PG_230322_FB_1081
REVIEW

Ibis Ripmo AF Long, Long Term Review*

Photos Riding Shots - Deniz Merdano, Product Shots - Dave Tolnai
Reading time

What’s the secret to a good bike review? Honestly, who the hell knows? Many of them suck! Some are great. You could read one that goes deep into kinematics, one that goes deep into ride feel, and one that goes deep into mechanical details and come away thinking “that was a pretty good review!” I feel like my style bounces around a little bit, perhaps down to mood or zeitgeist or some other factor. Lately, I’ve been going for a more holistic view. A little bit touchy-feely. “Who am I?” would be a good way to think of things. You know, if I was a bike.

On top of your review strategy, there are endless other variables that may have an impact. What season are you riding in? How’s your fitness? What trails are you riding a lot of? How long do you have the bike for? All of these have an impact on what you spit out the back of the review process.

This little Ripmo has been in my possession for an awfully long time (first look in December 2020!). It’s seen a host of changes, an incredible array of riding conditions and run my entire spectrum of riding styles. As well, my final review of this bike was lumped together with a final review of the Canyon Spectral that I was also riding at the time. There were so many similarities between these bikes, it felt impossible to separate my impressions. Add this up and it’s time to take another look at this bike.

This isn’t necessarily going to be a re-review of this bike. I’m going to focus more on the changes that I made and the impact that it had. I’m going to talk about them in descending order of import, from biggest bang for the buck down to meh. Looking at it another way, I would consider buying this bike if I was shopping for one. Probably not this bike. If I stripped it back to stock, things would be a whole lot less appealing, and boy did somebody beat the piss out of this thing. So not this bike, that’s for sure. So another way to look at this would be if I were to buy myself a new Ripmo AF, what changes would be required, which would be nice-to-have, and which wouldn’t matter.

*Header Image - Paris Gore

Cockpit - Required

The cockpit that showed up on this bike was fine. The house brand bars and stem did the job, and the Lizard Skins grips provided a lot of grip. The largest issue was bar height. Unfortunately, the steerer tube was cut such that I could really only cheat 1 spacer in under the stem, which didn’t give me enough height out of handlebars.

Swapping to the Burgtec Ride High bar was the first step in turning this around. If you take the specs at face value, the 50mm rise of this bar added a good 25mm of bar height compared to the stock one. This was definitely heading in the right direction. The added sweep felt better in my hands as well.

Shortly after swapping to that bar, I also made the change over to ergonomic grips. This had a huge impact on how this bike (and others) rode for me. I still remember that first ride with those horrible looking commuter grips bolted onto the Ripmo. I felt like I had so much more control of the bike and I could put it wherever I wanted.

My last major control change was actually a fork change (more on that later). I mounted a Fox 36 to the front of the bike and that allowed me to cut the steerer long enough that I could go crazy with spacers. I brought the bar height up even higher, and the bike felt even better.

On both a bang-for-the-buck and outright performance level, all of these changes were impactful. It can be shocking how much a bike changes from even minor modifications to controls. Each of these made me more comfortable on the bike and gave me more control and consistency.

Rear Shock - Required

I originally had this much further down the list, but when I went through the consideration of actually buying this bike, I realized that I have zero interest in reverting to the stock shock. Moving to the Marzocchi shock made a big difference in how this bike rides, it just took a specific mental exercise to realize how important it was.

As I said in the review for that shock, the stock DVO isn’t necessarily a bad shock. It is a bit hard to separate the shock from the tune (and from the suspension overall, really), but most of what I didn’t like about that shock seemed to be down to the tuning decisions that Ibis made. I think lighter and less aggressive riders are going to get exactly what they need from it. If you weigh a bit more or have any sort of consequence in your riding though, I think you will appreciate a shock with a firmer compression tune. Yes, a bit more air pressure could help alleviate some of the bottoming issues, but that’s going to put more strain on that light damping and take you out of the sweet spot of the leverage curve. The slightly firmer tune of the Marzocchi is an improvement.

The volume of the Marzocchi is really tuneable as well. You can tune the DVO with bands, but I maxxed it out and still wanted more. A larger spacer in the Marzocchi helped give me an extra little bit of bottom out resistance, and there was still room for more.

The latest spec gets rid of the DVO and swaps in the same Marzocchi Bomber Air shock that I tried (or, alternatively, a DVO coil shock which I don’t think is a good fit for this bike). This is an interesting change. I for sure don’t like that this shock doesn’t have a climb switch and I worry that Ibis probably has specc’d a similarly light tune. The good news is that if that’s the case, any Fox service center can easily swap in a Med or Stiff tune for you.

Tires – Required

The Ripmo AF ships with Maxxis Assegai EXO+ Maxx Terra front and rear. Depending on where you live, this is fine or terrible. Some will complain about the lack of a Maxx Grip version on the front. Some will complain about the casing. Most will complain about the slow rolling boat anchor on the back.

It’s actually difficult to wrap your head around how slowly the Assegai on the rear rolls. Throw a DHRII on the back (same casing and compound) and the bike feels like it is rolling a whole lot faster without losing much (if anything) on the downhills.

If you can stomach Maxx Terra on the front of your bike, immediately take that Assegai off the rear, save it for when your stock front tire wears out, and buy something faster rolling for the rear. If you’re a compound or casing zealot that can’t deal with EXO+ or Maxx Terra, take them both off right away and sell them to somebody that doesn’t care. Whatever you do though, do yourself a favor and immediately pull that tire off the rear of your bike. It doesn’t belong on the back of a Ripmo.

DSC05689-uncledave-ibis-ripleyaf-canyon-spectral

I lost track of all of the tires I ran on this bike, but it was the full gamut from semi-slick XC tires all the way up to super sticky DH rubber.

Brakes – Must Have/Nice-to-have

The Ripmo came stock with SLX brakes, with metallic pads and non-ice tech rotors. This was fine, but not great. The problem seemed to be with the rotors. Once I swapped the ice tech rotors (and wheels) from the Canyon Spectral I was testing at the same time, braking performance was much, much better. Why this was the case, I’m not sure. I don’t think it was down to the thermal performance of the ice tech rotor. There is obviously something different between the braking track of the cheaper rotors and the ice techs. Swapping rotors made things good enough.

Taking things further, TRP was kind enough to send me not one, but two sets of brakes to review. I’ve talked in depth about the Slate EVO’s, and they were an upgrade from the stock SLX’s. With metallic pads installed, more power and better modulation would be my summary.

Since that review I’ve swapped over to the Trail EVO’s (and then back to the Slates). There are a few differences between the Trail and the Slate, but what I was expecting was a slightly upmarket feeling but the same basic sensations – similar to an XT vs. an SLX brake. This wasn’t exactly the case.

Where the Slate is US$150 per wheel (no rotor), the Trail is US$225. Finish is better and the lever/master cylinder is nicer, but that’s about all you get for the money. The Trail has the same short stroke as the Slate (I didn’t measure, but they feel pretty similar) but I couldn’t get the bite point close enough to the lever for my liking. I don’t run my levers particularly close to the bar, so this was somewhat surprising. I asked TRP about this. At one point they suggested there was a change being made, and at another point they weren’t so sure. This really all does just come down to the length of the reach adjustment bolt. So other sets of Trail EVO’s may or may not have the same issue.

I’m also a bit confused by the bleed ports on the Trail. The Slate uses the stock Shimano fitting at the master cylinder, so you can get away with using the Shimano plastic funnel for bleeding. The Trail does not. So you may find you need additional bleed tools to set this brake up. Not a huge deal, but a bit weird to me.

So, bottom line, replacing the brakes is a nice-to-have, but new rotors are a must. If you are going to swap brakes, the Slate EVOs are a nice option.

Drivetrain – Meh/Must Have

I put this in both categories because on one hand I don’t care, but on the other, the bike doesn’t work if I don’t make this switch.

Deep into a Sunshine Coast ride I found myself popping off the side of a dumb little ladder bridge. As I was doing so, I realized that I had fucked up a split second before I heard the crunching noise of my rear derailleur exploding. This sucked for two reasons. First, I had a long uphill walk ahead of me before I could coast down to the ferry. Second, this was at the height of our Covid supply chain woes and I knew that nobody was going to be giving up a new rear derailleur all that easily.

So what I did was dig an XT with a broken parallelogram out of the bowels of Cams bike room and I mated that up to the okay looking parallelogram of my broken SLX. The franken-derailleur sort of worked, but skipped in a bunch of gears. Perhaps something was bent, or perhaps an SLX body just doesn’t work all that well with an XT cage?

To the rescue came the Archer D1X system. For me, the killer feature of this system is the ability to set it up for any cable pull and any number of gears that you might ever want to shift. Adjusting for the idiosyncracies of a cobbled together rear derailleur was no problem at all.

Since the time of review, Archer hooked me up with their new style of shift paddle. This thing makes a huge difference in how the system functions. It’s much more intuitive and easy to use. There’s no more hunting for a small button sitting beside another small button. Just press the top half for a harder gear or the bottom half for an easier gear.

All that being said, I think through this process I’ve learned that I’m not an electronic shifting kind of guy. I like how easy it is to use and how crisply it shifts. Indeed, I’d go so far as to say my cobbled together, tired, old SLX on the Ripmo shifts better than the much newer XT on the GG Gnarvana that I’m testing right now. So from a function perspective, it’s amazing.

What I can’t stand is worrying about batteries. I meant to get back onto the Ripmo earlier this year but I found myself in a cycle of “I should ride the Ripmo today! Oh crap, I haven’t charged the batteries. I should pull the batteries out after I ride the GG.” And then I never did. Granted, if I had only one bike, I probably wouldn’t have delayed this happening for so long. And it doesn’t help that it’s kind of a pain to charge the Archer system. It’s a pain to get the batteries out of the shifter (the part that pulls the cable) and you have to yank the remote (the part on the handlebars) right off if you don’t have your bike sitting near an outlet. It’s an extra hassle and something that is easier on an AXS system (aside from having to change a CR2 in the handlebar shifter on AXS). I would prefer to not have to worry about such things.

Other than that, it’s a pretty great system. It works really well and I love the universality. Ya, it’s a bit clunky, and a bit expensive, but what isn’t these days? If I owned this bike I would probably source a new derailleur and hanger and revert to mechanical shifting, but for now the Archer got me out of my bind, works really well and it stays on the bike.

Inserts – Meh/Nice-to-have

Fairly early in the process, I installed a set of Rimpact inserts on the Ripmo. This was one of my earliest (if not the earliest) experiences with inserts, and I started to experiment with slightly lower pressure. And I liked it!

Since, I’ve played around with the new EXO+ on this bike with no insert and has been fine. I’m running the same pressure and there haven’t been any issues. Mentally, I probably approach certain sections a bit more gingerly, but not overly so. I haven’t been within sight of a bike park, so my use case isn’t the same as many people out there. For me, not having to mess around with inserts is nice and if I was really concerned I’d probably just go Double Down on the rear instead. In fact, I bought one, but I just haven’t bothered installing it.

In a perfect world, I would always run inserts if I didn’t have to deal with installation. Rimpacts aren’t even all that bad in this regard, but they’re still enough of a hassle to prevent me from changing tires very often. For a bike like this where versatility is a lot of the appeal, the trade-off isn’t worth it.

DSC05634-uncledave-ibis-ripleyaf-canyon-spectral.jpg

This could have been the main image...but it was easier to credit Paris Gore there. Sorry Deniz!

Wheels - Meh

During the main testing period, I did a lot of wheel swapping between the Ripmo and the Spectral. Actually, it was more like swapping the Spectral wheels back and forth between both of the bikes. This was for a variety of reasons, most with nothing to do with the actual wheels.

Most important were the brake rotors. As you read above, the Ice Tech rotors worked much better than the stock Ibis ones, and it was just easiest to leave them on one set of wheels and swap them between bikes. I was also swapping pads, but that was down to the stock organic pads on the Spectral. We talked about this already.

Next were the tires. I did spend a fair amount of time on the front/rear Assegai combo that came stock on the Ripmo, but the DHF/DHR II combo of the Spectral rolled faster and had similar levels of grip. Both were Maxx Terra/EXO +, and both had Rimpact inserts installed. We also talked about this already.

The wheels themselves on the Ripmo are just fine. Since the Spectral went back, they’ve seen lots of mileage, and a few different sets of tires. The one thing I don’t like about the asymmetric profile is that it makes tire swaps difficult, especially with inserts. The trick I learned is…shit! I forgot the trick! Because of the offset rim, it’s far easier if you get a certain side of the bead seated first. The problem is that I’ve forgotten which. One way totally sucks and the other works fine. I think you need to seat the longer side first. That way, as you put the second bead on it’s much easier to get that bead seated in the channel of the rim, which gives you the necessary slack in the bead to get it installed. If you seat the short side first and then have to push the second bead over all that rim bed to get at the channel it’s a real pain in the ass. Ya…that sounds right. I’m going with that. Either way, offset rims kind of suck for seating tires.

For the last few weeks I’ve had a nice, expensive set of carbon fiber wheels on the Ripmo. I haven’t noticed a huge difference in ride quality with this change. The stock wheels are showing some wobbles and I’m confident the carbon ones will run true for a long period of time, but the change isn’t all that noticeable. It’s just wound up being an expensive way to true my wheels. I’m not complaining, but if it were my money I’d run the stock wheels until they exploded, and then I’d probably replace them with some aluminum rims from DT Swiss.

DSCF8958

I haven't actually run the DVO since mounting the Fox. I wonder if I would be singing the same tune if I mounted that fork back on the bike?

Fork - Meh

That’s not to say I don’t like the 36! But I certainly wouldn’t pay that much money to swap out the DVO. There’s a lot more tuning room in the DVO and I think I could get it there (or nearly there) with a bit of work and tuning.

Interestingly, the new version comes stock with a Marzocchi Z1 Coil! I’d be really curious to try that out.

Things that I didn’t change

That brings me to the relatively short list of things that I didn’t change.

Headset – nothing wrong with the stock Cane Creek headset!

Dropper – The stock Bike Yoke is so smooth. It’s noticeably smoother than the Bike Yoke on the GG Gnarvana, which I think has some struggles in the routing department. Speaking of which, I wish Bike Yoke would move to having the cable end at the post, rather than a fiddly little barrel bolt. That’s probably the only thing I would change. Ibis is even shipping size specific posts now! 215mm drop on the XL!

WTB Silverado Saddle – The stock saddle is a little worse for wear, but super comfortable. I’m a fan.

SLX Cranks, Chain, Cassette – No issues here. All working just fine. It’s probably time to swap the chain, though. I think this is the best bang-for-the-buck drivetrain out there right now. I even prefer it to XT in some regards.

Now, about that frame

People have a lot of things to say about the Ripmo AF. Great spec! Great price! Great value! Fun to ride! Not many people are talking about how much of a looker the frame is. There’s just something about that frame (especially the XL version) that shrugs off lust.

It’s a pretty bomber frame choice though, other than a few nitpicks. The first is the aluminum cable stops which damage your cables. One of them even got stuck in the frame, and is now just a big hole in the frame with a brake line sticking out. Ibis does offer plastic versions to swap in, and might even be shipping those stock now. The aluminum ones need to go.

I also wish there was a slightly taller head tube. That would alleviate some of my control challenges, and I think it would also balance out the look of the bike a bit. 120mm certainly isn’t the shortest head tube I’ve seen on an XL bike, but I wish bike companies would add a bit more length on their larger sizes.

Kinematics wise, I’d tweak things a little bit, as well. Ibis talks a lot about how progressive the linkage is, but most of that comes before sag. I think a bit more bottom out resistance would help this bike out.

Other than that, though, it’s been a remarkably solid frame. The paint has a few chips in the usual spots, but nothing crazy. And the bushings and bearings in the linkage are running great still! I don’t know how many miles I’ve put on this bike, but it’s seen a lot of mud and a lot of hosing down.

Final Thoughts

Where does that leave me with this bike? Stock, compared to the Spectral, I preferred the Spectral. I thought it rode lighter and firmer and I appreciated that. Now, with all of those changes, I think my opinion has changed.

I still think this bike is too soft, but I’m bothered less by it. I’m realizing that there is a trade-off here though. This is a very forgiving bike that is very easy to ride. It would be silly to think that the softer rear end doesn’t play a part in that. It’s not the best bike for hammering fast through rough terrain, but it climbs amazingly well and is quite a bit of fun to stuff in and out of corners. Yes, I would like a bit more bottom out resistance and a bit more support through the middle, but who’s to say that doesn’t change the character of the bike and make it worse overall?

The most interesting part of this build for me is that despite all of the dramatic changes, what I think made the biggest difference was just getting my hands up where they needed to be. Once I did that, the bike felt a lot more consistent and comfortable. Who would have thought the most important change would be the one that was easiest and cheapest?

That’s an interesting lesson for me in bike testing. Over the years I’ve moved from incredibly picky about controls and set-up to just riding whatever is put in front of me. I’m definitely more adaptable now, but perhaps I need to re-visit some of my pickiness? This lesson definitely stresses the importance of getting your basic fit dialed in before moving on to larger changes.

So that’s the story of this bike. It’s not perfect, but it’s an easy bike to ride and very forgiving. It’s more at home on smoother and smaller terrain. It can handle the larger stuff, but it will let you know about it. It pedals well and can cover distances. Add that all together and it’s a pretty great package that is easy to own and will allow you to do lots of different things. Just leave some money to swap your rotors, buy a new rear tire, tune your rear shock and invest in the right cockpit setup. The same could probably be said of many bikes.

Sorry,

Uncle Dave

Related Stories

Trending on NSMB

Comments

BadNudes
+4 Niels van Kampenhout Etacata Jotegir Lynx .

Great Review of quite an interesting bike. I definitely get a lot more out of this than reading about something that costs closer to (or over) 5-figures with carbon everything and half a dozen batteries. 

Regarding the rotors - I spotted the RT66 rotors in a photo, which have previously been my go-to. I've heard that they moved the manufacture of these from Japan to Malaysia (edit: China), and they are now stamped rather than laser cut, without reducing the MSRP AFAIK I might note... If so, the rounded edges would reduce contact area and the cleaning/wiping effect of the holes could become more of a smearing effect trapping dirt/brake dust between pad and rotor. I'd bet that's the difference you're feeling between the stock and the ice-tech rotors. I haven't got any new RT66 so haven't had a close look myself, but if they are stamped I'll be shopping for something else that is laser cut..

Reply

niels@nsmb.com
+2 BadNudes Lynx .

Interesting! I have SLX w/ RT-66 rotors on my personal bike and they've been totally fine for 3 years. Riding back to back with a test bike that had XT w/ ice tech rotors I didn't notice any difference.

I received a new test bike last week with SLX w/ RT-66 rotors and felt the braking power was a bit lacking.

After reading your comment I went to look and the older ones (that work fine) are made in Japan while the new ones are made in China. The edges do look a little more rounded on the new ones.

However this still doesn't explain Dave's issue with the rotors since in the photo it shows JAPAN on his rotor.

Reply

BadNudes
+1 Niels van Kampenhout

I missed that - thanks. I have similar experience with the older Japanese RT66, i.e. they worked great. Leaves me wondering why they weren't feeling OK for Dave, though I think sometimes you just get unlucky with certain pad/rotor combos that should on paper be compatible, and the only solution is new pads and/or rotors. Contamination, bed-in, set-up, QC/mfg issues, or a combination, sometimes it remains a mystery in the end.

Reply

ReformedRoadie
+1 BadNudes

THIS.  Comparing the older RT-66 to the OEM crap, also labeled RT-66...it's like night and day.  The latter look cheap, like something from a WalMart bike.

I jumped on a insane CRC deal for some Hayes rotors while upgrading the rear to 203...haven't had a chance to ride them yet, but I am contemplating some MTX red label race pads to go with them.

Reply

davetolnai
+1 BadNudes

I think the fact that they have several versions of the same rotor labelled the same probably tells us something.  These ones did not feel of a very high quality.  Holding them in my hands I would have assumed they were "resin only".  I can't put my finger on exactly what it was about them, though.

Reply

Jotegir
+1 BadNudes

"Great Review of quite an interesting bike. I definitely get a lot more out of this than reading about something that costs closer to (or over) 5-figures with carbon everything and half a dozen batteries."

Well, if you strap on all the upgrades Dave did to this over his several year tenure with the bike, it ends up a lot closer to those carbon everything, half-dozen battery bikes, haha!

That said, it's still a lot less to pay at the end of the day for  a hand-selected bike spec.

Reply

BadNudes
+3 Jotegir Velocipedestrian ohio

Ha, yeah true. But more than the total cost, it's about the process of making the bike work better for the rider's requirements or preferences; what works, what doesn't, and why. A 10k carbon model wit AXS and Kashima would still need a taller riser bar in this case.

Additionally, buying a cheaper model and upgrading as you see fit is an easy way of spreading the cost out as income allows, or avoid the sticker shock of a stock build that comes with e.g the damper you really want, and you end up with a more unique, customized, and IMO interesting build.

Reply

davetolnai
+1 BadNudes

Ya.  For sure.  I'm conscious of that.  Of course, I also came to the conclusion that a lot of them weren't necessary changes.  That's a bit of an academic exercise though.  For example, the Fox fork.  I mean, I don't think the bike needs it, but I also haven't put the energy into swapping the DVO back on.

Reply

aztech
+3 Andrew Major Niels van Kampenhout Etacata

Nice review! Just wanted to say that the Bikeyoke droppers are able to have the cable end either at the post or the remote, there's a clamping screw in the newer Triggy remote.

Reply

davetolnai
+1 Etacata

This is a good point that it's not the dropper but the lever that dictates this.  On this bike, it doesn't really matter because I have no need to look at it.  I'll have a look at the Guerilla Gravity and see if that lever is able to clamp the cable.

Reply

Jotegir
+2 Vik Banerjee Andrew Major

Really, you can hack almost any post/lever combo to work with the cable end at either end, or even no end. You can replace cable-head barrels with grub screw barrels, or pinch cable at either end, or both ends. After a decade of dropper use, many shops will have a reasonable parts bins of the things so finding the appropriate cable head barrel/grub barrel swap shouldn't be the end of the world if its something that'll stop you from buying another lever. The only type this doesn't work for is cable head, no barrel, no pinch screw ends, but those aren't super common.

Reply

kavurider
+2 Hbar ohio

I love my Ripmo AF.  I bought it lightly used on PinkBike and immediately clicked with it.  I'm running the stock DVO Topaz air shock and a Zeb 170 up front.  I was running a Trust Shout, but I blew it up and was able to get the Zeb super cheap.

This is all just in my experience - it climbs very well, I even made a few tech climbs that I was never able to make on other bikes.  It is a bit heavy, but I don't notice when I am riding it.  I finally got the rear shock to behave.  Not perfectly, but good enough for me.  When I bother to look, I am about 40 secs off the fastest times on some local descents, so it is no slouch.  For reference, I am about 170 lbs and my go-to local trail is National on South Mountain in Phoenix Arizona. 

I love that the rear end is so easy to take apart.  Encourages me to do it more often.  The rocks getting caught in the linkage is kind of a bummer, but the paint was already chipped when I bought it. 

All in all, I love it!

Reply

dbozman
+1 Mammal

Interesting. My biggest knock on the bike was how hideous it is. Then that rat’s nest of cabling around the bottle cage. And frame flex.

But the performance of the bike was exemplary. Particularly with a Cascade link. Curious about your DVO shock comments. I ran four different shocks on the bike with the Cascade. The Jade X was far and away my favorite.

Reply

mammal
+1 ohio

The cascade link really did make a huge improvement in the leverage curve. I had the same issues with the Topaz as Dave did, but that wasn't the case after installing the CL.

I also went down the Long-shock road, with a 216x63 DVO Jade (not Jade-X), and a 2mm offset bushing, and that's the mode it's been in ever since. I thought I'd miss the climb switch, but I find it totally unnecessary now. I gladly trade that for HSC/LSC adjustments on the Jade.

Reply

Schmolson
0

Are you running the cascade link in long-shock mode?

Edit: that was some poor grammar. It makes it sound like the link has different modes. What I meant to ask was, are you using the cascade link with the 216x63 Jade and single 2mm offset bushing setup?

Reply

mammal
+1 Schmolson

No explanation necessary. No, the CL puts the swingarm in a position where it will interfere with the BB shell before the longer eye-to-eye shock will fit. The front mounting hole won't align by approx 2mm. 

I was pretty sure I'd need the added progression that the CL provides with the new shock/setup, but with some LSC/HSC adjustments on the Jade, and dialing the spring rate exactly right with a Sprindex, I've found a balance that I like. Linear, but doesn't bottom hard, and seems supportive enough.

Reply

qduffy
+1 Kenny

That was a fun read. I've had a few Ibises (Ibi?) and they tend to live very firmly in the trail category and must really be aimed at whippet-light quinoa-eating sun-kissed Californians. Even the HDs - while fun and poppy and relatively light - are overmatched by some of BC's terrain in the hands of all but the most capable riders. 

Rolling up to something really gnarly would often elicit a WTF? from my Ibis, so it wasn't always a super willing partner. The new bike - bigger, more progressive geometry - is totally DTF on pretty much anything my courage will permit.

Reply

Kenny
+1 qduffy

Yeah I have an HD5 as my "backup bike" and despite the numbers making it look like it should ride similar to a nomad, it does not seem to get too excited about gnarly terrain, at least when. I am piloting it. Haha .

Reply

clipless
+1 BadNudes

I've been surprised at how much raising my grips has improved my riding, and I'm just pedaling around in the flatlands of the Midwest.  I figured it was because I'm all torso, but I'm seeing more and more normal-proportion people comment on how much they like having a nice tall stack. Now that it seems like reach numbers and head angles have stabilized, I wouldn't be surprised to see bike companies pushing taller stacks as the new hotness.

Reply

BadNudes
0

I had a similar experience moving to a higher rise bar - I expected to really like it going downhill, but I did not expect to clean tech climbs that I'd never managed before. A lot to be said for putting yourself in a comfortable, neutral and not necessarily an 'aggressive' position on the bike.

Reply

fartymarty
0

Ditto - I've been a fan of tall bars since Andrew Major wrote about them eons ago now.  I'm currently on a 70mm rise Ergotec 12 degree back sweep bar with 20mm spacers on my 150mm forked Murmur.  I've previously run an 83mm rise Surly Sunrise and 20mm spacers and it still climbed well.

@Dave - have you tried a higher rise bar?  I still haven't found something that is too high.

Reply

bullit
0

I Had an AF and a Carbon V2 and have the same feeling regarding kinematic /shock tune,unfortunately I didn’t try a super Deluxe with megneg that in this frame might be game changer

Reply

Kenny
0

I had an af for about a year and put a super deluxe ultimate air on it, which really helped the bike. 

At 210lb these light shock tunes just don't work for me. 

With basically the things Dave says - a 170 lyrik, 40 rise bars, the super deluxe at 35% sag (I also didn't like how the bike descended with less sag than that) it went downhill really well, but it felt sluggish when not descending with that much sag. 

With less sag I didn't like the downhill performance. I could never find a happy medium and also felt the rear triangle was flexy for my weight and riding style (clumsy). 

My conclusion was similar to Dave's- with some changes, especially for someone who is sub 160lb, it's a pretty great value and can do a bit of everything.

Reply

danithemechanic
0

I think knowing who you are should be mandatory for any reviewer of any kind of bike.

I know who i am, and let me review the latest enduro shred sled and i could tell you it just plain sucks... for me!

As i keep on saying there are all these beautiful options out there in bike world and i keep on seeing people pushing absolute truths.

Great work Dave!

Reply

Captain-Snappy
0

Agreed on the K-Edge computer mount. Mine is an all-alu version(?) and it actually doesn't hold my Garmin all that solidly. Considering the cost, it's over-priced, IMO and not rally worth it.

Reply

davetolnai
0

It is a step up from the no name ones I ordered online, but it's definitely not 10x better.

Reply

oldmanbike
0

Nice review. Although my experience reading it was of feeling insecure and defensive about being happy with most of the stuff Dave was critical of. (While I'm willfully suspension-oblivious, I'm not brake-oblivious, yet I'm delighted with the SLXes, stock rotors and all.)

I did change the handlebar to a 40 mm riser and agree that was a noticeable improvement. And I also agree that the Assegai was riding through wet cement as a rear tire.

I bought it before they released their ebike, and wouldn't buy it today for that reason. But for me it's a great bike that makes me smile most every time.

Reply

kavurider
0

I am not sure, was this comment aimed at what I said? 

I wasn't trying to be defensive, just saying how I felt about the bike.  Guess it did not come across that way.

Mine came with Guide brakes, they are not great and I will be upgrading them next.  I also am not a fan of the stock bar, it is too low and has a weird sweep for me.  Tire wise, I run DH casing tires on mine.  I destroyed the stock Assegai pretty quickly. 

It is not perfect, but I love it and that is all I was trying to convey.

Reply

oldmanbike
+1 KavuRider

Not at all. I was aiming for witty and self-deprecating, no jab at you. I like mine too.

Reply

kavurider
0

Right on!

Reply

davetolnai
+1 OldManBike

The SLX brakes are fine, but it was noticeably more power with the rotor swap.  I think I touched on this in the Ripmo/Spectral comparison article, but the metallic/cheap rotor of the Ibis felt similar to the organic/ice tech rotor combo of the Spectral.  I wound up either swapping pads or rotors between the two bikes to get the best braking.  The Slate EVO's have similar power but modulate better.  I don't think I'd spend the money to get rid of the SLX's, but if I could choose between the two I would go Slate EVO.

Reply

ogopogo
0

I think Dave's criticism of the rear suspension is spot on.

I installed a cascade link to get some bottom out resistance and anticipate adding some high speed compression to the Topaz whether by adding a shim or using DVOs forthcoming compression upgrade kit (https://www.pinkbike.com/news/dvo-compression-upgrade-kit-garnet-dropper-post-taipei-cycle-show-2023.html). I'm 170 lbs geared up so the damping isn't scarily uncontrolled. The cascade link significantly improved the kinematics. I'm able to run more sag with more support and no more hard bottom outs after removing a volume spacer.

The bike climbs and pedals very well, has minimal suspension interaction with the rear brake and if you got it on sale was a very competitive price. My Deore-based build has been solid despite having to get Suspension Werx to tune the Onyx pretty much immediately.

It's a long travel trail bike, probably not set up stock for really rowdy riding, but I wouldn't say its incapable of that pending a couple of setup changes.

Reply

mammal
0

My experiences exactly, with the Cascade Link.

Reply

Ceecee
0

Those carbon wheels must be undesireable if they present little difference in ride quality to the S35 29" alloy rim at 560g

Reply

just6979
0

The difference between the shocks might really be about spring rate range, not necessarily tunability. The DVO's max spring rate just wasn't as high. This doesn't mean that it's "less tunable", since the min rate could be lower, the bands could offer finer adjustments, etc.

Reply

davetolnai
0

Not sure I understand.  Are you saying the DVO is more/less progressive due to the spring rate?  That is possible.  I still think the spacers give more range than the bands, but it would be interesting to understand the difference in air volume, and change in air volume, between different shocks.  Maybe the numbers are already out there, but I've never bothered looking.

Reply

just6979
0

I'm not saying anything about progessive-ness. More like what you said in the second half of that comment. You think the spacers give more range than the bands, so you call that "more tunability". Would be nice to know the numbers before you throw the DVO under the bus.

Reply

Kenny
0

I specifically stated I felt my issue was related to Ibis' choice of damper tune and not the shock itself. There's no throwing DVO under the bus happening here, I don't think. 

Ibis have a reputation for light damper tunes whose performance can be a mixed bag for heavier riders, and that includes Ibis supplied  fox components as well. 

You could likely modify the damping on the topaz to good effect as well, if that's what you're trying to say. 

In my case it was easier to just buy a readily available SDU with 12 clicks of compression damping that cover a pretty wide damping range, than go down the rabbit hole of modifying the topaz damper.

Reply

davetolnai
0

For whatever reason, here I am looking back at this article and comments, and I'm kind of baffled by this comment.  Indeed, I went searching for where I said "less tunable", and I can't find it.  Either way, that doesn't really feel like "throwing DVO under the bus".

The Marzocchi just has more tuning range than the DVO!  Full stop.  There are far more options with spacers, both on the top and bottom end of the range.  And all of the clickers just do more than on the DVO.  The only place where the DVO edges the Marzhocchi is that you can tune the negative chamber with bands, as well.  But it might be possible to do something with the Marzocchi as well.

Anyhow.  I went out of my way, multiple times, both here and with the separate Marzocchi shock review to stress that much of my issue is down to the tune that Ibis specified...or at least could likely be down to that.  I'm puzzled that you would view this as "throwing DVO under the bus."

Reply

just6979
0

Come on, you claim the Marz has more "tuning range" with no numbers to back it up. Only that you can't get the spring rate progression high enough for your preference on that specific bike. No overall compression-ratio/spring-rate comparisons, no damping force comparisons, nothing but anecdotes. You even counter yourself by mentioning the bands' ability to be used for negative spring tuning: that's a whole class of spring tuning that is not supported at all on the allegedly "more tunable" Bomber, ie: the Bomber has zero "tuning range" in that aspect.

You also mostly ignore the fact that they have quite different damper tunes (Ibis' very light OEM tune vs the medium/medium aftermarket tune). There is a very good chance that the OEM-specced Bomber would feel just as bad for you as the OEM-spec DVO. It would likely have that same very light Ibis tune, making the spring-rate a much larger factor in the feel and meaning you might have ended up with the largest Bomber spacer to prevent bottoming, with the trade-off of frequently slamming into the wall of progression. Sure, it has more spring-rate on the top-end, but do you really want to set it up that way? Or does it make way more sense to get an appropriate damper tune and not even approach needing such silly high spring-rate progression.

Also, how does the Bomber have more [spring-rate] tuning range on the bottom end? Are there less-than-zero spacers? Does the DVO have a higher minimum pressure?

Reply

Kenny
+2 Mammal Velocipedestrian

I don't think so. I had a topaz and then a super deluxe. Both shocks were capable of producing whatever spring rate I desired. 

I felt the bike rode best with fairly high sag - 35% or so, then pretty much max volume spacers since the progression on the stock leverage curve is non existent in the real world since there isn't much of it to speak of further in the travel. 

The topaz just didn't have firm enough damping (in either direction) to really cope with this approach to setup. Not the fault of the topaz, ibis are known for specifying very light damper tunes. 

I suspect that's part of why the cascade link helps quite a bit on this bike as you can develop end stroke progression via leverage ratio instead of air spring curve, which helps the damping situation.

Reply

mammal
0

Bingo on all accounts.

Reply

ReformedRoadie
0

Can that Archer gizmo be mounted on top of the seat stay?  Seems like that would be a more direct cable route as well as less exposed to damage?   Just curious.

Reply

davetolnai
0

Probably?  I think it would be bike dependent.  It's not really in the way of anything down on the chainstay (on this bike, anyhow) other than being a bit awkward on wheel replacement.  Anything that damages it there is going to damage a lot of other things as well.

Reply

JakeE.Pooh
0

This might be my all-time favorite review. I loved the last few paragraphs. Good freaking work, man!!

Reply

TheJankFiles
0

I bought a AF coil in the early days when it was the DVO Jade X and Onyx SC D1 and full Deore everything. Hated the Deore derailleur, clutch failed on the second ride, never shifted that well as the cable routing into the rear triangle was causing a lot of friction. Coil shock… never should’ve been an option to buy. I ended up happiest with a RS Super Deluxe air. 4 pot Deore brakes were decent with metal pads and 203 rotors. I sold the bike though, it was just way to flexy in the bottom bracket area. 200lbs on a XL I don’t expect everything to be tailor made, but this was pretty much my worst mtb bike experience ever.

Reply

Schmolson
0

To add a data point, not necessarily in opposition or support to your experience, I am 210lbs kitted, with 2L of water, and picked up a full Deore RAF with JadeX and Onyx SC D1. At 185cm, I am right on the line b/w L and XL. I sized down because that is what was available at the time.

The bike was not perfect, but I can't say that it was anywhere near the worst bike experience ever.

Three things stood out immediately. First, the stock dropper lever was near impossible to depress. Second, the Onyx fork was so sticky that I could let all the air out and it would not depress on its own; it took about 20lbs pressure to push it in. Lastly, the JadeX spring that came stock was 500lb/in which put me >35% sag.

The first problem was solved with $82.50CAD on a OneUp V3 dropper remote and clamp. There are no words to describe the difference in experience b/w the stock remote and the V3. I don't think that would be everyone's experience depending on what they are replacing, but in my case it felt like the best money ever spent.

The second turned out to be a pretty painless warranty issue. DVO was quick to respond, though I had to send the fork to Suspension Werx so I was without a bike mid-season for a couple of weeks. My cost to ship was around $75CAD fully insured, which was unfortunate, but the work and return shipping was covered. The invoice indicated that there was a twisted Q-ring, and the bushings needed to be resized (perhaps that explains the sticky-ness). The fork that came back from Suspension Werx felt completely different. More like what I was initially expecting.

Lastly, the DVO coil spring that came stock on my L frame was 500lb/in, and put me >35% sag. I never experienced any harsh bottom out, but it was evident that I was under-sprung. I found a 600lb/in used for $80 and tried it out. It got me up to 30% sag and the balance of the bike (front to rear) felt better, but it still felt a little 'dead' at the back. I played with the rebound and bladder pressure but could not find a improvement using the super scientific Same-Worse-Better testing. Enter the single most expensive solution I have found to date for that 'dead' feeling, the Cascade Components Ripmo AF link. The link was ~$420CAD to my doorstep, so about 10% of the total cost of the bike. Ouch. With the link installed, the back of the bike now feels like I expected it to feel.

Other small nit-picks I noticed over the first season of riding on the stock build that are more unique to each person. The 175mm cranks are too long for the combination of BB height and my poor technique over roots and rocks when climbing. I have, at long last, a set of 165mm cranks that need to get installed before I can comment on whether shorter is better for me. Also, I don't get along with the stock bars. The low-rise and angles lead to some wrist discomfort by the end of most rides. That will be the next test/upgrade. Finally, I replaced the WTB Volt with a WTB Koda and for now I will be sticking with the Koda (less numbness).

Again, I could not claim the the worst mtb experience ever (are you sure your experience was THE worst?), but I am not so blown away that I would recommend one to all of my friends.

Reply

mammal
0

How the frig was your Cascade Link so expensive?? It's $223 USD.

Reply

Schmolson
0

Right?! 

Well, convert that USD to CAD and then ship it via DHL, let them tax it for you and then you get in that neighbourhood.

I had a quick look back at the two payments and the adjusted CAD total from Cascade Components was ~$360, and from DHL it was ~$60. I edited the previous post accordingly.

Reply

davetolnai
0

Agreed.  I'm baffled that they offer a coil.  Maybe the absolute lightest riders could get away with it, but even then, the linearity would be challenging.

Reply

tehllama42
0

Dave... only now getting around to reading this. Two notes:

1. My Wife started reading over my shoulder, and went out of her way to comment on the lengths I go through to consume only the highest quality media that is educational and provides good perspective

2. I keep finding myself going back to my old school assignment, because so, so, so much of this overlaps completely with that entire process I wound up with, and is a large part of why now that I'm getting into the career areas where the cost of a custom bike versus complaining about where a product manager got told 'no' by the suits, I really find myself leaning towards the 'buy once cry once' mentality.

That reference link again: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Lzqb4BVLJ5eagFJ8geWpdt8M41flJSi81-FMfEEFIU/edit?usp=sharing

Fair game to attack that.

Reply

davetolnai
0

I remember this from back in the day!  I actually played around with this a bit and was going to do something with it in excel, but it was taking far too much energy.  Very cool.

Reply

formartha
0

I’m using the same TRP Slate Evo and I wonder which bleed block you’ve used? If you can help with width measurements it will be awesome as I can’t source one here.

How would you rate the same brakes vs. SLX 4 Pot with ice tech rotors? Also, have you tested the blue pads? If so, how did it compare to the one you just installed?

Reply

davetolnai
0

I don't really remember.  Likely with whatever bleed block came with the brakes.  It shouldn't matter that much though.  Pads/pistons are fully seated and they don't move when the bleed port is open, so this shouldn't be critical.

Here is the full Slate Evo review.  I think I compared them to the SLX brake in there.

https://nsmb.com/articles/trp-slate-evo-brakes-reviewed/

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.