Fox Live Valve Neo 2
REVIEW

Fox Live Valve Neo

Photos Deniz Merdano
Reading time

About a month ago, Fox rolled out the Transfer Neo Wireless Dropper post. That Neo wireless protocol system had a lot of R&D behind it, so it shouldn't be a surprise to all that today Fox is unveiling Live Valve Neo. Fox Float X and DHX shock platforms now come with the option of being equipped with Live Valve Neo, which Fox says reads terrain inputs up to 400 times per second, and is capable of transmitting adjustments to your shock in 1/70th of a second from the time it decides it's time to party - or shut the party down if it's time to pedal.

Fox has been testing Live Valve Neo for the past three seasons on the EDR and WC DH circuits, so it's had a lot of time under some fast riders. And while racing is an obvious application for it, Fox also believes Live Valve Neo will be beneficial to trail riders as that is the first segment they're targeting.

Fox Live Valve Neo Rear sensor

Live Valve Neo's sensors bolt onto the front and rear brake calipers. Fox says they work with Shimano, SRAM, TRP, and Magura. Not sure if that means you're SOL if you run Hope, Hayes, or Trickstuff (tiniest violin for you, esquire).

Fox Live Valve Neo fork sensor

The sensors are deliberately placed in unsprung locations near both axles where they can measure pitch (front only) and bump force (front and rear).

Going Wireless

The Live Valve Neo system consists of a Neo-equipped shock + controller (at launch Fox is starting with the Float X and DHX platforms), the smartphone app, and two sensors which attach to your front and rear brake calipers. Although Neo is a radio wave protocol similar to Bluetooth, it was designed in-house for Fox's specific needs, making it both faster and more energy efficient than Bluetooth, which is hampered by its requirement to be compatible with so many different devices and a very different use case.

Sensors

The sensors are very deliberately placed in unsprung locations near your two axles*, and they work slightly differently from one another. The front sensor measures pitch (the angle of the terrain) and bump force experienced by the front tire, while the rear sensor simply measures bump force. The sensors read terrain 400 times per second but only send a signal to the controller when they determine the shock needs to be open. The sensors use CR2032 coin cell batteries and Fox says those should last a year, however just like the coin cell batteries that drive SRAM AXS controllers, that may be a conservative estimate depending on use and only time will tell.

Worth emphasizing here is that Live Valve Neo (LVN) only requires inputs from the two sensors, meaning an aftermarket install is just a shock and two sensors - much more viable than RockShox's Flight Attendant, which requires sensors placed in FA-equipped fork, shock, and cranks to make it work.

*FOX says their sensors are known to be compatible for mountain on Shimano (other than last gen Deore XT aka M8000), SRAM, TRP and Magura brakes.

Fox Live Valve Neo 4

Green means go. My Float X Live Valve Neo test shock, ready to rock. You can set the green LED to light up every time the shock is activated, or turn that off if you're not into projecting a TRON-like image.

Fox Live Valve Neo 5

Like a regular Float X, the Live Valve Neo version comes with Rebound (last pic), low-speed compression (blue) and firm mode adjustments (black lever). LSC and firm adjustments have separate valved reservoir circuits.

Controller

The sensors gather the data and, if certain conditions are met, they'll send a signal to the controller (which is attached to your shock) to tell it to open the compression circuit. The controller can be thought of like the functioning body of the operation (if you want to consider the app to be the brain). It has a battery attached to it, same as the one used on Transfer Neo, which powers the opening or firming of the compression circuit based on trail data received from the sensors. The decision to open or firm that circuit can be executed in 1/70th of a second - in other words, just as soon as the fork's sensor perceives rough or smooth terrain, the signal is sent to the shock so that your rear wheel is doing the right thing well before it makes contact with that square hit or, conversely, it firms up in time to help you start realizing better sprint or pedal efficiency.

nsmb-wallpaper-desk-august-24

My very first ride on the Fox Float X Live Valve Neo came on a Top of the World to Million Dollar lap during Crankworx. The adjustment period was instant, and that's the way it should be if the shock is working as intended.

Why no Fork Live Valve Neo?

This was an early question and Fox said that for trail and all-mountain riding, with its quick terrain changes, even 1/70th of a second response time may not be fast enough. Also, they felt that the main efficiencies that can be gained from this system are realized through the shock and that a firm fork has insignificant impact on efficiency, especially if you risk sacrificing performance in the open setting. I've rarely used a climb switch in recent years, and I definitely don't miss it.

How it Works

There are a few things about Live Valve Neo that are not intuitive, but Fox's reasoning makes sense. First of all, the system has two modes only: Firm and Open. There is no middle or Pedal position. Fox's reasoning for this is that the system is so fast and responsive that it really isn't necessary to skirt the middle ground. You may need a different tune or mode for certain ride conditions, but that's something you can control in the app. Otherwise - and here's the second part I initially found surprising - the system defaults to firm mode even when descending. This is to provide maximum performance and efficiency to the rider, without giving up control or comfort. And it wouldn't be possible if Neo wasn't so damn fast, but that system speed makes the whole thing work.

As I mentioned, the sensors transmit info to the controller only when it needs to open, because its default setting is firm/closed. That signal can be communicated in as little as one millisecond (Fox told us Bluetooth requires 200 milliseconds to transmit a signal). Lastly, rather than using a motor to open or firm the compression circuit, Fox went with a 2-position magnetic latching solenoid, because it is faster than a motor, and virtually silent.

If speed is sounding like a persistent theme here, that's for good reason. It's race-derived tech that relies on fast and accurate response times to work. Paradoxically, that also means it works well for non-racers, especially when you get back to that default firm/closed decision. Theoretically, a downhill racer could adjust those two modes to account for different compression tunes on a course, whereas a trail worker (weekend warrior or enduro racer alike) benefits from Fox's binary open/firm shock positions. However, it doesn't end there, and that makes this a good time to dig into the app...

FOX Bike app main screens

I'm just going to use a screen cap from Fox's presentation since it nicely captures the look of the Garage screen, your bike's system screen, and service tracking.

FOX Bike App

MTB component apps to date have not felt like the vanguard of development. In most cases they can feel a bit like an afterthought, starting out a little janky and getting better with time. In this case, Fox has done a pretty good job from the outset. I found it easy to navigate the FOX Bike app, connect components to it, and figure out what I needed from it. Most of it is what you'd expect, with screens that let you select different Neo-equipped bikes, navigate to components within each bike's systems, and adjust them accordingly.

The adjustments available to you are interesting. Fox starts you off with some defaults, and to be clear, the part you're tuning is the force threshold at which the system will go from firm to open mode. Those force thresholds can be adapted individually for each sensor, depending on whether that sensor perceives the bike is in flat terrain, climbing or descending. Want Neo to stay firm on flat terrain, regardless of bumps you man encounter, but want it to be quite soft on uphill and/or downhill terrain at the same time? You can do that. And beyond those six controls (flat, up, and down for both front and rear sensors) you can also input the bump sensitivity setting which tells the system whether you want it to respond to smaller bumps or larger ones.

Most people will put it in Fox's Standard tune and be happy with it - and that's what I've done so far. But the system comes with five standard tunes, and users can input their own custom tunes as well as share them or look up other riders' custom tunes. For example, Fox staff have developed a Shore tune that differs from Standard in that it has more sensitive breakaway thresholds in flat terrain - makes sense in an environment that begs for traction. There's also a Traction tune that was designed for the American Southwest 'where traction is hard to find'. YMMV and I need to do some more experimenting - test time is always scarce in late summer but that's about to change.

FOX Bike app Tune menu

FOX's Bike app tuning menu looks like this - you can keep three tunes active at once, in my case Open, Shore, and Standard.

FOX Bike app Standard Tune

The Standard tune is recommended as a starting point for most riders.

FOX Bike app Shore Tune

The Shore Tune has lower flat breakaway thresholds and a higher rear sensor threshold than the standard tune.

FOX Bike app Traction Tune

The Traction Tune has lower breakaway thresholds across the board as well as being tuned to be very sensitive to bumps - perfect for areas like the American Southwest that place a premium on traction.

Precision Mode

Everything above is just the beginning as far as the app goes. In Precision mode aka 'how to really mess things up, you clumsy dork' mode, you can tweak the tunes to a deeper level: climb and descent angles, coupled or decoupled (rear sensor only can open the shock), open/closed/live mode override, front and rear bump sensitivity thresholds, and open timers (how long the shock stays open based on sensor inputs before automatically closing again). The combinations are endless and for most users, probably not necessary at least in most scenarios. Tweaker's dream, though.

Riding Live Valve Neo

After attending a product talk on the new system during Crankworx in the middle of nowhere, since there is probably no mtb venue with more prying eyes than Whistler, the folks at Fox bolted a Float X Live Valve Neo onto my Trek Slash+. My first ride was a lap of Top of the World to Million Dollar. Not a white knuckle situation, but not exactly chill, either - you have to pay attention and not do something stupid, or you'll have one or more flat tires or worse, rake your bike across the alpine's sharp rocks and really damage something. So I was in focus mode for that ride. And, because of the way Live Valve Neo works - that is to say, really well and really subtly - it was hard at first to really feel what was going on. When I needed the shock to do shock-y things, it did. What it was hard to perceive at first was the efficiency the system was providing, even in chunky, technical, steep terrain. Where I would have thought the shock should be open ALL the time, it was (after I started working harder to perceive it) clearly firming up even for half second moments of smooth terrain in between big moves. At first I thought I was just having a good day on a bike that suited me, but as the rides piled up it became clear that the results were more consistent than my skills are capable of producing. Something was afoot.

As I experimented more, I realized that the system was in fact firming up my shock as my front wheel exited corners and perceived smooth sailing ahead. Small speed gain. In choppy sections, I'd go from having a solid platform to pump or pedal into if the front wheel wasn't being asked to do much, to the bike's plush 170mm of travel as soon as things got hairy and travel and traction became important. Small confidence gain. Because Live Valve Neo makes adjustments so quickly, the performance doesn't feel miraculous or drastic, it just happens right beneath you; but all those small events start to add up. The translation of all of that isn't raw speed or a (always) a conscious knowledge of what's happening. Rather, I simply feel like I have more comfort and capability in sections where I'd normally be fighting a little harder to overcome a firmer or softer setup in the conditions that don't favour it. Bits of speed and traction led to more control and comfort.

Live Valve Neo may have been most noticeable on technical climbs. Small areas of respite in between square-edged steps are suddenly places where a pedal stroke becomes more of a weapon - the system firms up enough to transfer some of your hard-fought effort into a bit more momentum and then opens again as soon as you need the traction to clear a few wet roots or chunky rocks. On a mid-powered ebike, climbing capability increased to be closer to a full-powered rig. On a regular bike, I'd speculate the impact might be even greater.

Fox Transfer Neo wireless dropper 2

Fox's new Transfer and Live Valve Neo componentry comes with a battery, cable, charger, and battery block.

A few FAQs

If batteries in either of the sensors or the controller dies, the system will default to open mode. There is no lever to engage the firm mode in that case. Controller battery life is stated at 15-20 hours of ride time (my battery has been near or over the high end of that estimate so far) and the coin cell batteries in the sensors are expected to last at least a year.

Fox is working on a handlebar remote that will allow users to switch between shock tunes without opening the app. This is obviously geared towards racers and not expected until 2025.

Float X Live Valve Neo will come in Factory (OEM and aftermarket) and Performance Elite (OEM only). DHX Live Valve Neo coil shocks will come in Factory only, OEM and aftermarket.

The app does not need to be running while you ride, nor at the start of your ride. The system wakes up automatically with motion, or if you press the on button on the controller. Once your system is set up, you don't technically need the app anymore, except for firmware updates, however it's useful for tracking service intervals or if you need to disconnect/reconnect or troubleshoot settings.

It's Early Days

This is not the next coming of rear suspension, just like the Transfer Neo is not the second coming of the dropper post. What it is, though, is an impressive display of technology with benefits that will be tangible for many racers and some others. The original Live Valve didn't make it to too many bike spec sheets, but I think Neo will be seen on more high end bike builds in future. By no means must you have it, but for those enamoured with technology and tweaking, it presents an interesting option for the well-wheeled.

Live Valve Neo Product Pricing - a complete system utilizes a Kit and Shock of the rider's choice:

Live Valve Neo Kit: $ 399 USD / $ 534.65 CAD / £449.99 GBP / € 499 EUR*           Fork and Rear Bump Sensors, Battery, Charger, Charger Cable

Live Valve Neo Float X MSRP: $ 999 US / $ 1399 CAD / £1119 GBP* / € 1299 EUR*
Live Valve Neo DHX MSRP: $ 949 US / $ 1269 CAD / £1099 GBP* / € 1249 EUR*

Spare/Replacement Product Pricing:

Neo Spare Battery MSRP: $79 USD / $106 CAD / £99.95 GBP* / €99 EUR*
Spare Charger and Cable MSRP: $49 USD / $69 CAD / £62.95 GBP* / €79 EUR*
*price includes VAT

For more on Fox Live Valve Neo, visit FOX's Official Website.

Related Stories

Trending on NSMB

Comments

Fat_Tony_NJ
+9 BarryW sospeedy paradox@Goet Timer FlipSide Jerry Willows Lynx . mwmanuel Hardlylikely

Is it OK to not really want anything that requires a battery on my bike? Other than a light I guess?

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
+7 BarryW Fat_Tony_NJ ClydeRide dhr999 Kos Mark Hardlylikely

It's totally ok. 

And I didn't write about the shock in this piece (I might add a few thoughts) but having ridden that new Float X on another new bike recently...man. A good shock still requires a good bike to really sing, but having ridden that shock on two good bikes now, I'm super impressed with it.

Reply

syncro
+3 Mammal Kos Hardlylikely

I want to give a shout out here to Pete (and all the NSMB team really) for their continued measured response when it comes to complaints/gripes about E on bikes (electrification).

Reply

BarryW
+4 phillyforester Joseph Crabtree Lynx . Tjaard Breeuwer Hardlylikely turd_alert

I think you're shouting across the huge divide that Pete is on the other side of. 

He's riding a motorized contrivance with all the electrical bits and bobs. You and me?  Let's keep to bicycles.

It's a good article Pete, and it's an interesting bit of technology. But as noted on the Pinkbike article it seems this should be all about giving us literal DH bike levels of descending with suspension designs that DON'T pedal well. But solving that with this type of tech. On bikes that already pedal quite well it seems . . . Like a bit of a waste.

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
+6 BarryW sospeedy ClydeRide dhr999 Kos Hardlylikely

This is race tech and 'tons of extra money to blow on my hobby' tech. Every time something like this comes out, there are invariably comments from people who seem to feel that they 'should' want this new stuff. It's the same with phones, cars, etc. But in a lot of cases, the brands are just saying 'hey, we developed this, here's what it can do, you decide if it's time to upgrade and whether this is the way you want to go'.

Fox has been all about racing and performance for a long time. Their OE strength far outstrips that, but it's the ethos that has always guided the company. Neo is just the latest in that vein. But I'll happily be the first to say that no, I definitely don't think this is necessary tech or even for most people, tech that'll make them enjoy riding more, unless their enjoyment is derived from going as fast as possible in certain circumstances - ie. serious XC and Enduro racers.

Reply

NickM
+1 Timer

To mirror a comment from the light-red-bike-site, 

"Who asked for this?"

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
+3 Lynx . Mammal Kos Hardlylikely Nick Meulemans

Racers. And they've been winning on it for a few years now.

Reply

NickM
+1 BarryW

I'm pretty sure racers were given these, not asking for them

Reply

Lynx
+3 Mammal Kos Hardlylikely

They may have been given them, but I'm fairly certain that they were asking for a while, because if you've ever listened to how many times they (XC racers) lock and unlock the suspension, your jaw would drop, it's crazy, so having something like this means one less big thing to not have to worry about. For DH, with how tight times are these days, every millisecond counts, so if your suspension can firm up on every smooth or pedally section e.g. Fort Williams motorway, you can gain not even 1/10ths but seconds.

Reply

mammal
+2 Kos Hardlylikely

DH racers are definitely asking for it, after seeing the competition gain from the technology. I've seen it mentioned in interviews.

Reply

craw
0

My guess is that all this stuff will become the norm eventually. Even I will end up on an ebike of some kind with wireless shifting, dropper and suspension controls. And I bet that stuff will be awesome and we'll wonder how we ever lived without it. 

But it also sounds like a troubleshooting nightmare and I can see that even after I embrace all this technology I'll still have a fully mechanical second bike because there will be times when I just can't be bothered to troubleshoot the technology and just want to roll out the door. 

That being said eventually it will all be as reliable as an iphone with limited faffing required. All brought to you by the company that couldn't consistently produce a reliable air shock.

Reply

BarryW
+5 paradox@Goet ClydeRide Joseph Crabtree Lynx . Hardlylikely

But why? As bikes work so wonderfully now why would you choose to have the electronics on your bike? Are you actually suggesting that non-electronic suspension, drivetrain, dropper won't be an option?

I don't see that future as a realistic reality. Far too many people love the beauty of the bicycle as completely human powered and able to be fixed on the side of the road, trail, etc.

Reply

mikeferrentino
+15 Pete Roggeman BarryW AJ Barlas sospeedy Cr4w Koelschejung ClydeRide Konrad Timer Joseph Crabtree Lynx . Tjaard Breeuwer Mammal Mike Riemer Hardlylikely

It's not as if electric guitars killed off acoustic guitars. Shitty analogy, and the phrase "acoustic bikes" makes me grind my teeth, but it's my hope that the techno-futurists can go about their merry business without murdering the cable/mechanical experience. I really don't want to face dystopia on a rigid one speed.

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
+7 Perry Schebel 4Runner1 AJ Barlas tmoore Lynx . dolface Mammal

Agreed. We also don't have to get all team electrons vs team metal shavings. Just...relax. It's technology. No industry is immune. Buy it, or don't. No one's coming for your cables.

*also agree that calling any bike acoustic (other than a 00s era Norco VPS) is just a lack of vocab.

Reply

chris_d
+5 Kos Sandy James Oates Fat_Tony_NJ Mike Ferrentino Mammal

How about a Slingshot?

Reply

mammal
+1 Mark

Monocoque VPS is DEFINITELY acoustic.

Reply

ReformedRoadie
+2 Lynx . Hardlylikely

Well we've already seen new bikes that are wireless shifting only.  So 'they' may not be coming for my cables, but 'they' are limiting my choices.

Reply

Lynx
+2 BarryW Hardlylikely

Only if you let them though RR, only if you let them. Support brands who aren't forcing you into tech you don't want, those who give you the features you want and none of the ones you don't ;-)

andy-eunson
+7 Lynx . Niels van Kampenhout mnihiser Tjaard Breeuwer Mark BarryW Hardlylikely

The irony of the "acoustic bike" term is that so called acoustic bikes make less noise than electric bikes. When my bikes become acoustic it means I need to service something. 

If we look at the auto industry as an example, we see them selling us more car. Certain major auto manufacturers have dropped their small efficient offerings recently "because they don’t sell". At the moment there are more simple bikes available but when you see the big S selling bikes that are transmission only with no cable routing….what does that look like? It’s a type of inflationary creep. Not just more costly but more complex to justify the cost increase. The ratio of added benefit to added cost in not proportional in a way that is beneficial to consumers.

Reply

Jotegir
+1 Andy Eunson

Well, maybe your acoustic bikes make less noise .....

Reply

andy-eunson
+1 Lynx .

Come see me. My shop is always open.

craw
+5 Mike Ferrentino Cooper Quinn dhr999 Mammal Hardlylikely

I think maybe you should read my comment again. I'm very clearly not suggesting any of that. I'm saying that at some point all of this new technology will be pretty well integrated and will offer some unique performance advantages that I will probably find intriguing. But all that comes with cost and risk and I'll likely always have a bike without it all as well because I like that better and probably always will.

Reply

syncro
+3 Cr4w Chris D Timer

@Cr4w 

Verschlimmbesserung

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
+4 Cr4w Konrad Lynx . Hardlylikely

I'll be the first to stick my hand up and say that yeah...that Slash+ has way too many fucking batteries on it. Usually not a big issue but there are certain pre-ride days where I have a bit of a sigh about it. I think technology is interesting, but I don't default to all tech is good tech. It is, however, our job to stay on top of it to some extent and report on what we perceive. So while I wouldn't willingly put that many batteries on a bike I owned, I'm still interested in how this stuff works, what it does to the ride experience, and what it means for future iterations of tech and bikes. And I completely understand when people don't find that to be their cup of tea.

The faff factor is absolutely minimal as far as troubleshooting goes for setup here. We'll see about long term performance. But from the original Di2 to gen 2 Di2, AXS, etc...I've had very minimal issues that required what I would call troubleshooting.

Charging on the other hand? That's requiring more and more thought, and not just in the bikes part of my life.

Reply

BarryW
+2 Joseph Crabtree Hardlylikely

I would be 100% more willing to try an electronic shock than probably any other electronic gizmo (GPS excepted) on my bike, but ONLY if it gave me incredible, low kickback, low anti-squat descending performance and pedalled decently. Right now it seems this is interesting and impressive technology but I'm not sure it does enough to justify it's existence on the recreational side. 

And Pete, you do hear the irony of you mildly bemoaning the batteries on your electric powered bike right? 😜

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
+1 BarryW

Of course I do, but charging the big battery is not a hard one to remember. It's the death by a thousand coin cell batteries (etc) that really start to bum me out.

Reply

craw
+1 Hardlylikely

At some point we'll have lighter solid state batteries. And maybe even all these electronics will achieve some level of integration so you don't have to worry about keeping 5+ batteries charged separately, which is a bit nuts.

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
+2 Cr4w Hardlylikely

Battery tech is getting interesting and saving weight, dropping bulk and gaining range are all great, especially in combination.

Slash+ has the RD plugged right into the main battery, so yeah, it's a start on integration. I do think that in general I prefer batteries to wires, though. But just to demonstrate the steel man argument (enforcing the opposing view as much as possible) I'll do a count to illustrate how absurd it can get:

  1. e-bike battery
  2. shift pod (coin cell)
  3. seat post pod (coin cell)
  4. Garmin (if you run one - I often do)
  5. Smartwatch (I use this more often than the bar mount computer)
  6. Front TyreWiz (coin cell)
  7. Rear TyreWiz (coin cell)
  8. Seat post
  9. Shock
  10. Front shock sensor
  11. Rear shock sensor
  12. R Derailleur plugged into ebike battery so we missed the dozen, cousin
  13. Oops, shit, don't forget that smart phone

That's not what I would run if it were my money or my choice. It also doesn't include two lights if night riding, nor the Aleck-equipped trail helmet from Smith I haven't written about yet that has a small battery in the safety sensor (fairly redundant if you wear or use a Garmin). I like having a smartwatch always, and most of them can call for help now if you allow them.

Reply

syncro
+12 BarryW Andy Eunson Pete Roggeman Konrad Timer Todd Hellinga Joseph Crabtree Cr4w Lynx . Jotegir Mammal Hardlylikely

Ahahahahhahahahhaahahaha.

What's kind of hilarious is in the interest of battery integration there'll be wires/cables running around to replace the on component batteries of electronic gadgets where one of the selling points was no longer having shift/lever cables running around cluttering up the bike.

lol

*insert pic of a snake eating it's own tail.

Reply

Lynx
+2 BarryW Hardlylikely

Pete, I'm as anti-battery on a bike as you can get, but I agree with you, this tech is interesting to say the least and something I "might" be willing to try. When we saw the Ohlins multi buttons on Loic and Finn's DH bikes, it peaked my interest and I said to myself, that's like the Push shock, has 2 tunes and you can change either with the push of a button and then the 3rd button is a lockout/firmer for both tunes. 

This I think would be damn interesting, having the ability to swap "tunes" on the fly without having to reach down to flip the switch, because let's be honest, a lot of the times it's damn inconvenient to downright dangerous to reach down for that flip switch on your shock.

Also like that the default mode is fully open, no anything to try and faff with if the battery dies or something else happens. Personally I wouldn't  mind a manual shock that I had a flip switch and a dial like these have to dial in exactly how hard it goes when I flip that switch.

Oh and you've got a bit of a spell/word check still to do on the piece, saw a few errors.

Reply

GB
0

Blue tooth bikes ? Lol.

Solid no . 

Someone getting into e biking with a fat credit card . Perfect .

Reply

Timer
0

No thanks. Huge price increase and lots of additional faff for subtle effects that might make me marginally faster. I’ll leave that for the sponsored racers and gadgeteers.

Reply

kos
0

Well, I’m old, and a just-paritally-reformed ex-racer, and my Float needs replacement (it’s fine, but two rebuilds then replacement is just my failsafe mode), and Fox makes the right size for my Top Fuel, so I’ll likely give this a whirl this winter.

The performance gain is part of it, but never again having to reach down and flip the shock lever is also a big plus for me.

Honestly, I’d probably happily take this and a mechanical XO1 drivetrain to my grave.

Reply

Lynx
+3 Mammal BarryW Kos

Kos, if I pay shipping will you ship me your old "dead" shock? Can't believe 2 rebuilds and you call it on a shock, that's like what, 2 maybe 3 years, with the price of good shocks these days that's crazy to me. 

If you've got the scratch though, yeah, not having to reach down to flip the switch (even a bar mounted, wireless remote) would be nice on an XC rig if you're still hammering the trails hard.

Reply

BarryW
0

That was exactly my thought Lynx. Two rebuilds means it's actually in perfect shape. 

But what do we know? Lol.

Reply

kos
0

You guys are probably right. To be fair, I’ve been at this a LONG time, and this “three and done” approach is probably now an inappropriate relic from the bad old early days of suspension.

When, I have to say, I proved it over and over again. :-)

Reply

Lynx
+1 Kos

I can kind of get that, old dog, new tricks and all :-D Once you kept the old stuff regularly serviced it was normally good, but that's also talking normal usage, not some Pro training how many hours a week and racing no matter the conditions. I will say that modern suspension is better in terms of dampening etc, but longevity once serviced properly/regularly hasn't increased or improved that much - talking 2010>

When I was riding like 8-10 hours a week on the MTB, I was doing basic service to my stuff at least 3 times a year, but then again dampers and everything was much simpler back then also.

Reply

XXX_er
-1 Kos Joseph Crabtree Hardlylikely

16 posts on batteries  and not one of them on the  shock

I think Bob Dylan just ignored all the wankers and kept playing his electric guitar

and I suggest you do also

Reply

syncro
+2 BarryW Lynx .

I think the pushback comes from the wave of electrification/batteryization that we've seen on bikes in the past 5yrs or so. I think if someone is in the market for a new shock, then this should definitely be in consideration, but it's about a 30-40% premium over a regular shock. Is the juice worth the squeeze?

Reply

pete@nsmb.com
0

Unlike gen 1 Live Valve and Flight Attendant, Live Valve Neo will be easy to set people up with for demo rides on their own bike.

Reply

syncro
0

Unfoirtunately being a money grouch I always tend to be a late adopter and need to see significant levels of improvement and reliability before I'm willing to part with my money. 

Notable exceptions include quality baked goods, steaks and gelato. All part of perfect meal I might add.

Reply

Please log in to leave a comment.