FIRST IMPRESSIONS REVIEW
Introducing the 2021 Trek Slash 9.9 XO1
When Trek's Slash was released in 2016 it was an outlier. It wasn't the only long travel 29er available, but Trek fully committed to big wheels and there was no tweener-wheeled sibling following behind. This was bold at the time, but anyone with a stopwatch could see the future; this was an enduro race bike and big wheels are faster. It's possible they lost some sales at the time, but not enough to change course and release go back to a 650b version down the road; since the Slash 29 was released in 2016, there hasn't been a Slash with smaller wheels.
- New longer, lower, slacker geometry with reach numbers growing 30mm on the XL frame in low position and head angle moving from 65.1º to 64.1º
- Travel increased by 10mm to 170 up front and 160 rear
- Effective seat angle Increased 2º while actual seat tube angle increases by 1º
- Upper models equipped with new Rock Shox Super Deluxe thru shaft shock with usable open setting
- On board storage compartment in down tube for carbon and aluminum models
- Full length down tube guard protects against debris and truck tailgate damage
- threaded bottom bracket on all models
- Knock Block 2 increases steering from 58º to 72º and can be removed without fear of frame damage
- 34.9 mm post diameter increases strength and can improve longevity and performance of dropper post
The Slash was released as the geometry revolution was gaining steam and it wasn't long before the geo numbers started to look a little geriatric. The reach of the previous generation Slash in size XL is 481mm in the low position. The XL now measures 516mm while the new large measures 486mm. After falling a little behind, because of a long product cycle, you'd think Trek would want to push the envelope a little but there aren't many numbers here that would make the geo nerds salivate; in low position the head angle tips back to 64.1 from 65.1 while the effective seat angle (always a misleading number for long-legged folks) moves from 73.6 to 75.6. The wheelbase grows from 1219mm to 1264mm. If you are eyeing up a Pole or a Geometron these numbers aren't going to turn your head, but they aren't entirely off the back either.
Another change is weight. This is one category that seems to be moving backward for bikes of this ilk and a Slash 9.9 of the previous generation might have been sub 30lbs/13.5kg without pedals. The model we were sent was just over 32lbs/14.5kg out of the box without pedals, which might be a good thing. The original Slash we tested was damaged when it was in Perry Schebel's pantry. His theory at the time was that a can of food fell and hit the top tube, puncturing the carbon fibre clean through. While this was easily fixed locally, it made me wonder about what sort of forces the frame would be able to withstand.
Trek has done a solid job protecting the frame, with a sturdy full-length down tube protector attached. There's no need to worry about trail shrapnel or truck tailgates any longer. The chainstay protector covers the top and bottom of the stay with a thick material that effectively deadens sound. Both of these armouring devices appear to be replaceable and removable.
Cables and lines are kept in place by tidy little hatches, each secured with a bolt. Each hatch has space for two lines but can be sealed up if that is required, for riders who choose SRAM's AXS wireless components, for example.
There is a removable 6mm lever attached to the rear axle that also fits the front axle for quick wheel removals. If you prefer a clean look you can leave it at home and use the multi tool instead.
A feature that lives on in the Slash is the Knock Block, Trek's proprietary steering limiter that prevents the bars from turning beyond a certain angle. The previous version was a necessity because the straight shape of the down tube meant the top caps of your fork would strike the frame without Knock Block to stop it. Now that the bike has been stretched out, the fork clears easily, so why did Trek persist with KB? I was told this was because some riders like the feature, and it's not without benefits; you can cut your cables and lines extremely short without fear of damaging them, and in a crash you are less likely to yank out a brake line because your bars have spun completely. The angle limit of the old system wasn't sufficient for some riders but it of course couldn't be removed. The new version allows an entirely respectable turning radius (72º in either direction or 144º total while the previous Slash was only 58º or 116º in total) and it can be removed if you choose, although I haven't been able to do so yet.
I tried to remove the Knock Block with an appropriately-sized 2.5mm hex key, but the fitting felt soft right away. I was using an older tool so I grabbed the multi-tool from the steerer because the 2.5mm had never been used. Unfortunately it stripped despite my careful second effort. I wasn't attempting to remove it because of any perceived limitations, this was simply for testing purposes. I'll get it out eventually with some careful drilling, but can we please stop using 2.5mm fittings wherever possible? Or if a small fitting is required maybe a Torx could be used instead?
One of the most interesting and compelling developments for me is Trek's adoption of the down tube storage system pioneered by Specialized. When this first appeared on Trek's Fuel, I was curious about patents and intellectual property. The word from Trek is that you can't patent a hole in a frame, but clearly it wouldn't have been possible to duplicate Specialized's SWAT door. Trek's solution here is better in some ways and inferior in others. The Specialized solution is very sturdy and it feels like it's structural. The downside is that it takes some effort to open and close and it can't always be done quickly. In comparison the Trek storage door feels a little flimsy. The bottle cage moves around a little when things get bumpy but I don't think I've come close to losing a bottle. The upside is that access is fast and easy, with a simple lever used to gain entry to the pocket. Inside the tube, the Slash doesn't have a tunnel for cables and housing so it's a little less smooth and there are some zip ties to deal with, but it works fine. Storage volume seems similar but I haven't yet compared how much I can stuff in each one. One of the coolest things about the integrated storage is that Trek figured out how to add it to the aluminum models as well.
Trek's sincere flattery of Specialized continues with Bontrager BITS, its steerer-stashed multi-tool, complete with chain device. It's not quite as slick as Specialized's spring-loaded system with the rotating disk cover, but now that it's broken in, it takes but a moment to gain access to the tool and I like it quite a lot. Again, there are pros and cons compared to Specialized. It's nice that the tool and the chain device are housed together, but you have the caddy to deal with when the tool is out, whereas the Specialized tool comes out on its own. Upsides are more tools on the multi and no extra extraction effort required in the event of a chain repair.
The shape of the Slash is very good with one exception: the seat tube. While the effective angle has shifted one degree steeper to 75.6º in low and 76.1º in high, the actual seat angle is a very slack 66.6 in the low position and 67.1 in the high orientation. If you happen to have short legs for your body shape this is not a problem, but it certainly is if you are long of leg, as I am. With the post at my preferred extension and the saddle centred on the rails it felt like I could barely reach the bars. To achieve a comfortable seated pedalling position, I had to push the saddle almost all the way forward on the rails. This is NBD with the saddle up but it means that when the saddle is down, it's too far forward for me to sit comfortably. I've become used to it in the time I've had the bike but this is certainly less than ideal for taller riders or those with proportionately long legs.
I rode the bike mostly in the low position but for my most recent ride, on less steep trails than usual on Mt. Fromme, it was in high and it felt a little more keen to pump and pop out of corners but not quite as stable at speed or pushing through rough bits.
The model I've been riding is the Slash 9.9 X01, which you might think includes a complete SRAM X01 drivetrain. Unfortunately, like one of the Yeti's we tested recently, the only parts that are X01 are those with names prominently displayed; cranks, derailleur, and shifter. The cassette and chain are SRAM GX. While these are good quality parts, they aren't thought to be as durable as X01 and the cassette is a significant 150 grams heavier.
That's my only gripe however, and the drivetrain performed flawlessly. It's also been awhile since I've been on SRAM Code brakes and the RSC models on the Slash are extremely good in every condition I've tried them on.
After that, Bontrager parts take over. The Line Elite Dropper performed well but it is a little slow on the return. The new dropper lever is great however and I had no desire to swap it out. It's I-Spec EV and Matchmaker compatible as well. I've had no complaints about the Bontrager Line wheels thus far and the tires, (Bontrager SE5 29 x 2.60" front, SE4 29 x 2.40" rear, Team Issue, Tubeless Ready, Core Strength sidewalls, aramid bead, 60 tpi) have performed well in the relatively warm and dry summer conditions.
The only Bontrager parts I had any issues with were the bars, saddle, and the grips. The grips are a personal preference thing of course, and I prefer something narrower and without an external collar but I could have ridden the included Bontragers in a pinch. The bars were initially 820mm wide, which is great for the gorillas out there, and you can of course always cut down a bar, and this one is now 770mm. The issue I have is that to make a handlebar that wide strong enough, it's likely going to have to be very stiff, and the bar is giving me sore hands for the first time in years. I don't find the saddle very comfy but it's quite soft so it may be that my bony butt is pushing right through the foam and resting on the shell. This isn't a deal breaker either and I haven't been bothered enough by the saddle to swap it out, but the bar is going to be changed shortly. All in all the spec is solid but, like most bikes in this era, rather uninspired.
Up front I was happy to open the box and discover a 170mm RockShox Zeb Ultimate with a 44 mm offset. If you happened to read my review on this fork you'll know that I really like it, and this one was also excellent as soon as I pointed it down hill. The robust chassis pairs well with the very solid feeling Slash and it has kept me smiling at about 60 PSI.
The shock handling the 160mm of rear travel is a new unit that was the result of a collar between Rock Shox and Trek's suspension development department. By name it's a RockShox Super Deluxe Ultimate, DebonAir spring, Thru Shaft 3-position damper and it measures 230 x 62.5mm. Thru Shaft has been around for awhile and the claimed benefits are pretty significant. Because there is no internal floating piston or nitrogen charge, it runs at lower pressure and can be serviced by most shops. Thru Shaft shocks are also said to have a longer interval between services. The three position damper can be tuned easily on the trail to be neutral or have a slight increase or decrease in compression damping. As Chris Mandell of RockShox explained, you might put it to the plus position for A-Line and then twist it to minus for Schleyer in the Whistler Bike Park. So far the shock has been very good but I'm going to need more time on a wider variety of trails to dial it in and give a more thorough assessment. An unusual development is that it seems to be seeping a very small amount of oil. While this is likely nothing to worry about, it's not something I'm accustomed to seeing so it seems worth mentioning. We'll be digging deeper into the technology of this shock in the coming weeks.
Wheel and Tire Size
We had a little online session with Trek about the bike and they sent us along a FAQ page. One of the questions was about whether other wheel sizes could be used (no) and the other was max tire size (29 x 2.4). I took this as a challenge and rode the bike as a mullet recently with a 27.5 x 2.6 tire in the rear. It worked well and in the high position I didn't have significant pedal clearance issues, but the bike didn't seem to perform better overall and I missed the big rear wheel's willingness to skip over holes. I have also used a 29 x 2.6" tire in the rear and there is ample clearance. So much so that I wouldn't hesitate for a moment to recommend it, despite Trek's reluctance to do so. Be warned, however, that this could void your warranty.
The 2021 Slash handles very well, both at speed and in slower tech sections. It's not as nimble as some bikes in the category, but it's adequate, and it compensates by being very solid and stable at speed. It holds a corner extremely well and the rear end is stiff and precise. It feels to me like the Slash takes a little more effort to tip into a corner or change direction, but once I learned the appropriate body english it became much more fun in the twisty bits. The bike chows down on rough sections and encourages me to charge a little harder, and it seems to feel better when I'm attacking and skipping over things. I don't yet feel like I've nailed the damping on the rear shock for a wide range of conditions and I think I'm running the fork a little too firm so this is only likely to get better.
The first thing I noticed once I saddled up the Slash and pointed it downhill was a voice asking me if I was making the right trail choice. We were heading down a trail I normally wouldn't choose on a fresh bike, but I decided to give it a go on the Slash, and it was the right decision. This is an easy bike to ride and everything felt very natural from the first drop in and I haven't looked back since.
This has been a weird summer for just about everyone and I haven't been riding in many of the places I try to hit up in the season, notably Squamish, Silver Star and Whistler. That means I'm going to need more time on the Slash before giving a final verdict, but the early returns have been excellent. One of the consistent impressions I've had is that this is a pleasingly solid feeling chassis that responds well to inputs. It requires a little more encouragement than some bikes I've ridden in this category, like the Yeti SB150 or Santa Cruz Bronson, but it responds more readily than the Santa Cruz Megatower.
This new Trek Slash is great on rough, bermed corners and it has been an absolute monster riding steeps. I've climbed it up quite a lot of both singletrack and fire roads and (surprise!) I haven't felt the need to lock out the shock. It's very stable in response to pedalling inputs and I immediately felt how the stiffness of the bottom bracket area transferred energy efficiently, something I haven't notice on a long travel bike in a long time.
This is a hell of a bike and I seem to get a little more smitten every time I saddle up so it'll be interesting to see where that leaves me in a couple of months. For more info, head over to Trekbikes.com
Age - 54
Height - 6'/183cm (mostly legs)
Weight - 165lbs/75kg
Ape Index - 0.986
Inseam - 33"/84cm
Trail I've been stoked on lately - Fifth Horseman
Bar Width - 770mm
Preferred Reach - 475-490mm