Deniz_merdano_propain_spindrift_Tim_Whistler.width-1920
Ridden and Reviewed

Mavic EX1028 Rims on Hope Pro5 Hubs

Photos Deniz Merdano
Reading time

Mavic EX1028 Rims:

The EX 1028 is tMavic's latest gravity rim, and they claim it's the strongest and most durable rim profile ever created. That is a bold statement. The EX1028 is a 28 mm internal width rim that comes in 27.5" (580 grams) and 29" (620 grams) diameters. Both 28 and 32 hole versions are available. Mavic says the EX1028 is their premium gravity-oriented rim and that it's optimized to the limit of material potential, and . A Mavic EX1028 rim will set you back $185 CDN.

I had the EX1028s laced to the Hope Pro5 hubs reviewed below. My first quirk with the EX1028 was air leaking past the Stan's valve stem I installed. It turns out the deep trough in the rim needs a UST Valve Stem. Luckily I had some CushCore valve stems on hand and they sealed up nicely. Once I figured out the valve stem, the initial installation of tires was relatively easy. However, I went to change a tire some weeks later and then things got fun. I couldn't for the life of me get the tire to reinflate. After a ton of faffing I figured out the rim tape had sagged in the regions where the spoke holes scallop into the rim bead area. Air would escape from those scallops and the tire wouldn't bead. The only solution I could get to work was to inflate the tire with a tube, then pop only the tire bead with the un-scalloped side, remove the tube, reinstall the tire, and reinflate. Maybe more rim tape or thicker rim tape would help with this. Thankfully the laser markings and asymmetry of the rim help with identifying which side bead should be popped off.

Mavic EX1028 rim

The asymmetric spoke hole scallops on the left side made tire inflation difficult after a tire had been inflated on the rim and the rim tape sagged into the spoke holes.

Hope Pro5 Hubs

Hope has been making hubs for eons. The Hope Pro5 builds to increase reliability over the Pro4 and provide higher engagement. This is Hope's highlight feature list for the Pro5:

  • Improved sealing to stop dirt ingress and New Labyrinth seal has zero drag for improved freewheeling performance 
  • New Pawl/Spring design to increase longevity, load capacity & a reduction of drag
  • Increased engagement from 44 to 108 with a new offset 6 pawl freehub design 
  • Wire cut pawls from high-strength steel for maximum strength. 
  • New step-down axle design for a stiffer more durable freehub 
  • New hub body profile for increased stiffness without adding weight 
  • Ebike-specific hub
  • Fully serviceable and rebuildable with simple tools 
  • Available in 24, 28, 32 and 36 hole drillings 
  • Available with all modern freehub bodies 
  • End spacers can be easily swapped to suit different frame and axle standards 
  • 6 bolt or Centrelock disc fitting
  • Available in Black, Silver, Bronze, Red, Blue, Orange & Purple
  • $195 CDN for the front hub, $425 CDN for the rear hub, $178 CDN for freehub bodies ( MS, XD, HG and the e-bike version)
DSC06136

As with all Hope stuff, the Pro5 hubs are quite pretty.

Cost-wise the Hope Pro 5 hub set will set you back $620 CDN. The weight for the front is 187 grams, and the weight for the rear is 425 grams. In comparison to other high-engagement hubs on the market, this is competitive, and the Pro 5 comes in fun colours. After a quick teardown of the hubs and all of the internal components, I observed that everything looks well made and put together. The Pro 5 looks like a better-engineered, and durable product than the existing Pro 4.

Ride Impressions

The wheels were built by a reputable local wheel builder. I installed these on the Norco Range with some fresh Schwalbe tires; Super Gravity Magic Mary Ultrasoft front and Super Gravity Big Betty Soft rear. I like the slightly muted noise from the rear hub. It's a higher engagement hub which I like, but without being obnoxiously loud.

DSC06186

The Mavic EX1028 hoops and Hope Pro5 hubs bolted up to my Norco Range test mule. Essentially a downhill bike that I like pedaling.

After a day riding in the Whistler Bike Park, the rear wheel needed to be re-tensioned and trued. While not ideal, it's a fairly consistent experience for me on any metal rims. Since that initial re-tension of the rear wheel, this has been a durable workhorse wheel set. These wheels have done countless days in the Whistler Bike Park, and been done their fair share of pedaling too. I like high engagement hubs on technical climbs, and when descending. There is a stiffness to the engagement on the Pro 5 hub that I like as well. I've done some severe load testing (accidental send to flat) on the wheels, and both hubs / rims have been ok.

Deniz merdano propain spindrift Tim Whistler 12

I ride a lot of bike park, and like jumping into rock filled corners.

The resulting wheelset feels relatively stiff laterally to me, and I like that. I tend to twist a lot of frames and wheels, and these have felt great through high-load corners. These are a bit heavier than my usual carbon wheelset, and while I notice the additional rotating mass it's not something I've entirely hated either. Particularly in rough bike park-type trails, having some additional mass in the wheels seems to help damp the impacts a bit, even though they feel a bit stiffer.

Deniz merdano propain spindrift Tim Whistler

I mistimed this transfer, landing heavily into an unforgiving rock landing. Woops ... sorry rims!

Looking inside the rear hub, things still look clean. However it has been a fairly dry summer here, and I've lucked out with very few wet days this fall. So I can't comment on the long-term wet weather durability of the Hope Pro 5 just yet. That said, they're made in England, so one would hope (excuse the pun) that wet weather sealing would have been well developed.

Rim wise, there is a small amount of character in the rear wheel, but I've been able to tension it back to relatively straight, and the dents / flat spots are fairly minor. The front rim is still pretty much perfect.

Deniz merdano propain spindrift Tim Whistler 7

I liked the stiffness of this wheel combination and felt comfortable changing directions.

Cash Layout

I was generally impressed with the Mavic EX1028 and Hope Pro5 wheel combination. Cost-wise the rims would be $370 a pair, the hubs would be $620/pair, $36 for valve stems and the build cost me $350 for a total of $1,376.

After Some Abuse

The EX1028 rims are still fairly straight and have proven to be strong gravity-oriented rims. While the front rim is almost perfect, the rear rim has a few minor dents and flat spots. Given the degree of abuse, I'm impressed with the durability of the EX1028 rims. On the downside, I didn't enjoy the extra faf of inflating tires on these rims, or the need for a particular valve stem. If you're the type of rider who prefers metal rims, the EX1028 is a good choice, but I'd prefer to see a 30 mm internal option, and for some of the quirks to be ironed out.

DSC06189

Bolted up, I love the gold!

Final Analysis

The Hope 5 hubs have been great workhorses. They roll fast, and haven't given me any issues. For the price and fun colour options I think these are a great choice for a high engagement hub.

While these have been a good wheelset, much like my impression of the Deemax, I'd personally pay the extra $200-300 for a lighter, lower maintenance, more durable high-quality carbon wheelset. I'd strongly consider the Hope Pro 5 hubs for that wheelset too.

Mavic EX1028 Rims

Hope Pro 5 Hubs

Timmigrant
Tim Coleman

Age: 42

Height: 183 cm / 6'

Weight: 83 kg / 182 lbs

Ape Index: 1.055 / +10 cm

Inseam: 81 cm / 32"

Preferred Riding: Gravity Mountain Bike

Bar Width: 800 mm

Preferred Reach: 500 - 520 mm (but this is stack and head angle dependent)

Related Stories

Trending on NSMB

Comments

NotEndurbro
+5 Fat_Tony_NJ Jonathan Friesen Curveball Jotegir ohio

Spoke nipple holes that go up one side of the center channel are an absolute dealbreaker for me. Reseating with a tube like you did is frustrating and would be completely impractical out on a ride. I have some old Bontrager rims that I repurposed for my gravel bike that have this issue. Every time I replace a tire I end up having to retape the rim. Looking at the profile on this rim, there's no reason that the center channel needs to be so narrow.

Reply

Timmigrant
+1 ohio

Yeah, it seems like a design flaw to me that makes changing tires even more painful!

Reply

Curveball
0

I think it would make taping/re-taping a serious chore. If it led to a tape failure out on the trail, I'd be beyond pissed off.

Reply

Lynx
0

I've used/built rims like this for YEARS and have never had an issue - i25, i29 and i35 WTB Asym rims laced to Pro4 hubs, DT Swiss Comp spokes and sometimes allow, sometimes brass nipples, you just need to work out and remember which side goes on the easiest, then seat the hard side first with a tube, remove tube and seat easy side - it's the greater offset one as angle is shallower, I think, always am forgetting.

Reply

ohio
0

I guess it's doable - but it is a lot of extra work every time I want/have to change tires vs a typical tire change. AND it seems completely unnecessary -  Reserve, Stans, Raceface (and I'm sure others) make aluminum offset rims where the scallop doesn't extend all the way to the inner lip.

Combined with a 28mm inner width, a beastly weight, and premium pricing, it just seems like Mavic can't catch up with the times and hasn't learned their lesson after multiple fire sales and bankruptcies.

Reply

Jotegir
0

I guess with Bontrager you're supposed to use the plastic one piece tape that makes mounting DH/DD tires difficult and cushcore borderline impossible. Sure cuts down on the re-taping jobs though!

Reply

ackshunW
+1 Deniz Merdano

Awesome title picture! I’d be worried you were still in free-fall off that mountain… but you wrote the article, you must be alright.

Reply

Lynx
0

Hey Tim, curious if you also have ridden the Pro4s a lot (you seem to elude to that) and how they compare to the Pro5s? I'm asking as I'm basically a strictly Hope hub guy, to me they offer excellent value for what you get, have long after purchase parts availability and they come in a variety of colour options. If as Hope claims they do in fact roll better than the Pro4s (less drag) that'd be awesome because yeah, I do find that the Pro4 and earlier don't spin on quite as good as some other hubs.

To the wheels/wheel build, I know we don't have a bike park here to easily thrash stuff, but we've some fairly hard descents and some fairly hefty guys and I've never needed to "re-tension" a set of wheels after initial "break in", I think when/if that happens that just means that the builder didn't properly tension and destress the wheels before they gave them to you, just my humble opinion.

Reply

Timmigrant
+1 Lynx .

I haven't spent a ton of time on the Pro 4 hubs. What I can say is that our ride crew is hard on hubs, with all of us having failures on Industry Nine Hydra and Hope Pro 4 hubs (although I haven't run the Pro 4 hubs myself). I haven't had an issue with the Pro 5 yet, which seems like a great step forward. Both hubs still spin freely. I don't have a comparable Pro 4 to compare against, but the rolling drag on these Pro 5s does seem low in comparison to other hubs I've run. 

Regarding retensioning the wheel, I probably put more load than most through a set of wheels, so maybe my experience of needing to retention wheels is a bit unfair. For context though, I'm hard pressed to think of a metal rim I haven't had to retention after a few days of riding. Whether coming rebuilt from a manufacturer, or custom built by a reputable local wheel builder. When I first started riding carbon rims it seemed incredible that I went months without retensioning the rear wheel.

Reply

Lynx
0

Tim, thanks for the reply. Looking forward to when I can justify it to try a new Pro5 rear and compare to my Pro 4 and Pro2s, but right now I've got 5 sets of wheels built on Hope hubs and they're not any worse for wear compared to when they were new.

There are guys who weigh less than you and destroy stuff and guys who weigh more than you by a bit and don't, I guess how you ride, charge, don't, pick lines or not plays a big role. Totally agree on most carbon rims, they're super easy to build, seems like the spokes are just there to hold the hub to the rim, but they still need to be built properly and have all the stresses removed before you ride them.

Reply

morgan-heater
0

The only thing I've ever broken on a Hope hub is the free-hub body (shattered under heavy load). I've broken axles on pretty much everything else, except, actually one of the newer Raceface hubs. Hopes are super easy to work on, which I really like.

Reply

rotorburn
0

"all of us having failures on Industry Nine Hydra and Hope Pro 4 hubs" - I've had terrible luck with i9 and Hope myself (not the Pro5 though). When you look into the mechanical engineering of these hubs it becomes obvious why. The Peak Torque channel sums it up better than I can: https://youtu.be/qO6DUSKhbRU?t=219

If I was looking to save money, I'd rather put my money towards one of: Tarin, DT Swiss or the new OneUp. Otherwise I've found Chris King has treated me well, but I'd never pay full price for a new one.

For retensioning, I find that is greatly dependent on how the wheel builder built the wheel. If they spent time to take the twist out of the spokes, strongly pre-stress the mating surfaces, and perhaps use spoke prep. That combined with a carbon wheel usually means I can go a few months without having to re-tension it. If it's a machine built wheel, I'll usually have to go at it after a handful of rides.

Reply

Frorider
0

I have three hope pro 4 rear hubs (hey, I’d get ‘em for 200 USD regularly from CRC in the UK) and based on the pics here I’m not seeing any big change in the labyrinth seal?  Anyone know what the change is?  Project 321 are superior but the Hopes were cheap enough I consider them decent value.

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.