
Review
Easton EC90 ALX Wheelset
Being solidly North American (and not from Chicago), most of the time when I get a pizza it lies somewhere in the middle of the spectrum between deep-dish tomato pie and cracker-thin crust Neapolitan. It's just "pizza", with a relatively thin base crust, a moderate amount of sauce/toppings, and a pleasant crust that bulges out a bit but it wouldn't hold a hot dog.
If you're confused and feel like you're lost on a food blog, start here. The Coles Notes of it is that I'm using pizza as a metaphor for gravel wheels.
The Easton EC90 ALX wheelset attempts to be this middle 'za. Not too thin, yet maintaining some aero profiling without being too deep and uncomfortable, and a width that is modern without risk of being overly progressive.
If you're unfamiliar with Easton nomenclature, EC indicates they're carbon (EA is alloy), 90 indicates the lightest, high-end components, and the ALX suffix is derived from the original AX "Adventure Cross" components as a lighter, racier group.
Highlights
- 36mm depth and 24mm internal rim width
- Available in HG11 Road, Microspline, and XDR configurations
- 1,492g wheelset weight (listed)
- Optimized for tubeless tires ranging in size from 33-50c x 700c
- Centerlock brake rotor compatible – maximum 180mm
- Hookless rim design
- Sapim CX-Ray spokes, 24 front and rear
- Vault CL hubs with 6-degree engagement
- Lifetime Warranty - details here
- MSRP: 1,848 CAD / 1,398 USD

Hovering across the terrain. Photo: Easton/Nick Kupiak
Design & Installation
While there's some disdain online for "gravel" components, I will continue to argue that it is a genre unto itself, with a surprising (to some folks) amount of diversity and variety. And as the genre matures it's inevitable that components will evolve to meet the specific needs and desires of riders; someone doing 300 kilometer high-pace rides in Manitoba has different demands than a rider headed to Morocco for 3 weeks of off-road touring. This wheelset is geared more at the former; moderate aero profiling based around wide gravel tires, for those looking to go fast and maintain some modicum of comfort and keep weight down over a full-depth profile. This is similar in concept to other recently released wheelsets like Zipp's 303 XPLR, although the Zipp's dimensions are significantly wider and deeper.
These carefully sculpted rims surround Easton/Race Face's longstanding Vault hubs, with six degrees of engagement driven by three pawls attached to the hub and the drive ring on the freehub. Keeping weight down and compliance up are a paltry 24 straight-pull bladed spokes. While the Vault isn't my favourite mountain bike hub (the two-piece hub shell can be problematic), I have no concerns about it in lighter use cases (y'know...drop bars) and checking with a couple of different shops around town they haven't seen any issues. Basic maintenance on the Vaults is simple, and doesn't require proprietary tools. If you're looking for a full teardown on the six-pawl mountain bike Vault hub, Andrew has you covered.

The EC90 ALX looks shallower than 36mm to my eye - I chalk this up to the wider-than-road-wheel width making things differently proportioned. Photo: Easton/Nick Kupiak

Detailing and graphics are subtle, just the way I prefer. Photo: Easton/Nick Kupiak

The Vault hubs have been an Easton/Race Face staple for many years now. While the two-part hub shell can be problematic in some environments, they've been flawless in gravel.
Riding the EC90 ALXs
Wheelset experiences start when they come out of the box, and things started well. I've had two sets of tires on the hookless carbon rims, and fortunately both Specialized (38c) and Maxxis (45c) tires have gone on without issue, using just a floor pump. I've since had about 1,000 worry-free kilometres of riding on the hoops, across a wide variety of terrain and conditions.
Especially in the early days of carbon rims, countless wells of ink were spilled about rim compliance and ride feel. And while that still matters and there are plenty of rims out there that are way too stiff, by and large most major manufacturers have it figured out by now. I'm also a believer that tire carcass and pressure are a bigger factor for comfort and compliance. So while the Eastons ride firm, feel snappy and aren't overly punishing despite having some depth, anything less would be disappointing. The shallower profile is also significantly less susceptible to crosswinds than deeper rims, but sadly I don't have a Marginal Gains wind tunnel to test other aero claims.

For this review, the wheels spent about a thousand kilometres on my custom Landyatchz. I still love this bike so much, it's as close to a Forever Bike as I can currently imagine.
Durability
I'm good at checking tire pressure on my mountain bikes, putting a pump to both valve stems before every ride - the same cannot be said for my gravel bike. Between daycare and commute runs, I just forget. I'm in a hurry, it's early, I know I should just do it everyday, but maybe I checked yesterday, and that means it'll be all good and a waste of time today! This matters because it means I've done a great job testing the ALX rims for impact resistance, after pressures have slipped low without me noticing. I've smoked multiple rocks against front and rear rims with horrifying sounds, and had no damage to rims or tires.
Similarly, the Vault hubs have held up through an awful winter of salt, grime, and the inevitable near daily bike hosing. The six-degree engagement is plenty for drop bar applications, and a quick inspection shows the seals have been doing their job keeping the outside out.

While "gravel" is often a misnomer, the EC90 ALX wheels excel on Trad Grav, a term I've just coined to be obnoxious.
Conclusions
Everyone's demands from a wheelset are different, however the EC90 ALX fits my preferences quite well on paper. A fast, responsive wheelset built with moderately-sized gravel tires in mind, comfortable off-road, and enough aero chops to not feel like the brakes are on when you're really moving.
So has Easton nailed the marketing spiel and "struck a precise balance between rim depth and ride quality, with the goal of elevating gravel speed and experience"? I'd say these largely deliver on that promise. Sure, there are lighter wheels, deeper wheels, wider and narrower wheels... but some versatility is good, especially if you're dropping 1,848 CAD. Yes, they're built with the faster end of things in mind, but with a tire swap, I'd be equally happy racing these wheels or taking them on a bikepacking adventure. I believe these will remain my main wheelset for a while (with my We Are One Revives shod in 50c Ravagers as the aggressive terrain/bikepacking wheelset), and I'll update these pages if there are changes in that conclusion, or any issues with durability. etc.

When I put three different Maxxis gravel tires head to head to head, I used a variety of rim profiles to (try to) match use cases. The EC90 ALX lands somewhere between the We Are One Revive (left), and Bontrager Aeolus 49V (right), and is now my go-to wheelset.

Missed the corner, got the shot?

Comments
finbarr
4 weeks ago
It’s unfair of me, but I’ve had so many issues with the Raceface Trace hub that it’s put me off their hubs entirely. It kept failing for me on my mountain bike. I know the Vault is supposed to be much better, and gravel is generally going to be less demanding on hubs, but I’d rather pony up the $$$ for a DT hub and never think about my hub again.
Reply
Cooper Quinn
4 weeks ago
We're all guilty of things like that, don't worry. "I had a 1998 Giant, and it was terrible! All Giant bikes are terrible!"
As mentioned, I've had mixed results with the Vault's two-piece hubshell on mountain bikes, but I have basically zero concerns with it here, and shop anecdotal "data" seems to back that up.
Reply
Kenny
3 weeks, 6 days ago
I guess it's the deeper section aluminum - but I'll let my ignorance shine through yet again and ask anyways:
Is ~1500g for a 24mm wide, 24 spoke wheelset... good? At $1800 and change, you're close to the territory of some carbon 28 spoke xc wheelsets that would eat these wheels' lunch from a durability standpoint, at similar weight?
I assume it's the deep section/aero benefits?
Reply
Cooper Quinn
3 weeks, 6 days ago
1500g is pretty light, especially given the deeper profile that you note. Also worth noting that sub 1600g starts to get much harder to shed weight, and part of what you're paying for with carbon wheels is the comparative lack of maintenance. I've sold my truing stand, which I probably shouldn't have, but I need it so, so rarely anymore it was just collecting dust and taking up space.
I'm not entirely sure why you think the XC wheels would "eat these wheels' lunch from a durability standpoint", though. The bead and areas like that are going to be very similar in construction across the genres there.
Reply
Kenny
3 weeks, 6 days ago
I guess durability could be defined in different ways, but your mention of a truing stand is reflective of my thoughts there - I feel like even with similar build specs, pretty much any current carbon wheel is going to have a big edge when it comes to rim dings and bends.
The subject just happens to be on my mind as I'm shopping for light wheels for my forthcoming gravel-ish build and I'm considering several carbon wheelsets in the 1450g weight range at a similar price point (again except they're 30mm inner width and 28 spoke), so I was just surprised that narrower and less spokes wasn't saving much. But like you say it's sort-of diminishing returns around that weight, things don't get much lighter without getting into strange spoke materials and such (the newmen 30mm inner width, 28 spoke xc wheels with carbon spokes are 1250g and only a few hundred more than these, but nonmetal spokes for a bike that will spend time in the middle of nowhere creeps me out).
Reply
Jotegir
3 weeks, 4 days ago
$2000 retail for the Kovee pro, which is wider and lighter. 1385g mtb wheelset. I wonder if they do a 'pro' level gravel wheelset for similar pricing on a narrower profile?
Edit: they do not! 2.2 gravel tires anyone?
Reply
Cr4w
4 weeks ago
These actually seem pretty good but looking at any of the offerings from Easton/RF, Chris King, Reynolds or I9, WR1 is really making these wheels seem very expensive. Factor in the low $CAD and the fact that WR1 now offer Canadian-made P321 hubs as an option (for mountain wheels at least though it seems like they don't offer them for the Revive wheelset yet).
Reply
Cooper Quinn
4 weeks ago
We Are One is probably off a lot of gravel-folks radar screen (if they don't mountain bike as well); pricing out a set of comparable Revives saves ~$75 over these. I haven't tried any of the newer P321 hubs since they moved, but had good success with a couple sets a few years back. P321 makes gravel-sized hubs, so I'd assume that's a SKU/stocking decision by WR1, but dunno.
Reply
Cr4w
4 weeks ago
That's a bit of a miss for WR1 given how reasonably priced the Revive wheelset is compared to pretty much anything on offer from the Road/Gravel side of the equation. Especially since we are boycotting america now (lower case on purpose).
Reply
Pete Roggeman
4 weeks ago
That's on We Are One to sort out - they're in control of their own ad budgets and communications plan.
We have a lot of readers south of the border, for whom We Are One are not a very economical choice.
Life would be really boring if every wheel review started and ended with "this is not a We Are One product, so don't bother". Great product, great Canadian company, yes. Not the only choice, not by a long shot.
Reply
Cr4w
4 weeks ago
That's fair. Shipping on these Eastons is free within Canada and hey, horses for courses. Lots of people buy wheels for lots of different reasons.
Brand awareness aside the WR1 are cheaper than these Eastors for Canadians or Americans when you factor the cost of shipping and currency exchange. How do you mean they're a less economical choice?
Reply
Jerry Willows
4 weeks ago
you know someone has too much money when they have different $2k wheelsets on a GRAVEL bike.
Reply
Cooper Quinn
4 weeks ago
I know, it's crazy to think there's people out there spending money to enjoy bicycles in a different way.
Reply
Jerry Willows
3 weeks, 6 days ago
Was just razzing. I like to make fun of the gravel.
Reply
Cooper Quinn
3 weeks, 6 days ago
Hadn't noticed.
Reply
Pete Roggeman
4 weeks ago
Maybe someone has too much time when they go out of their way to denigrate what other people choose to do with their money.
You're oddly conflating a reviewer's evaluation of one or more wheelsets with what a reader/rider's priorities may be - and then passing judgment on both, based on your own values and opinion of gravel riding. I'm not surprised you're salty, but I did think you were slightly better at objectivity.
Reply
Jerry Willows
3 weeks, 6 days ago
It was more I joke that apparently got lost in the crowd
Reply
Graham Driedger
4 weeks ago
Do you think wheel tech for gravel bikes is less than MTB tech?
Reply
Jerry Willows
3 weeks, 6 days ago
Yes
Reply
HMBA106
4 weeks ago
Cooper, I'm thinking of putting wheels with similar specs to these (24 spoke, 35mm deep, 25mm internal width) on an Ouroboros CR for XC/gravel. I'm hesitant about the deep rim profile. Is it very stiff/harsh for trail use? You touch on it here but I'm curious to hear more. You also mention the WR1 Revive's, maybe their shallow profile is a much better option? Those are also more $$$ so I'm trying to get of sense of how much of a difference there really is.
Reply
Cooper Quinn
4 weeks ago
I personally haven't noticed a huge difference in harshness with these - that said, I haven't done any controlled and/or blind testing so...
I wouldn't have any immediate qualms about putting these on an Ouroboros, but if you're going to be XC light....
Better question - what size tires are you going to run? I'd be thinking more about internal rim width than depth to narrow the search down.
Reply
HMBA106
3 weeks, 6 days ago
Cheers! Probably a 50c to 2.2” (gotta love mixing units). Feel like 25mm should be fine though?
Reply
Cooper Quinn
3 weeks, 6 days ago
25mm will be fine, wider wouldn't be bad. But a nice round profile can be handy on a gravel bike, depending on tire selection and surface types. (Nice way to keep draggy knobs off tarmac)
Reply
Cr4w
3 weeks, 6 days ago
Cooper, when is the deep profile Bontrager Aeolus the right tool for the job?
Reply
Cooper Quinn
3 weeks, 4 days ago
I rode the hell out of those things. They're sub-optimal on the bridges here if it's windy, but otherwise they're great. I ride a lot of..... mixed terrain rides and on gravel the generally isn't too rough (unless its some dumb short connector), so I don't really have any complaints about those wheels. I'll likely be putting them on an actual road bike, though.
Reply
Please log in to leave a comment.