Öhlins RXF 34 – First Trail Impressions

There has been a great deal of coverage on Öhlins’ first mountain bike fork, from its twin tube damper to the integrated crown race set-up on its one-piece crown steerer, to its conservatively sized 34mm stanchions. It has a very clean appearance from its unapologetic tool-required axle system to the smoothly contoured details of its lowers, and its relatively narrow stance compared to other forks in the aggressive single crown market hide some very unique features. (If you missed our tear down out of the box – click here)

Hard compound tires leave you thankful for all the traction you can get: Öhlins delivers.

The majority of suspension manufacturers use simple to set-up air systems that rely on a single Schrader valve to set sag. Some of the RXF 34’s competitors, like the Fox 36 or 34, RockShox Pike, or BOS DeVille, use self-balancing negative air systems that equalize to your main chamber pressure, while most others rely on a coil negative spring to make their forks initialize subtly. Öhlins uses three chambers in an effort to control spring rate through the entire stroke, and requires the rider to set their positive air chamber pressures separately to control how supple the initial stroke will be.

Air system on the Right. Damper on the Left. Anyone who has ever misted their rotor/pads with oil letting air out of their negative air chamber says thank you. To make their forks initialize subtly, Öhlins uses three chambers in an effort to control spring rate through the entire stroke and requires the rider to set their positive air chamber pressures separately to control how supple they like their initial stroke. The third air chamber, which regulates negative pressure, is self-balancing.

The dual valve set-up required more playing around to dial in some base settings, but in the end I used the main chamber positive range of a rider ~+20lbs heavier than I am, but used my exact weight to establish the pressure in the secondary (bottom) chamber. If you are more of a set-it-once-and-check-it-monthly type, it’s worth noting that it will take a few rides to get the most out of the RXF’s myriad tuning options.

Multi air chamber configuration with valves for positive pressure on top and bottom and a self balancing negative spring. I found it necessary to run the recommended air pressure for a rider ~+20lbs heavier to get proper sag; the fork initialized smoothly no matter how firm it was run.

The most unique feature of the RXF 34 is the damper. Where the Low Speed Compression (LSC) adjuster functions as you would generally expect – providing initial hold and reducing braking influence on the suspension – the High Speed Compression (HSC) adjuster affects fork performance in a way that is quite unique from competing RC2 forks. Where generally your HSC adjuster affects fork performance in situations where the wheel is being accelerated relatively deeply in the suspensions stroke, on Öhlins’ system the HSC adjuster’s function would be better described as a mid-stroke adjuster or ramp up adjuster.

Low Speed Compression on top; High Speed Compression below. Differing notably in function from competing RC2 products, the HSC adjuster on the RXF 34 might be better termed a mid-stroke adjuster.

This proved to be my favourite feature of the fork. Not only do the settings of the HSC adjuster provide an excellent, non-lock-out, climbing platform, they were also useful dialing the fork in for different terrain allowing you to adjust how soon in the travel the mid-stroke support would ramp up without compromising air pressure settings.

The relatively narrow stance of the RXF 34 has no effect of chassis stiffness. The fork is at least as stiff as the RockShox Pike that it replaced.

On the Intense Carbine this adjustment also made it very quick & easy to match the lower leverage ratio and increased support of the short travel 125mm setting or the higher traction, initially softer, DH bike feel of the higher leverage long travel 140mm setting. Yes, it’s ‘just’ 15mm of travel, but if you’ve ridden a Carbine you know how Jekyll/Hyde its two personalities are.

Trying to stay warm on a “Gore-Tex” kind of day with some hard out of the saddle pedaling. The RXF 34 is fluid through its stroke but offers a great deal of support uphill and down.

We were asked quite clearly to compare the Öhlins fork to competing products, which can be very challenging. Firstly, attempting to differentiate between the highest performance suspension products quickly turns into a game of splitting hairs (assuming they are equally well serviced, set-up, etc.). Secondly, to some extent the differences in how a fork is adjusted or feels is going to be a reflection of personal experience or preference.

Armoured trails for rainy days. When traction is at a premium the RXF 34 delivers. So do the awesome trail builders slinging boulders on our local mountains.

With all the caveats out of the way… Riding the RXF 34 will immediately be familiar to those who have any time on BOS’ excellent DeVille fork. It is extremely smooth off the top – no matter how firmly you run the air pressure or damper settings – but not in the unsupported way that an underdamped or much-too-soft air pressure causes a fork to collapse into its travel. From the first little push you can feel the damper supporting you and – in the case of the RXF 34 it depends greatly on your HSC setting – the harder you push into the fork’s very smooth travel the more support you start to feel from the damper. The rebound and LSC settings are both easy to dial in as, despite a broad range of settings, you definitely feel that each click makes a small but consistent change to the fork’s performance.

Fox Float X2 air shock and Ohlins RXF 34 fork played very nicely together. The Intense Carbine offers two very different rides between the 125mm and 140mm travel settings and once your base setting is dialled it takes less than 5 minutes to dial it in one way or the other – including finding your shock pump and allen wrench and opening a beverage.

For fans of the RockShox Solo Air system, the RXF 34’s air system will feel much more linear through its travel if you are running +2 or +3 tokens. In this regard it is similar to Fox’s 36 RC2 in that you will be running less than 20% sag (Öhlins recommends 15%) compared to the 23-25% that you would likely run on a Pike.

Chassis stiffness was obviously on the manufacturer’s mind. Much of their marketing material deals with how it’s possible to engineer a 34mm stanchion chassis to be as stiff as a 35mm or 36mm chassis. The RXF 34 is at least as stiff as the Pike it replaced on the Carbine, and its weight (~2140 grams) puts it firmly in the category of aggressive single crown forks (Pike, 36, DeVille, Metric, etc) none of which I find to be flexy. It was right at home on this stiff carbon frame and high-tension DT Swiss wheels.

The stance of the fork is relatively narrow looking compared to other aggressive single crown forks… but then if you’re looking at that while riding, Mischa the Trail Dog would suggest you have bigger problems.

As I noted in our initial tear down article, quality of both manufacturing and build are high and the feel out of the box was excellent. There has been no deterioration in ride quality after our initial experiences and, as expected, I have had to increase positive air pressure after the initial break-in. One concern that has been discussed is the possibility of wear/corrosion between the steel bearing race and anodized aluminum crown interface but a generous layer of grease was applied and there are no signs of wear to date.

The understated all black Ohlins’ RXF 34 generally goes about life as un-noticed upgrade but for the keen eye of serious bike nerds, or lovers of the gold-logo’s moto rep.

My plan going forward is to the push the Öhlins fork to its ~100hr service interval on a couple of different bikes and to look at any deterioration in performance or wear on the chassis. If you have any specific set-up questions we are more than happy to answer them in the comments below.


Finally – a quick thank you. While the RXF 34’s integrated crown race set-up works with the most commonly spec’d headsets on performance bikes (Cane Creek’s excellent models), it wasn’t immediately compatible with our available test bikes. Jared Walker and Bryden Rigets from OGC (Fox/Intense) stepped up with an Intense Carbine and Fox X2 from their 2016 demo fleet, so I was able to hit the trails right after the tear down with our friends at SuspensionWerx. Thanks guys!


I have a feeling we’ll soon be surrounded by big wheels. How does the RXF look to you?

Trending on NSMB

Comments

boomforeal
0

what's up with the use of (the royal) we?

Reply

drewm
0

Some bad editing on my part; thanks for pointing it out.

Reply

boomforeal
0

my pleasure. and i'm glad that it wasn't an intentional (mis)use of the first person plural. that's one of my biggest pet-peeves in journalism

Reply

teknorob
0

Great review thanks. Just wandered if could the 46 degree offset made any noticeable differences to the steering when compared to current 51 degree flavour of the month for 29ers. I'm riding and evil following in the UK and evil are adamant that 51 degree is best for 29, but having not ridden a 46 on 29er i would be interested to get your thoughts. Thanks, Rob

Reply

drewm
0

Hi Rob,

The rig I have ridden the most over the last couple of years has a 46mm offset Suntour Auron fork, or a 51mm offset PUSHed Fox 34 (both RC2) depending on where in the maintenance rotation I am. The difference in handling is definitely noticeable, but not neccesarily in a positive or negative way.

The 46mm offset requires more body english to negotiate tight steep climbs and you find yourself leaning over aggressively to crank through tight corners… I definitely haven't made/not made any climbs due to the offset but with 51mm it is "easier" to be lazy.

Conversely, I find downhill the reduced offset Auron takes a touch less effort to keep on line, despite the much simpler internals. Again not any faster/slower/more confident/less confident, but it is noticeable.

If you're ripping the shortest possible stays (rear center) like a Specialized Enduro the reduced offset would add a touch of stability. If you're riding a bike with a relatively long rear center the increased offset may be favourable to you. That said, 5-mins into a ride if you're thinking about fork offset you need to focus on the forest!

I definitely wouldn't buy/not buy a fork just because of a few mm of offset.

Hope that helps!

Reply

teknorob
0

Thanks for feedback. I think my question is sadly indicative of how long i spend away on work reading the internet pondering hypothetical tweaks to my bike and not riding it. The 51 degree pike with an extra token works pretty flawlessly on the Following, but i have a set of Bos devilles i love on my 650b liteville which i ride less often but each time i do i come off it thinking what if they made a 29″ version. It sounds from your review like there are some similarities between the devilles and rxf and i look forward to hearing how they go in the long term and i look forward even more to being 5 minutes in to my next ride! 🙂

Reply

drewm
0

Build quality, elite motor sports heritage, smooth feel, damper support, stiff chassis based around 34mm stanchions -- the DeVille and RXF have a lot in common for sure.

It seems crazy to me that there is no 29'er DeVille offering, but as a company that is very focused on the clock watching side of performance mountain biking you have to admit the only arena where 29'ers are dominant is XC racing.

Still…

Reply

boomforeal
0

"Fox 34 RC2"

wait, what?

Reply

drewm
0

"PUSHed Fox 34": PUSH MX damper upgrade replaces stock RLC/CTD/FIT4 parts in a Fox 34 damper assembly with a PUSH top end that has LSC/HSC adjustment. RC2 = Rebound / HSC / LSC.

Reply

boomforeal
0

re. offset, that has been my sense/understanding as well: shorter stays would benefit from less, longer stays would benefit from more. sounds live evil is advising a higher-offset fork for their short-chainstay 29er though; i guess 29er chainstays are always going to be "longer" from a certain perspective

Reply

boomforeal
0

aha, thx!

Reply

drewm
0

I suppose at some point even with a very short rear center, as you say for a 29'er, the combination of a long top tube, low bottom bracket, and slack head angle make the bike so "long & low" that the increased offset is offering handling benefits on flat ground and climbing but the bike is going to rip downhill no matter what the offset is?

Fork lowers are quite expensive to tool for and, even if a fork company chooses to change their offsets via the crown steerer assembly, the cost associated in supporting more SKUs has limited us to a couple of options, but it would be interesting to see (Jones-esque to an extent) what designers would spec if fork offset was open to them as part of their bike design process.

Just as an example, when Cannondale went to ~69.5-degree headangles on their XC Race hardtails (vs. ~71-degree) they also increased the offset on their Lefty race forks to 55mm. Feedback from people who have ridden both (~71-degree @ ~45mm offset VS. ~69.5-degree @ ~55mm offset) is the new bikes are way more "fun" and both more stable and quicker handling. Maybe that isn't relative to the steeper terrain and the <67-degree (static) headangles that I see on hardtails on the Shore but it does make me curious how much offset a company like Evil would design their bikes around if it was an open choice vs. the 51mm that was settled on for "long travel" 29'ers when the Fox 34 came out in 2012 when the bikes were no where near as slack in general as they are now.

Reply

moraucf
0

Interesting to see the airspring ends up having the same setup as the manitou mattoc/dorado with the IRT kit.

Reply

matthew
0

Great review, Andrew! I've been looking forward to hearing an honest real- world review of the RXF, and you covered a lot. Just one comment, though, and it's a little nit-picky. I only feel the need to say something because it seems to be such a common misconception in the bike world. You describe your wheels as being stiff because they are high-tension, but spoke tension doesn't affect wheel stiffness unless it's too low. In other words, increasing spoke tension on a properly built wheel does not make it stiffer.

Sheldon Brown talks about it here:

Reply

drewm
0

Hi Matthew,

Thank You!

I don't think that's nit-picky (and thanks for the Sheldon Brown link -- I wish I saw more reminders of his contributions to the understanding of cycling). It would have been muh clearer for me to say "the DT Swiss wheels system that was spec'd on the bike is very stiff, laterally and torsionally, and part of its design is to run direct pull spokes at fairly high tension."

Speaking of nit picking:

As an, potentially interesting, aside: when I switched from Stan's Flow rims to Stan's Flow EX rims, with their thicker spoke bed and much higher tension, on my singlespeed I immediately noticed a difference in the torsional stiffness (wind up) when cranking on the pedals, that compared quite favourably to an ENVE wheel I had been running, but without any difference from the original Flow in terms of comfort on the trail (where the ENVE was quite harsh -- keep in mind this is on a hardtail bike).

The low spoke count Mavic Crossmax XL I currently have for a long term test, again speaking of riding a hardtail specifically, takes this a step further. The drive side is radially laced Mavic alloy spokes and the wheel is torsionally very stiff with limited wind up standing on the pedals and accelerating uphill from nothing; however, the wheel is notably more flexible/comfortable over a long day (comparing properly tensioned wheels) compared to the 32h Flow EX I generally run.

Reply

drewm
0

Jerry, are you specifically talking about Canada or is it a general comment?

I haven't heard anything about shortages of TTX parts; however, I've heard the same grumblings about peak season turn around times on service/warranty in Canada (Specialized Canada is the authorized warranty and service center for Canada) last summer that you may be referring to?

Ohlins USA is supporting the product directly in the USA, in addition to Specialized USA, and their reputation for supporting products (parts and turn around) is very good.

I have no insider information but I imagine with the large, and growing, amount of Ohlins product coming OE on top spec Specialized bikes that Specialized Canada will either invest significantly in improving the after sales service/warranty experience or open up additional authorized service centers (service and warranty centers?) in Canada to match the strong support in the US.

For example, FanatykCo in Whistler is a strong Specialized Canada partner and I would be surprised if they did not have an aggressive Ohlins support program this season.

Reply

thehippy
0

Thanks for the Great review Drew! Will shops like Suspension Werx be servicing these forks eventually? The question of reasonable service turn around time could affect my decision to purchase this fork.

Reply

drewm
0

Thanks Hippy!

I will say, firstly, that with its self-contained cartridge air system and sealed in leg damper the Ohlins fork is among the simplest on market in terms of performing a basic re-lube or seal change (SKF's excellent low friction deals are available from a variety of sources if you can't find the Ohlins ones). For basic services your competent local shop will have you covered if you don't have the space/time/interest to drop the lowers.

In terms of factory service providers other than Specialized Canada, again assuming you're asking about Canada as Ohlins has you well covered in the USA and Europe, I haven't heard anything yet but I'm going to find out. Just beat with me!

Reply

drewm
0

Hi Hippy,

Apologies for the delayed response. I've communicated with both Ohlins and Specialized Canada. Both were quick to respond but at this point are playing things tight and will only say ~ "Specialized Canada is providing service and warranty support for Ohlins products in Canada."

I will follow up with them again when we are ready for our ~100hr service re. updates on third party service centers and what plans Specialized Canada may have to expand their service offerings.

The forks are very straight forward in terms of doing basic re-lube/seals but definitely I've seen a lot of inquiries re. full service of the product in Canada.

I'm sorry I couldn't get you a more interesting/definitive answer!

Reply

Jerry-Rig
0

How easy will it be able to get replacement parts? Apparently TTX parts are hard to get.

Reply

drewm
0

Hi Jerry,

I answered your post, but a little OT resulted in it showing as a new post instead of a response.

As an aside, the -- 15mm -- bolt-on axle system on this fork paired with a well designed set of lowers and a non-anorexic upper assembly makes for a stiff chassis. I would go as far as to say that even Jerry 20-mill-ows could come to terms with the fact that bigger (stanchions or axle) doesn't mean stiffer after a few rides on one of these forks.

Hopefully your friends at Specialized can get you a test ride on the 650b model once it is released.

Reply

bristecom
0

Awesome! That gave me a pretty good idea of how it works. I just ordered one for my Enduro 29! I've been hoping and waiting for Ohlins to make a TTX fork for quite some time, and now that time has finally come and it looks like it won't disappoint! 🙂

Reply

drewm
0

It's an awesome riding fork; as I noted in the initial tear-down the initial quality of assembly was excellent, so your fork should feel great right out of the box. What shock are you running in your Enduro 29?

Reply

bristecom
0

I actually went full Ohlins and got the TTX rear coil shock for it! I'm hoping it will match the character of the rear well. I know it's cliche but does the RXF feel more "coily" to you? You said it's more linear so I'm assuming it can be made so?

Reply

drewm
0

The fork is perfectly supple off the top and definitely -- as much as any air fork I have ridden with the possible exception of the Fox 40 Float -- between being able to adjust the two positive air chambers separately, as well as the way the damper engages (HSC), you will be able to dial it in to match any air shock or coil shock on the market.

I have ridden it with the Monarch Plus, Fox Float X2, and the PUSH 11-6 coil shock -- which all perform very differently -- and minor air pressure changes combined with the ability to adjust how the mid-stroke support engages made it very easy to balance the front and rear suspension regardless of the shock I was using.

Reply

bristecom
0

Great to hear. Thank you very much for the info!

Reply

GladePlayboy
0

looks promising…. thx for the mini-review….

Reply

drewm
0

Thanks Rob! Looking forward to reporting back once I have 100hrs+ on the fork.

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.