done; ride mountain bikes.

Schwalbe recently came out with two new tires and a new casing. The  tires are the Magic Mary and the Rock Razor and the casing is being called Super Gravity. Both new tires are available in the Super Gravity casing, which in terms of weight and thickness is between their lighter Snake Skin casing and heavier Downhill casing. The Magic Mary/Rock Razor pairing in Super Gravity casing is now a popular Enduro(!) racing combination, but how do they work for us every day mountain biking Joe(y)s?

Photo-1

The test mule in its natural habitat; Norco Range Carbon with a rather downhill focused build

Both tires tested were 27.5 diameter, 2.35” width, Trail Star compound, and Super Gravity casing. Claimed weight for the Magic Mary is 1100 grams and 965 grams for the Rock Razor. I ran these tires tubeless and found the Super Gravity casing stiffer than most other tire manufacturers’ enduro or even DH casings. I inflated to my normal pressures and noticed the tires felt very firm. I let some pressure out to where the trail feel was similar to that of a Maxxis tire and noticed that I was at 4-5 psi less than normal. The tire carcasses were flawless over the test period, even at races like the B.C. Enduro Series event in Kelowna (and at lower than expected tire pressures) where many folks flatted. Over the test period I didn’t have a single flat, cut or burp. Retail price is just under $100 in Canada, which is similar to competing tires from Maxxis, Continental, Michelin and WTB.

Photo-2

The Schwalbe Magic Mary in 2.35” width. Large blocky knobs that are well supported and with sipes in the right directions.

Compound-wise the tested tires used Schwalbe’s Trail Star rubber, which is somewhere between their softest Vert Star mix and the harder Pace Star. I measured the side knobs at an average of 52 A, and the center knobs at an average of 57 A on both the Magic Mary and the Rock Razor. The Trail Star compound offers up faster rolling and better life over the Vert Star, but obviously won’t be as quite as sticky. The tires held up relatively well over the test period, but I did notice that when it got wet the tires moved around more than I’m used to on a Maxxis 3C or Schwalbe Vert Star. Next time I’d choose a Vert Star front and Trail Star rear.

Photo-3

The Schwalbe Rock Razor in 2.35” width. Fast diamond shaped waffle pattern down the centre and Magic Mary-esque side knobs.

The Magic Mary is an aggressive blocky tread with knobs bigger than Ron Jeremy’s, and its performance on the trail was very much what you’d expect; grip monster. While it isn’t a fast rolling tire, I would say I am pleasantly surprised by its speed considering the aggressive tread profile. Grip on loose over hard surfaces was exceptional, with the large knobs finding good purchase in braking and cornering.

When the trail got damp I noticed less grip than I’m used to with 3C Maxxis tires, and that is in large part due to the fact that I was on the medium compound Trail Star variant. The Magic Mary offered great braking traction which is crucial when running a rear tire like the Rock Razor since you’re more dependent on the front tire to get you stopped. In long sweeping corners the Magic Mary side knobs felt well supported and provided ample feedback when traction was running out. My only word of warning is the 2.35” version of the Magic Mary is a large tire. Clearance on my X-Fusion Vengeance was tighter than a 2.4” Maxxis High Roller 2 or any other 2.35” / 2.4” tire I’ve tried.

The Magic Mary after 170 km of use on the front and still fresh as a daisy. Next time I’d use the Vert Star since wear on the front tire appears to be fairly slow.

The Rock Razor is a semi-slick tire with some meaty side knobs. As you’d expect the tire rolls fast at the expense of braking traction. That said, braking on hardpack surfaces is surprisingly good (even in the wet) due to the many small knobs, but as soon as the trail gets loose or steep the braking traction falls off dramatically. I found when riding the Rock Razor (on the rear) I had to be more disciplined with my braking; apply brakes, off brakes, turn bike into corner. If I tried doing a combo of rear brake while turning into a corner the back end would develop a serious case of Tokyo Drift. However once leaned on to the side knob the Razor Rock was equally as impressive as the Magic Mary, and flowing through sweeping turns was a breeze. Degradation-wise the Rock Razor wore slightly faster than a “normal” tire, which makes sense since the knobs are smaller in height to begin with.

Photo-5

Unless it was really soft and soupy the Razor Rock was surprisingly good in the wet

Overall I think the Magic Mary front and Rock Razor rear is an excellent combination for many riders. You get fast rolling tires that make climbs easier and then help maintain ample speed on the trail down. Once on the side knobs, both tires carved through corners with great confidence. For optimal performance I’d recommend a 2.35” Vert Star Magic Mary front and 2.35” Trail Star Razor Rock rear, both in the Super Gravity casing. I was impressed with how durable the Schwalbe Super Gravity casings were considering their weight. While wear on the Magic Mary was surprisingly slow, the Rock Razor lost its edges faster than expected.

Photo-6

The Razor Rock after 240 km and looking rather second hand. I will say the tire still worked better than it looked. It appears all the Tokyo Drift action in testing the limits of these tires has been unkind to the side knobs.

While I think the Magic Mary is an excellent front tire for most folks, the Rock Razor requires some evaluation of your riding style and locale. If you ride somewhere with fast, flowing, shallower grade trails I think you’ll really like this combo. If your usual trails are steep and loose you will be giving up a significant amount of rear braking traction. In which case a Maxxis DHR 2, a Hans Dampf or a second Magic Mary would be a better rear choice. I’ll continue running this combination through the fall, proving that some of these new Enduro(!) products make just regular old mountain bike rides that little bit more fun.


Tried these? Can you handle a rear tire with less grip on the trails you ride?

Trending on NSMB

Comments

shane-bracken
0

Very similar tire is the Bontrager XR4. I've been running it in the back and really like it

Reply

climberbkr
0

I've put a number of rides on the Verstar MM and continue to be impressed. The only time I felt a loss of traction was going over a algae/moss covered rock face in the wet. Otherwise extremely confident inspiring in all conditions. Wet rocks and wood work doesn't phase them at all. I doubt I will get these off my rims without serious effort. Which I guess means they stay on till they wear out. I broke one and seriously stressed a second tire lever. Pumping up tubeless was ridiculously easy. The bead was so tight I didn't have to pump extra to get them to air up. Just lazily aired up with the pump.

Reply

nick
0

I ran a Magic Mary up front this winter. Great traction, but the side knobs are starting to tear off, even though there is loads of tread left. I won't buy them again because of that.

Reply

climberbkr
0

I noticed quite a difference between my Vertstar Magic Mary front and Trailstar Hans Dampf rear. The front is pretty awesome. The rear would slip sideways a bit more then the front. As for draggy feeling I had a personal best climbing Old Buck.

Reply

gregory-griffin
0

I have this set up except for
Trail star compound - snake skin

Works great for trail riding .
While using Magic Marys front and rear very slow pedaling - best traction ever 🙂
My MM side nobs are tearing quickly like nothing I have had before but will continue to buy them .

I am 65 years old .

Reply

kyle-doherty
0

Look at the third pic from the end. Does anyone else see the non-drive side side knobs tearing at the trailing end?

Reply

anon
0

"I measured the side knobs at an average of 52 A, and the center knobs at an average of 57 A"

How do you measure durometer?

Reply

Timmigrant
0

Using a durometer like this:

It uses a spring loaded pin and measures the depth the pin pushes into the rubber with the spring force.

nerd

Reply

boomforeal
0

durometermeter

Reply

Faction
0

endurometer

Reply

boomforeal
0

nah, that measures how much fun you're having on a ride 😉

Reply

aaronmielke
0

Thinking a similar setup from Maxxis-Minion DHF + Ikon-may overcome the Schwalbe's shortcomings as you pointed them out.

Reply

boomforeal
0

the annoying thing about the seemingly smart pairing you suggest is that the ikon and minion use different casings: the 2.35″ ikon is noticeably larger than the 2.3″ minion, so getting that nice big-front/little-back ratio means running 2.5″ meat up front or a pinner 2.2″ out back

i love the ikon but i'm not sure it has that much more braking grip than a rock razor

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.