CQ_Steadyracks-12
REVIEW

Get your bikes off the floor: Steadyracks

Photos Cooper Quinn
Reading time

A few months back, I asked the internet a question. I know, sometimes I like to live perhaps too dangerously, but I needed to crowdsource some information for the ongoing (and never-ending) garage organization project. And I wanted to get some bikes off the floor.

Fortunately, Avery still only has one, but between personal bikes, review bikes, her bikes, and cargo bikes, there's quite a few bikes in the garage. Mountain bikes generally get stored in a nook, hanging by the front axle with the wheel off - yes this is annoying to do, but it saves an enormous amount of space and they're not in use every single day. It's a fine compromise for the area saved and often times they go in the truck without a front wheel as well so it's no biggie.

But what about the Every Day Bikes? Bikes that get used to go to daycare, to the grocery store, and to work? Wheels on and off would be intolerable that often, so they've been living on the floor in a DIY wooden stand that's functional but takes up a lot of valuable real estate and makes sweeping a pain. I knew I wanted to a mounting system that would get bikes off the floor, hold them vertically, and minimize the amount of floor space consumed. Ease of use was a high priority, along with not lifting things high.

So I did the dangerous thing, and asked Instagram stories with a poll. Out of a sea of responses and choices, nearly everyone who messaged with something overwhelmingly positive was talking about their Steadyrack(s). Sure there were other answers, but it was notable how positive everyone was about the Australian wall-hangers, and how many people were using the system.

CQ_Steadyracks-01

In what can only be a wild coincidence, Steadyracks was founded by David Steadman in Australia and has been selling products since 2009. Their racks also work in the Northern hemisphere.

Choices, Choices

While there are many SKUs on the Steadyracks website, and the now-Classic Range forced you to think about fenders, tire size, and weight, the release of the new ProFlex line simplifies the process to three options based around tire width: Narrow, Wide, and Fat. All racks are roughly the same design, with a front wheel cradle that supports your bike, and can swing from side to side while loaded. The racks fold away for space savings when not in use.

The Narrow version fits tires up to 2.1" (~50c), Wide will be the choice for most readers here fitting everything from 2.1" to 2.8", and Fat goes up to 5". ProFlex racks are rated up to 55 kilograms and should be capable of supporting most battery-powered bikes.

Launched alongside the ProFlex is the new GearMate, a modular and adjustable system to store your cycling accoutrements on the wall, too. GearMate attaches to the rack with the SteadySpine,* a piece that fits between the rack and the wall - it's included with the new ProFlex line, but backwards compatible with any of the previous racks if you're already an owner.


*Steadyracks really likes combining title-case words into odd amalgams.

CQ_Steadyracks-11

I went with two Narrow and one Wide. The Narrow racks typically hold my gravel bike (which is currently on the f*cking trainer, blech) and her flat-bar gravel bike (pictured). The Wide rack on looker's right is a spare that holds whatever bike it needs to at any given time, or sits free.

CQ_Steadyracks-19

I have two GearMates, but so far I've only used the pieces from one - there are a lot of different hangers in each box. Each ProFlex rack ships with the requisite SteadySpine to use the system.

Installation

A little while later, a few big boxes showed up in the mail; as it turns out Steadyracks had just launched an updated version of the rack, effectively the second major iteration in the company's history. As mentioned, I picked two Narrow and one Wide ProFlex racks, and two GearMates.

If you're comfortable finding studs in your wall, installation is dead simple. Find studs, mount on wall. There are four fasteners on the upper portion that bear load, and two on the small rests for your rear wheel. Steadyrack has some guidance on recommended spacing, heights, etc, but as usual I over-complicated and over-customized things for the specific use-case of each rack. If you're going for a clean installation in studs, you're also more likely to be constrained by their spacing than anything else. My racks are on 24" centers, because Canada can't pick a system of measurement.

Steadyracks ship with installation hardware, including for masonry/concrete installations however I opted for some of my own GRX fasteners to maintain some consistency through the garage.

Use

One of the biggest features Steadyracks touts, and that I heard on my initial Instagram stories poll, was simplicity. Steadyracks just work in a simple, intuitive way. Whether you're folding them up out of the way, chucking a bike in, or swinging things around, it all just works simply and effectively. Everything feels - dare I say it - Steady. There's no janky wibbles or wobbles, no noises, and everything feels tight and secure. Importantly, they're easy enough to use I can do it with one arm. Open the rack, rotate a bike vertical with help from the rear brake, bump it into the rack, and with a quick lift/roll motion towards the wall the front wheel is over the "SteadySaddle" and it's done. This would be much harder if I was using a system that required more bike stabilization during loading, or if it was a hanging system higher off the ground.

CQ_Steadyracks-08

Folded away, they're very tight against the wall.

CQ_Steadyracks-09

Unfolded, ready to receive. It's easiest to load bikes when the rack is perpendicular to the wall, but not required.

Once bikes are loaded, the action to swing them around is incredibly light, and it's a great way to save further floor space. At more extreme angles, you need to be wary of clattering pedals into the wall, and your rear wheel can slip out of the U-shaped rear tire bracket, but these are simple things to keep an eye on.

The Steadyracks are good, and because of that, I don't have much more to say. The Narrow option fits tires much bigger than 2.1", and you're going to struggle if you have very tight, full coverage fenders. The GearMate can also restrict the full range of motion, especially with larger items like helmets. Beyond that, it's a strong case of "it does what it says on the tin," and the Steadyracks just work. To my eye, the ProFlex range is a more aesthetically pleasing, but if you're looking to save a few hard-earned bucks (and not worried about the GearMate), the Classic Line is still available.

CQ_Steadyracks-18

If you get too close to the wall, you can bang pedals, and the GearMate system can restrict the last few degrees. In practice, this isn't an issue.

While mine haven't been folded in and out for years on end, I know a lot of folks with Classic Series racks and I've yet to hear a tale of woe. This gives me confidence in the product's longevity, but I'll update this piece if anything unexpected happens.

CQ_Steadyracks-12

Not how the racks are typically loaded, but my Dadcountry EVIL is the easiest bike for me to putter around on outside these days chasing the grom. I'm mentally ready to ride downhill bikes again, but it's going to be a while longer for my body.

Steadyracks ProFlex Rack: 170 CAD
Steadyracks Classic Range: 130 CAD
Steadyracks GearMate: 110 CAD

cooperquinn
Cooper Quinn

Elder millennial, size medium.

Reformed downhiller, now rides all the bikes.

Related Stories

Trending on NSMB

Comments

D_C_
+3 B1001 Bikes IslandLife

I have trouble stomaching the price. When you have 8 bikes to hang, that gets expensive.

Reply

IslandLife
+1 handsomedan

Check out Velocirax… I have 4 bikes on 2 sections of their system and could probably fit another 1 or 2 bikes. You could probably easily get away with buying 3 sections and fit 8 bikes, which would be much cheaper than 8 steady racks.

Reply

heckler
+2 Cooper Quinn Bikes

Cooper posts this what, 1 hour after I come from Home Depot with a stack of 2x3’s for our new rolling garage rack. 🤣

Reply

cooperquinn
0

I'm here to help.

Reply

heckler
+1 Jotegir

Please bring 100 screws, 2-1/2”, must be Robertson.

Reply

heckler
+3 HughJass Bikes IslandLife

Serious now. Are we talking $130 per bike to hang it?

Reply

IslandLife
+2 Cooper Quinn Jerry Willows

I was looking at these but went with the Velocirax version, cheaper and a Canadian company. Have 4 bikes and it works perfectly, loving it.

Reply

Flatted-again
+2 Cooper Quinn Kos

I just (literally just) finished setting up my family’s wall bike storage- two steady racks on the left and two lezyne hooks on the right next to the door. That way I can squeeze the two bikes on the left over to get the car in, and the bikes on the right won’t swing in front of the door

Reply

Smilingbear
+1 Cooper Quinn

I now have 4 SteadyRacks because I keep adding new bikes and need more racks.  They work great, highly recommended.  Being able to fold them sideways saves a lot of garage space.

Reply

kos
+1 Cooper Quinn

These are SO good. I've got six (I think) scattered around the garage and shop. So easy, so flexible. I can't imagine an easier way to store a bike upright, and the missus concurs. I've managed to buy all mine during some kind of "buy two, get a somewhat better price" events over the years.

Perhaps the only minor downvote is the end caps are a bit finicky, which has been addressed with the new version. Worth noting that the racks work fine and dandy without the endcaps, if you happen to butcher one.

Reply

mammal
+1 Cooper Quinn

For the applications involving a low-to-medium budget/lots of bikes/not a lot of space/easy access for every bike, I would highly recommend a sliding hook system based on the Gear-Blocks product. 

A little DIY involved, but it's very solid and convenient, and the bikes can be nested together very efficiently.

Reply

cooperquinn
+1 Kos

NSMB has reviewed a couple of sliding rail/hook type systems. I didn't want bikes hanging from the ceiling for a number of reasons, so it wasn't on my list of potential choices.

Reply

psyguy
0

I've used their racks for multiple years and have been very satisfied. I have limited space to work with and this design makes a world of difference for managing my gear room. I also use the Fat Rack and doubt there's a better way to store your fat bike. Instead of using the rear wheel holders, I stapled large pieces of cardboard to the wall to act as a scuff guard. This gives the bike much greater freedom for it's position while keeping the wall safe.

Reply

GrundleJ
0

Am I one of few with brake issues after hanging vertically?  It seems to be limited to shimano brakes, but my sample is only Shimano and Hope.  bleeding doesn't seem to make any difference or get any additional air out, and once horizontal for a few minutes and several pumps of the lever they go back to normal.  Maybe non issue?

Reply

MNKid
+2 Kos JW70

I experience that as well, and just pump the levers until braking power returns.

Reply

XXX_er
0

yeah i got that working on the bike upside down, also used to get it when the bike was carried on its side in the truck, I assume  cuz I never got all the air out, I just pump the lever

I have an old Manitou that will leak oil hung from the front wheel ok if  so i have to hang it from the back wheel

I'm just rocking the cheap hooks into 2x4's some of which I got from the dump fo free , I find the area under the bikes isnt really used but the area over the bikes can be a shelf at whatever height I want, also if the hooks are too high its hard to lift the bike to get the wheel in the hook especialy  the 

Eeb, but lower down I can run the bike up the wall to some extent, so i prefer to  go low

Reply

cooperquinn
0

Mountain bikes get stored wheel off, with a hook in a 2x4 with an overhanging shelf similar to what you describe. It's significantly less convenient, they're quite crammed together, but it works.

Reply

XXX_er
0

then i would have to do something with the wheels !

Reply

cooperquinn
+3 XXX_er Jotegir Andy Eunson

You've got bubbles somewhere, and moving the bike around is changing the local high-points in the system, putting them in problematic places.

Reply

tmoore
0

We've been intermixing imperial and metric for decades, not much of an issue really

Reply

XXX_er
+1 Andy Eunson

Lumber is a commodity which Canada has been cutting and shipping south for a very long time and so imperial measure isnt gona end any time soon

Reply

cooperquinn
0

No, it sure isn't going away. I just find it amusing, as Canadians are often such staunch defenders of the metric system, and yet so much day to day stuff still happens in imperial. 

FWIW, there are pros and cons to each system, so perhaps this is the best way after all.

Reply

XXX_er
0

maybe Trump will end this cuz america won't need to buy anything from Canada LOL !

if you tell me your car gets yada kms per 100kms it means nothing to me,  I gotta change it to MPG cuz I  just kept converting  I never really made the switch but it doesnt mean anything to me comapred to some old car

Reply

Bikes
0

Please name one pro of the imperial/US customary system.

Not saying we can just switch, but unclear of any actual positives to this system vs metric (besides people are used to it…which I guess is a “pro” in some fashion)

Reply

cooperquinn
+1 Kos

If you do a quick Google search, you'll find plenty of resources comparing and contrasting the systems, and there's pros and cons to each, but a lot boils down to divisibility, and ease of practical use. E.g. one foot is - roughly - the length of a foot, is divisible by 2,3, and 4, and is 1/3rd of a yard. 

What's easier to calculate in your head: 1/6th of a meter (16.667cm), or 1/6th of a yard (6")? Or what's half of 6 3/4" (3 3/8") or half of 17.15cm (8.575cm)? There's a lot of people smarter than me, but I find it easier to divide 6 by two, and double the denominator, than i to to try and do long-division through 17.15 in my head. 

Imperial/US Customary gets lost in unit conversations, but that's kinda because each system was developed to measure things in specific size ranges, and not to be swapped around; small things, medium things, big things. 5280 feet to a mile seems arbitrary, until you think about a mile as 1000 paces - which is perhaps more grounded for many people than a kilometer, which is 1000x one ten-millionth of the way from the equator to the north pole (or more recently, based on 1/299792458⁠ of a second, where the second is defined by a hyperfine transition frequency of caesium. Very scientific, perhaps not very relatable.). 

While water boiling at 212F and freezing at 32F might seem weird, it makes a lot more sense when you think about it for weather, where 0F is "pretty f-ing cold", and 100F is "pretty f-ing hot". Most weather on most of the world is between those two extremes most days, whereas the temperature water boils at isn't terribly relatable - its gonna burn your skin off well before it boils. 

There's no right or wrong answer, both systems have drawbacks.

Reply

Bikes
+1 Andy Eunson

What half of 3-31/32”?

What’s half of 10 cm?

What 5-13/32” minus 2-19/32”

What’s 13.73cm - 1.02cm?

17.15/2…171.5 breaks to 170…that’s 85.  1.5 is 0.75…85.75…8.575…easy.  Any measurement unit requires math

Temp?  Eh.  That’s just familiarity bias.  So are examples on familiarity (like step length

I use imperial.  And will contour but I’m not deluding myself to thinking it would be invented if metric came first and there is a reason for that

cooperquinn
+1 Blofeld

It's going to be a struggle to convince me the distance light travels relative to caesium atoms vibrating is more relatable than how far it is to take two steps, but it's clear there's no convincing you there's any merit to anything non-metric, so sure, I concede. You win.

andy-eunson
0

One pro. Familiarity. That’s it.

Reply

tmoore
0

This is far better than straight imperial, straight metric is probably best

Reply

SixZeroSixOne
0

> The racks fold away for space savings when not in use

Out of interest, why do these hangers "fold away"? 

I'm not sure of the need/use case for this. Presumably if the bike isn't in a hanger, you're outside riding it, so why would anyone care if the garage spaces isn't be maximized?

Reply

cooperquinn
+1 JW70

It's not a feature everyone will care about, sure. 

But, other people might use the garage while you're away cycling. :) 

Or if you're in a tight spot, maybe it's helpful to fold the rack away because you need that space to work on your bike. Or you're trying to get a couch through the space, or... who knows. Lotta scenarios, really. 

Or, you're like me, and just like to be able to put everything away neatly all the time. I don't fold the racks up every time I pull a bike out, but I will if the hanger is going to be empty for more than an hour or two. It just prevents people getting bonked in the head, my partner swinging her bike/rack into an adjacent one, etc.

Reply

XXX_er
0

I assume this is talking about a lot of bikes in a stand alone rack, IME if a bike is not hanging in the ceiling rack  there is nothing there

Reply

cooperquinn
0

Sure, but then you need a ceiling rack. Which I specifically didn't want.

Reply

Hayden.Cameron
0

My kids struggle to get their bike off the hook style wall racks. Has anyone had any experience with children and these racks? 8 to 10 year olds, riding 20" and 24" bikes.

Reply

kos
+1 Hayden.Cameron

Not kid-specific, but my 5’2” 105 pound wife (metric conversion left to the student) flat out LOVES using these.

But the key is setting up the height just right. For her bikes, I used the recommended “rear tire an inch or two off the floor” for easiest use. For mine, some are spaced a bit higher than that to allow for better handlebar overlap, leaf blower storage underneath, etc., etc..

Reply

cooperquinn
+1 Hayden.Cameron

I don't have any 20-24" bikes around... just 14" and 26". 26" works fine (it's the EVIL dirtjumper in those photos), I'd bet 24" would also work. 

14"....works... but not....well. It'd work better if it was rim brakes.

Reply

tristanf
0

Got 4 of these for the cost of one Steadyrack, have not yet installed so can't comment on quality and effectiveness yet.

https://www.amazon.ca/your-orders/pop?ref=ppx_yo2ov_mob_b_pop&orderId=702-3069610-4394613&lineItemId=jipomtpqoqloqmps&shipmentId=BxxWQ1ZHx&packageId=1&asin=B0D5CFCPQP

Reply

mammal
0

That's a link to "your Amazon orders" which others won't be able to access.

Reply

Andeh
0

I've been using Steady Racks a couple years now, ever since the quiver started getting out of control.  They're great, especially for heavier bikes like ebikes and my wife's steel townie.  I skip the lower plastic V thing, and set the top height so the tire is just a bit off the ground.

Reply

Kever
0

I think you can fit more bikes in the space with a velocirax. I have 4 steadyracks and there are interactions with handlebars and frames. Perhaps this is a up/down spacing issue. I will try installing them again but may sell and get a velocirax.

Reply

LC
0

Somewhat related question: any recommendations for floor bike racks?  I'll be moving to a new apartment in the next 6 months with an underground double garage (long & skinny) so floor space is not going to be an issue.  Planning on parking 4 bikes on the floor at the far wall so I can just wheel them out past the car or onto the rack.  Something like these racks to hold the rear wheel seems good for about €26 apiece, bolted to the floor or to a long piece of plywood if needed.  Some of our ski gondolas have this style inside them and they seem plenty solid.

Two pieces of 2x2" on the floor and the same on the wall for each bike's rear wheel might work OK for DIY but maybe not as stable or easy to rearrange.  Anything else I should look into?

Reply

cooperquinn
0

No, don't have much in the way of knowledge there. I'd be Google image searching "DIY 2x4 bike rack" and scrolling for ideas, and then cobbling something together specific to my space, probably.

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.