Demystifying Fork Offset and Trail
Unkle Dave,
It’s winter and I’m snowed in so naturally I have too much time to ponder first world issues such as fork offset, the virtue of carbon rims, and how large to go for my front tire next season.
Anyway, I’m swapping out my 150mm Revelation (which came stock at 140mm) with 46mm offset for a 150mm Pike with 51mm offset on my 29er trail bike.
Axle to crown is about the same for each fork, but will I notice a handling difference due to the different offset? Is there anything I can do to negate any handling quirks due to the change such as installing an offset bushing or 160mm air shaft to slacken her out half a degree?
Sincerely yours,
Cabin Fever
Dear Cabfab:
I appreciate your question. Very occasionally, Uncle Dave feels the need to talk about something technical, such that he can maintain his bona fides as a “bicycle expert”. This simple geometry problem that you have presented is perfect. It seems complex, but a precocious child with a protractor and a steady hand could probably figure it out if you promised him or her enough Fruit Loops.
The first step is to plot out your stock bicycle as a base case. After swapping a few e-mails, we determined that your bicycle is a Specialized Enduro 29er. I assumed size Large. That gives us the following (with super, duper fancy Autocad screen caps):
Stock Specialized Stumpjumper 29er Large Wheelbase 1179mm BB Height 338mm Revelation 29er – 140mm – Axle to Crown 548mm Revelation 29er – Offset 46mm HA 67 degrees SA 74 degrees Trail 107.08 mmThe important number here is the trail measurement. Here is a pretty good explanation, but simply put, more trail means that a bike will be more stable and require more steering input to turn. Slackening your head angle increases trail and increasing your offset decreases trail. Make sense?
The next step was to see what the change in fork height did to your bike. That gives us the following:
Specialized Stumpjumper 29er Large – +10mm Fork Wheelbase 1182.9mm BB Height 341.4 mm Revelation 29er – 150mm – Axle to Crown 558mm Revelation 29er – Offset 46mm HA 66.6 degrees SA 73.6 degrees Trail 110.33 mmSo adding 10mm of travel slackened your bike out by almost (but not quite) a half degree, which increased your trail by a bit less than 3mm. As well, a few other things happened. Your seat tube angle slackened a corresponding amount, your BB raised a tiny bit, and your wheelbase got a bit longer. What does this all mean as to how your bike is going to handle? I have no idea, but I’m guessing it probably didn’t feel all that much different after you made that change. You’ve got things that make it more stable (longer wheelbase, more trail) and you’ve got things that make it a bit tippier (higher BB).
Our last step was to see what a change in offset would do for your bike. To minimize the number of variables, I kept the axle-to-crown identical, and only changed the offset (as we already showed what a change in axle-to-crown does). This gives us:
Specialized Stumpjumper 29er Large – +10mm Fork, +5mm Offset Wheelbase 1187.5mm BB Height 340.6mm 150mm – Axle to Crown 558mm 150mm 29er – Offset 51mm HA 66.6 degrees SA 73.6 degrees Trail 104.24 mmStrange things happen when you change your fork offset. The front end of your bike drops a tiny bit, but not enough to change the head or seat angle measurements appreciably (although your BB does drop a mm or so). As well, your wheelbase lengthens (a bit less than 5mm) and your trail shrinks (a bit more than 5mm). Compared to your base case you have less trail, more wheelbase and a higher bottom bracket. What does this mean? Beats the hell out of me. It’s interesting to see that a change in offset has a much larger impact on trail than one would intuitively assume. You’re probably looking at 20mm of additional travel or a full degree in head angle change to bring it back to where it was before you changed your offset, but that’s also going to take your BB quite a bit higher.
The amount of money required to “fix” all of this seems excessive. And each time you target something for a positive change, there’s inevitably some negative that creeps in as well. The offset bushings may help, but I think you should spend your money on beer instead.
Sorry,
Uncle Dave
Uncle Dave’s Music Club
I really need to start a list of what music I’ve talked about. I’m totally losing track. But I know that I’ve been meaning to talk about Parquet Courts for a long time, so I’m going to do that. If you’re not in to white kids playing weird music on guitars, please stop reading now.
Parquet Courts sort of came out of nowhere for me. I was listening to Light Up Gold a bit, and figured they’d be worth checking out when they swung through town. They seemed almost novelty-act-like at this point, but I left the house a lot more in those days, so it was no big deal. The majority of their set was the yet unreleased Sunbathing Animal and it was like a punch in the face. In these times of universal access to all music, it’s not very often that your first exposure to anything is live, so this felt pretty special. Anyhow, here are some songs.
“Human Performance” – Oh my god! Puppets! You have to watch this.
“Black and White” – Oh my shit, I love this song. I’m a sucker for a clean bass line.
“You’ve Got Me Wonderin’ Now” – This is a real toe-tapper.
“Sunbathing Animal” – With an actual sunbathing animal.
“Pretty Machines” – Also good.
“Berlin Got Blurry” – I think we linked this sucker already. But it’s real good.
And a bunch more with no videos.
“Uncast Shadow of a Northern Myth” – This feels really, really deep. Very beautiful and sad.
“Instant Disassembly” – For a while, it seemed like they were going to put a slow and sad song on each album.
“Master of my Craft” and “Yonder is Closer to the Heart” – These were the novelty act days, but I’ve come to re-assess them now that I know the band.
“Always Back in Town” – I don’t know. I just like it.
Cabfab – amid fierce competition you have won this week’s prize. You have won a pair of Race Face Chester Pedals. They serve up a nylon composite body, a fully serviceable sealed bearing and bushing system and chromo axles. And they only weigh 340 grams! Send us an email to claim your prize.
If you have a question for Uncle Dave (make it good!) send it here…
Crystal clear? Questions?
Comments
Brad_xyz
7 years, 8 months ago
Head tube angles are routinely posted but it seems that no bike manufacturers list trail numbers. I know you can calculate these relatively easily but has anyone seen a database anywhere that someone has already done this? It would be interesting to know the trail numbers of some of the top rated mountain bikes.
Reply
reformed roadie
7 years, 8 months ago
I'll just leave this here…
Reply
Dirk
7 years, 8 months ago
Ya, I've seen this article before. And we all know that more trail will add stability to a bike. The point I was trying to make is that you're not changing just the trail, and your change will have an impact on some other areas of your bike. If you just look at the trail numbers between the base case 140mm Revelation and the 150mm Pike, yes, it will probably be less stable. But your BB height and your wheelbase also changed so what does that mean? And what happens to your seat angle if you drop the rear end to compensate? Is that worth the trade-off? I can't provide the answer to that, but I can show some of the actual numbers that we're talking about.
Reply
Wacek Keepshack
7 years, 8 months ago
I find it hard to trust him, to be perfectly honest that suspension action got better by just mounting uppers with less offset. How come? If we focus solely on suspension action can get better if you adjust the head angle accordingly to the speed you ride, as the angle of most forces coming at the bike should match the head angle as closely as possible. Then the shorter the offset of the wheel axle to the plane of sliders, the smoother it will be, since the fork would work best if the axle was in line with sliders - That would mean some humongous CSU assembly. He got the fork serviced and setup properly, that's my guess… manufacturers increase offset because it allows for relatively good handling at a wider range of speeds. If you do it just with head angle with smaller offsets you have to be more precise whether you are bombing down Garbanzo or climbing a tight singletrack. Can't have both when you can't climb well. And most people can't since they are told to spin 90RPM out of the saddle at all times because some science.
Reply
reformed roadie
7 years, 8 months ago
I often wonder about the riding ability of people posting reviews on the interwebs…I know one writer, former editor for a major publication and he is a solid rider, but who can tell otherwise. And riding ability doesn't necessarily translate into quality analysis or writing. Some riders can shred regardless of bike or set-up, nor can they break down how they do it….they just do.
Reply
Brad_xyz
7 years, 8 months ago
I really wish someone in the mountain bike design industry with a scientific / engineering background would write a more in depth article about trail, head angle, bottom bracket height and maybe chain stay length and how they individually affect handling. I'm not sure how you could isolate these from each other in order to test them individually but it would make very interesting reading. I have a good general feel on how they affect high speed, straight line riding but not so much in other situations.
For example, what characteristic encourages your steering to flop one way during very slow, steep and tight technical switchbacks?
Is it one or more of these characteristics that make you have to ride "off the back" to get some bikes to turn while others need a more central or forward weight bias? Inquiring minds want to know!
Reply
natbrown
6 years ago
Hey, I know it's been a while. I've got a question for you. I've got scientific research (not physics) and graphic design backgrounds, and I've thought about creating an animation of bike geo with explanations. Do you think there's at least a niche interest out there for such a thing? I'm curious because it will be a load of work. I'd probably make it a community effort somehow, accept criticism, and refine the factual accuracy over time to keep it as a go-to resource.
While my background isn't related, I've read academic research papers on bike geo. I'd say the industry folks seem to approach things with a degree of knowledge (intended), but mostly experience and theory, which has been iterated through generations without any real scrutiny (or hard results). There is good data for trail actually, but the data indicate that trail doesn't seem so important to bike stability (how easy it is to turn) as is generally predicted. So...?
I think there are aspects to many geo variables and how they function on the trail that never get mentioned in the bike media. And I think there are two factors for that. I think the real audience for dry mechanistic detail isn't so big, as well as there simply not being a great level of understanding on this stuff. Systems are hard to understand, no question, but I don't think there's broad interest in making the effort to crack the system of The Bicycle.
Reply
Morgan Taylor
7 years, 8 months ago
How about those trail numbers at full compression?
Reply
Dirk
7 years, 8 months ago
Assuming the same amount of travel front and rear, it doesn't change.
Reply
Morgan Taylor
7 years, 8 months ago
Assuming front and rear ends always compress at the same rate, that is true.
Reply
Dirk
7 years, 8 months ago
I don't think my sub-par Autocad skills will allow me to compensate for various spring rates and differences in travel.
Reply
DJ
7 years, 8 months ago
Dave should tackle seat tube vs effective seat tube angles, especially for tall guys. (crouches in corner with tin foil hat)
Reply
Dirk
7 years, 8 months ago
It's difficult to discuss something that only exists in the imagination of the bike designer.
Reply
Niels van Kampenhout
7 years, 8 months ago
No imagination necessary, just math 😉
Reply
Dirk
7 years, 8 months ago
Sweet! They did it for me!
The original response I had typed out mumbled through some excuses about bike companies not providing enough information to properly figure this out. That's great the Canfield goes that far.
Reply
Jerry Willows
7 years, 8 months ago
The only angle that is relevant is the line from the bb to where the seat rail clamps at full extension.
Reply
Pete Roggeman
7 years, 8 months ago
If you pose the question in a clever way, maybe he'll answer it. Maybe you'll win a prize. Or maybe he'll mock you - who knows with Uncle Dave. But seriously: [email protected]
Reply
Wacek Keepshack
7 years, 8 months ago
Oh… I heard that discussion before…
Reply
Pete Roggeman
7 years, 8 months ago
Haha! Great one, Waki. I'm posting the image to save people from having to click through.
Reply
Wacek Keepshack
7 years, 8 months ago
Thank you guys for a warm welcome. Wow Pete, didn't know I can post pictures directly. That opens a sea of possibilities…
Perhaps I should move here and comment using hand drawings only. Especially that I deeply enjoy Uncle Dave's articles. He seems a bit like a functioning sociopath and I tend to stick to such people…
Reply
Pete Roggeman
7 years, 8 months ago
Uh-oh, Dave's going to be stewing over that one for weeks…
Love your illustrations, so please drop them on us in the form of comments - or whatever - whenever you like! For anyone else reading this, just look for the little icon to the left of the "Post as" box
Reply
Pete Roggeman
7 years, 8 months ago
Reply
whatyouthink
7 years, 8 months ago
I am so happy that Waki shows up in NSMB too.
Reply
Finn the antipodean
7 years, 8 months ago
I swapped a 55CR for a Lyrik on my Spitfire. Both 26″ (I know, luddite).
Same travel and A-C. The 55 had a 4mm bigger offset, and the handling was appreciably twitchier…
Reply
rvoi
7 years, 8 months ago
did you eventually switch back and have an equal perception of the increase in stability? wondering what the limit is if you pushed it on the other end… would 2-4 mm less further improve stability for this bike or would it instantly make it more difficult to maneuver? a creative tinker could fabricate micro horizontal sliding dropouts on a fork to explore the goldilocks range on different bikes. super geeky, but it could be done!
Reply
Finn the antipodean
7 years, 8 months ago
I did switch back to the Lyrik, and prefer the slower handling.
I tried playing with stem length to balance it out (35-50mm), which helped, but isn't the same kind of twitchy.
Currently setup with Lyrik (coil 170mm) and 50mm stem.
I'd like to see those sliding fork drops.
Reply
rvoi
7 years, 8 months ago
I am sure Waki could draw up the blueprints!
Reply
kontra
7 years, 8 months ago
you might fancy this one uncle dave
Reply
Please log in to leave a comment.