
Review
Arctos Epic 14.4 Lumbar Hydration Pack
Reviewing mountain biking products for 25 years, has changed the way I evaluate and choose civilian products for myself. It's made both pickier and more open-minded and willing to challenge my beliefs and tendencies. I have very little tolerance for poor design and attention to detail and even less for sloppy construction and execution. This has spilled over into every area where I am a consumer, from kitchenware to furniture or vehicles. I pore over consumer and professional reviews looking for patterns and, when possible, inspect things pretty closely before laying down my cash.
The process is different at work. When I'm testing gear, the product has either just been released or will be launched soon, so checking out what other people think isn't an option. I may not even see an image before it arrives. I also avoid looking at reviews when I'm writing about the gadget du jour to prevent other opinions from influencing mine.

I'll be able to put on a few pounds wearing this pack and still have waist strap room. About 150lbs I'd say.
The open-mindedness comes from being wrong many times. I was both a luddite and a curmudgeon before NSMB began and I was very resistant to change. I owned one full suspension bike before the year 2000 and it was also my first experience with disc brakes. If I didn't already have it, I was pretty sure I didn't need it or want it. The most embarrassing gaffe was my first exposure to a dropper post with the Gravity Dropper. "Why the hell would I need that" I reasoned, without much actual reasoning. I had a quick release and a telescopic post (a Titec Scoper) and we always stopped at the top of the winch before we plummeting anyway. Time has not been kind to that evaluation.
When I'm assessing test gear I want to know if it's useful, durable and functional, without downsides like bulk, weight and cost, but that's not where it ends in reality.

This pack looks just fine... From the front.
The discerning factor about which I might be a little sheepish, and one that you probably wouldn't guess if you've ever seen me on a bike, is whether or not it looks cool. Like it or not, we are all slaves to aesthetics to some degree. In fact, some of us signal how cool we are by trying not to look cool, which was how normcore began. For hairless apes, we are strangely complicated.
We may buy a car that's ugly but functional, but most of us, if we have the choice, would prefer a fine looking automobile. And the same goes for our bikes, helmets clothes and shoes. It's clear I'm less fussy about my riding partners.
I'm not saying I put a lot of thought into what jersey I'm pairing with the pants of the day. That's more of a pragmatic choice based on weather and laundry. I do however choose individual items, at least in part, by looking through my late-middled-aged mountain biker's aesthetic lens. Which leads me to this pack.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I believe you are beholding Ken Kienow, the founder of Arctos Packs. HIs pack looks to be very full, which doesn't help the overall impression. One nice thing about backpacks is that you never have to see the one you are wearing.
How Did We Get Here
Timing was fortuitous. I was trying to figure out how to carry water on the Santa Cruz Vala I have been testing, because the Bosch PowerMore booster battery was appropriating the bottle mounts. You are likely going to need more water if you plan to drain 850Wh worth of battery. I was done with backpacks trying to climb over my helmet and pass me on steep descents, and bum bags with lots of water are even worse, so I was at a loss. Water balloons in my pockets? An in tube reservoir somewhere on the bike? A water carrying follow drone?
As I was scratching my head, I received an email from Ken Kienow, the founder of Arctos Packs, a new pack company banking on the idea that the same pack should be versatile enough for short or long rides, and that it should be comfortable for either as well, even when fully packed.

The side pockets are large and have zippers to match for ease access, even from the saddle.
What is a "Lumbar Hydration Pack?"
We don't test all the gear that gets offered to us for many reasons; we may not have the right tester for a given widget, we may not think it's of interest to our readers, and sometimes nobody wants to test the thing in question. Had it not been for an urgent need on my part, I have the feeling that nobody would have put their hand up for this one; the Arctos Lumbar Hydration Pack. It turns out, a lumbar hydro pack is both a fanny pack* and a back pack. Or maybe a bum bag with straps. Or maybe it's a backpack with a lumbar strap and a low slung cargo area, and it may just be the best of both worlds. Whatever it's called, it looks to me like a Koala is hugging my ass when I'm wearing it,
*Just don't call it that in the U.K.

There is a whistle on the chest strap, webbing for anything you might want to attach, and a clip for the hydration hose. The strap can slide up or down where it attaches to each side to ensure a comfortable fit.

The crossed design keeps the straps firmly on my shoulders.
The Epic 14.4 Lumbar Hydration Pack
The pack has straps that come together on your back like a cross and a wide strap at the waist. There is a lot of excess length in the waist webbing, which I will eventually trim, so there should be enough for larger riders. The straps are well-vented and comfortable and they don't move around at all. The waist strap is wide and doesn't pinch or grab.

Lots of pockets. There is a total of five with lots of room and good accessibility.

There is actually a fifth pocket with no zipper for quick stowage and deployment. I guess it's a sleeve since there is no closure. It's shaped to keep contents inside.
Storage and Construction
The pockets are a little interesting. The side pockets aren't after thoughts, with each one having enough space for a light jacket and a pair of gloves, likely with room left over. These items can be accessed without removing the pack.
The largest pocket is shared with the hydration bladder and it has an oversized YKK zipper that runs 3/4 of the way around the pack for easy access. There is a sleeve to keep the bladder in place but I'd prefer to have the bladder in its own dedicated compartment particularly because this is where your largest items will be stored. There is a large, fleece-lined pocket for eyewear or a phone and another large pocket with top access for tools and clothing or anything else you might have. The tricky thing about this pocket is the small zipper opening at the top. It's a little awkward getting things in and out as a result. I did manage to put a very large pump in there though so I guess it's not too bad. Next time I'll put it in the hydration compartment. All in all they are good for an impressive 14.4 litres of capacity.
Everything feels very well made and is covered by the Arctos' Canadian-sounding "True North Guarantee", which states; "Our gear is made with the superuser in mind - the 'ride every day and put it away dirty and sweaty' type. However, if you damage your Arctos Packs product or it's defective, we will repair or replace it free of charge, forever - no fine print."

The side pockets are easily accessible and very large.
On the Trail
After trying the pack on the first time, it took very little time to adjust the straps so everything was comfortable. Once everything was loaded and cinched I discovered that, unlike either a backpack or a bum bag, the combo of straps meant I didn't need to reef on any of the straps. Pulling them until they were firm kept everything in place. This is actually what Arctos recommends as well; "The goal here is to get all of the weight on your hips and off your shoulders and back. When you're standing, the shoulder straps should be loose enough that you can lift them off your shoulders a couple inches."

It's nice to have the easy water access a hydration pack provides once again.
I didn't have too much gear to carry in the beginning. I packed a few tools to fix a flat, a multi-tool and about 600ml of water. packed like this, I would forget I was wearing a pack, until it was time to take a sip from the hose. It never gets in my way at all. I have since loaded it up a little more for a couple of cold night rides and it has continued to shine, staying securely in place and remaining entirely unobtrusive, except for the people who aren't wearing it.
It turns out this idea isn't entirely new. On a recent ride my friend Geoff Boeda showed up with Camelbak's version of the Arctos Epic; the Skyline. His was an old one but it's basically a hip pack with straps like this is, and he loves it. He was stoked to find a replacement bladder recently in the $5 bin at Obsession Bikes so he can keep using it.

Is it ugly or just goofy looking? Maybe a little of both, but I'm shelving my vanity here because the pack stays put so well and so comfortably. In terms of performance, there are no compromises wearing this pack. Fashion? You'll have to decide for yourself.
FEATURES (as outlined by Arctos)
- 14 liters of total storage, 4 liter hydration capacity.
- Low-profile lumbar design keeps the weight on your hips (and off your shoulders) and doesn't hit the back of your helmet while riding steep terrain or jumps.
- Industry-largest side pockets for easy one-handed access to ride essentials (phone, food, multi-tool, etc.) without removing the pack.
- Dual-purpose waist cinch secures the pack to your body and compresses pack contents for bounce-free descents.
- 3/4-zip large main compartment with separate area for hydration bladder makes stuffing oversize loads into the bottom of the pack easier.
- Top-zip secondary compartment for tool storage with divider. Large enough for high capacity MTB pumps and tubes.
- Low, wide, easy-fill hydration reservoir with quick-disconnect and large threaded opening makes for easy cleaning, adding ice, etc.
- Oversized, durable YKK zippers and 210D nylon construction meant to handle all the dirt, sweat, sun and neglect you can throw at it. Made in a top-shelf factory that also makes outdoor gear for first responders.
- 1.5" wide waist strap for less pressure on your stomach.
- Soft, protected, tech pocket for fragile/small items.
- Velcro webbing keepers to minimize flappy excess material.

The generously-sized bladder will take an impressive 4 litres of water. It has a large opening for ice or to keep beer warm along with your water.
In the End
I had become so annoyed by the choice between bum bag and backpack for bigger rides I'd begun strapping things in goofy places on my bike instead. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't and I was at a loss about what to do when I need to pack a larger amount of gear for some rides. It feels great to now have a solution that works well for short or long rides, which was something I had entirely given up on. If, like me, you have a hard time finding a pat that is comfortable and doesn't compromise your riding performance, this might be the ticket.
It feels almost miraculous to now have access to a pack that is so comfortable, even when loaded with a reasonable amount of gear, that I forget I'm wearing it. Nobody around is likely to forget, because of the way it looks, but to my eyes, when I'm in the saddle looking at the trail ahead, it looks just fine. I love this pack.
The Arctos Epic 4.4 is available now for 175 USD. A smaller model, the Epic 10.3 will be available soon.
Comments
Sethimus
3 weeks, 1 day ago
the things ppl do to „not wearing“ a backpack, lol
#pregnantontherear
Reply
Jotegir
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Meh, different strokes of course, but I have a very tall friend who can't ride with a backpack in his preferred pedaling position for anything over 30 minutes because of spine problems. This would probably sort him.
Reply
XXX_er
2 weeks, 4 days ago
when the designers have gone full " not wearing a back pack " where is there to go next ??
Reply
Mike Ferrentino
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Wingnut grappled with this kind of pack and public acceptance thereof about a decade ago. Osprey and Mountainsmith also had some notable attempts at fortified bum bags that didn't quite address the issues as well as this does. For the skeptics, don't knock it until you try it. I've been a fan of long strap backpacks with real-deal waist straps that allow me to run the pack on my hips rather than hang it off my shoulders for decades. It makes a huge difference in both the comfort and the total load bearing ability.
Reply
ChrisW
2 weeks, 5 days ago
I used the Mountainsmith one. It was a sales sample. Can’t remember if the buying group I worked for at the time ever ordered any (was 25 years ago???). Or what I did with the one I acquired. Was comfortable to bike with and held everything I thought I needed at time (tubes, lots of tubes). I do remember I did need the chest strap or the shoulder straps tended to fall off my shoulders. The back cross on this one probably helps with that.
Reply
Cr4w
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Am I the only one who has a pack that fits well and stays in place? To be fair in the time that I've owned this Osprey Raptor 14 I've tried at least six other traditional and hip packs and none of them have worked well so I guess I just got lucky.
Reply
Mike Ferrentino
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Osprey do it pretty damn well, and most of their packs have waist straps that actually function, as opposed to a thin piece of webbing that feels like it is trying to cut me in half. Deuter are also up there in the pack-fit hall of awesomeness.
Reply
Cr4w
3 weeks, 1 day ago
I'm going to try this one next. I can get away with less of everything plus I want a nice way to carry my phone that's not in my pocket or in the pack.
https://evocsports.ca/products/hydro-pro-1-5-1-5l-bladder?variant=42491668529393
Reply
Deniz Merdano
3 weeks, 1 day ago
We may have done a similar one
Reply
Cr4w
3 weeks ago
I believe this is where I got the idea from! These small Evocs looks like the perfect solution for how I realistically ride 90% of the time and I'll have the 14L for bigger days.
Reply
Sethimus
2 weeks, 6 days ago
do you put on a back protector vest then or do you ride without protection?
Squint
2 weeks, 6 days ago
I have a 1.5L Camelback vest pack, it is ideal for me in those 90% rides like you say. Switch back to my bigger pack for winter when I might be carrying layers, or longer rides needing more water.
Onawalk
3 weeks ago
I have the same, I've had the damn thing for 12 years I think. moving to a much warmer climate has made me detest wearing a backpack.
Bum bags, cause of my aversion to squats, slide right over my pancake ass, and wind up around my seatpost and knees!
thinking about a bum bag with suspenders.......
Reply
Skooks
2 weeks, 6 days ago
I have the osprey raptor as well, and it's a great pack. Super comfortable and functional. I wonder if all the people who don't like packs have tried one that is well designed like the osprey. I wear a small Fanny pack for short rides in the summer, but for most of my riding the Raptor is my go-to pack.
Reply
Ride.DMC
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Looks like the worst of both worlds to me!
Reply
Cam McRae
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Looks!
That was my fear. In reality, for me, it has been the best. For very small loads, without water, I will likely still use a bum bag, and short of an over night, this will be it. This version works fine with light loads as well though.
Most of the time, I’ll ride pack free.
Reply
Ride.DMC
2 weeks, 5 days ago
I have a bum bag that I don't like to wear very much either. I don't have much in the way of hips so it just feels like the bum bag is gradually sliding its way down to my ankles.
I realize this bag would help with that but I have a small, lightweight Osprey pack that i use for marathon training that is very unobtrusive. If I am planning a big day on the bike I reach for that.
Reply
Andy Eunson
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Packs are a funny thing and myths abound about packs. One thing is true, wearing no pack is always more comfortable than wearing a pack. But packs make me sweat. No. Going hard makes you sweat. So the real question is how do I carry the water and stuff I need comfortably and efficiently. I’ve used various bum bags for years for xc skiing and riding. I have concluded that they work fine if they don’t have to carry too much weight. Add a bladder and they suck. Bladders have always meant pack for me. Many packs are tall narrow and deep and feel like a sausage rolling across my back. I have an Acre Hauser that is wide and flat. Less movement. My USWE is very good too but small.
I don’t care for loading the bike with lots of bags and stuff as that can make the bike handle poorly or at least differently and I don’t care for that.
The subject bag looks amazing for bigger storage needs. I seem to recall that you see similar packs used by armed forces. These types of bum bags with shoulder straps is not a new idea as someone pointed out. Been around for decades. The real objection people have is looks. We are such slaves to fashion. We should always be slaves to function first.
Reply
Flatted-again
3 weeks, 1 day ago
I’m kinda curious about how much weight on the bike is enough for you to notice. If I’m thinking about what I normally have in a hip pack, I’m not sure I’d notice that on a bike (but then again, my bike is 38 lbs, so a bit more isn’t that noticeable. Also, I already carry water, pump, and tool on the bike and not in a pack, so that might be a difference)
Reply
Andy Eunson
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Hard to say. Back in the day, a Blackburn mountain rack was almost mandatory. I could tell when I had 12 beer on the rack. Or panniers for camping. Ugh. A two litre container of milk on the rear rack on my old commuter road bike made it handle weird. Many of us anlso had large seat bags like the Carradice canvas ones. Carried a lot. Crammed full you could feel it when you stood up the sprint. All I carry is a water bottle and tube plus pump and tools on the bike. Where the weight is carried makes a difference. Frame bags that fit within the front triangle might be ok. Those popular long things that stick way back off the seat look like they’d suck as much as those Carradice bags.
Reply
Endurimil
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Andy, first thing I thought of when saw was a civvy version of belt kit or LBE. Look up British Army PLCE kit as a great example. And to be honest good belt kit or webbing doesn't put all your shit at the back and gee put all the weight there. Which is kind of funny how Mountain Smith's version still does that.
Edit.. kind of looks like they copied the shoulder straps X crossing of off military chest rig set ups.
Reply
Ken Kienow
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Wildland firefighter packs were a big inspiration (Wolfpack Gear, Mystery Ranch, etc.)! Those guys carry so much weight for so long, and need to use their upper bodies while wearing the pack. They wear theirs SO low.
I hear ya on the function vs form part though. It's harder (IME) to make these look palatable to the general riding public than a more mainstream pack category (traditional backpack, waist pack, etc.). We're putting a little more thought into the curb appeal of the next models (10L and 6L) to work on this...while it would be nice if function were the only thing that mattered, form certainly does too, especially when it comes to first impressions and willingness to look more closely at a product.
Reply
XXX_er
3 weeks, 1 day ago
I still rock a 30L Dakine apex pretty much all the time, on an E-bike I don't notice the weight of a silky Big Boy or whatever is in the apex so I can clear any stem that doesn't need a stihl
I thot it could do some easy summer ski touring with the Apex but it didnt really carry the load of a pair of lotus 120's well and I realized I need the suspension of my usual 40L ski pack
and evertime I power up the bullit a kitten dies
Reply
Lynx .
3 weeks ago
You aren't wrong Cam, it is fairly on the fugly side of looks, can't lie there, but as you say, if it functions well, then you only have to look at it as you put it on, after that it's whomever is riding behind you that has the problem LOL. Friend has something similar I think from CB as well, think it's the Skyline, he loves it.
Can't say it doesn't look interesting, well thought out, like those big side pockets, easy to access, would easily hold a modern phone or P&S camera for those who like to take pics and snacks, multi tool etc in the other, but man that's a lot of dough to fork out for a curiosity, especially adding in the cost of shipping to the Caribbean, duties etc.
I have a CB hip pack, good for easy rides where I am not riding the Rigid or HT with bottles, but still need some water and some tools, other than that, yeah it sucks, although nice to not have your back covered here in the tropics.
One thing I like about a full on backpack style hydration pack is the coverage and protection it offers your back, I'm fairly certain that mine saved my back and possible serious injury when I had my big off and slammed, back first into some trees.
Reply
Sebov
3 weeks ago
That thing is so nerdy
I had it all: Evoc backpacks, hip bags, Camelbak Chase Vest… These days I strap on my spare tube, Dynaplug, CO2 Cartridge, Tire lever and pump to my frame (OneUp Pump with tool or Crankbrothers tool for the bottle cage and Specialzied Bandit tool mount for my Power saddles). I look like a wannabe Enduro rider from 2017 - just the Enduro Banana is missing. But I don‘t care. For a short after work ride it feels so good to be „free“.
Reply
Couch_Surfer
3 weeks ago
This thing is designed for guys that wear socks with sandals.
Reply
Peter Hansen
2 weeks, 6 days ago
Forget the pack, I want to know about this jersey with the falling rain style camo.
Reply
Cam McRae
2 weeks, 5 days ago
The jersey came from Enve components but I believe their clothing line has been discontinued.
Reply
brianbernard
2 weeks, 6 days ago
What's that jersey/shirt you're wearing? Love to see rain camo in the world
Reply
AndrewR
2 weeks, 5 days ago
It looks like a set of infantry (military) load carry pouches on a webbing belt but without the extra weight (and potential failure points) that modularity introduces and without the short cuts usually made by the lowest bidder.
It makes sense that it would work and seems really well designed as a way to have the required load support, minimising load movement during activity, with less back coverage (ie sweat creation) for the 5-15 kg range of loads/ weights.
As a multiday back country guide I find that the bike specific packs from Osprey, EVOC, POC and Dakine all do a good (to excellent) job if the user knows how to pack a pack correctly. The last time I had a pack hit me in the back of the head it was in my first season when I was riding with a hiking pack which ended up to tall for that "head up whilst arse is up descending a steep trail" body position (Deer Pass West) that a hiker only achieves by accident (and probably a horrible one at that!!).
Reply
Kos
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Cool concept. Never found a pack that I truly love. I’ll be very interested in the upcoming, smaller version.
Reply
Mark
3 weeks, 1 day ago
I can see this being an issue on steep trails and the rear wheel sucking that thing (and you) into the frame.
Thoughts?
Reply
Ken Kienow
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Maybe take this with a grain of salt as the guy making them, but one of the reasons behind the lumbar design was to keep a pack from hitting me in the back of the helmet on really steep, technical stuff. I have distinct unpleasant memories of a traditional backpack hitting the back of my helmet just as I was super focused on navigating a technical, high exposure, extremely vertical rocky roll, haha.
I haven't had the "sucked into the frame" issue as while the pack sits low, it's still not lower than my butt. Seems like if anything contacts the rear wheel, it's gonna be the bum first.
Reply
Mark
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Yeah, I've had the helmet issue too with regular packs and agree it's annoying. It's part of why I like my low profile USWE packs - they don't hit the helmet and they don't shift around. Although I know some people aren't fond of how snug they fit.
Thanks for the feedback on the pack not hitting the rear wheel. What got me thinking about it is that pick of you on the hardtail as the pack seems to be sitting fairly low.
Reply
4Runner1
3 weeks, 1 day ago
My USWE sorted my pack issues years ago. But yeah, the fit is snug.
Reply
Mark
3 weeks, 1 day ago
I find I notice it a bit when I first start off on a ride or if I take a brake, but once rolling it basically disappears, even in really rough sections. That's the beauty of it, nothing bouncing around.
The Arctos pack looks good too in the sense of not having anything bouncing around on your back due to its placement and strapping. If I wasn't already happy with my pack selection I'd consider picking one of these up.
Reply
4Runner1
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Very similar experience. I notice it when not in motion, which is the way it should be. I wore a camelback for years and it was the opposite, only feeling it bouncing around while riding. The camelback made for the better backpack for hiking, as it was more comfortable to wear while not on the bike.
DanL
3 weeks ago
I only close up the buckle on my USWEs when I'm descending or need zero movement, otherwise they stay nice and open.
A patriot 15 for big days, when I'm going to need a lot of kit or when I want a back protector insert and an airborne3 for smaller days. If it's a fast dadlap then an evoc fanny pack to hold my phone, glasses and multitool.
Reply
Cam McRae
3 weeks, 1 day ago
No issue at all for me on the steeps. It’s never even crossed my mind wearing it. A proviso is that I’ve exclusively been riding mullets while testing the pack (with 225-240mm posts though). I’m quite sure my ass would hit before the pack would as well.
Reply
Bikes
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Check out that picture again. That pack will not be lower than the lower crack/grundle which will hit first. Even if it did I’d think you’d need some strange contortions to have it do anything than make a light rubbing noise
Reply
Allen Lloyd
3 weeks, 1 day ago
A benefit of something like this is having more weight at your hips allows for a larger weight swing in bermed turns. I typically do not ride with a pack in bike parks, but a few times a year I need to ride with a big heavy bag to set race course. What I noticed was when packed correctly I could corner better with a pack full of gear than with nothing.
That said I absolutely hate these things when you get to steep technical trails, even a slight weight shift spooks me and that is the last thing I need on steep technical trails. I have thrown my pack to the bottom of a feature before to avoid any weight shifting issues.
Reply
Ken Kienow
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Same - can't stand pack contents flopping around on tech/jumps/steeps. That's the idea behind the "wing" pockets attaching to the part of the pack that's not against the body - it makes the waist belt not only cinch the waist tightness, but cinch the whole pack so that contents are always compressed and not shifting around, especially as you drain the bladder and the pack loses volume. Kind of a dual purpose waist cinch.
Reply
Frorider
3 weeks, 1 day ago
I’ve accumulated a range of carrying devices & it’s interesting (& amusing) to observe what drives Darwinian selection ;) over time. For me it’s about excessive sweating; of course some sweat is inevitable on a vigorous climb but when my lower back is covered it becomes excessive. The minimalist hip packs work well (for me) since they don’t cover that area much at all; my nicely designed (Osprey etc) large lumbar packs get used in winter only; the USWE pack works remarkably well for largish volume year round.
It’s similar to my forearms & clothing choices. It’s just one of those zones I need to keep uncovered or very lightly covered. YMMV.
The weird aesthetics of the reviewed pack don’t concern me one way or another. It’s just that it’s located in the worst zone on my body from a temp regulation perspective.
Reply
Thegearfilter
2 weeks, 4 days ago
Lumbar packs are awesome!
Nice work Ken!
I dove into this concept over a decade ago, prototyped and did proof of concept studies then Life led me in other directions.
I am stoked you have brought your design to market. Looking forward to receiving the epic 10.3 soon.
Reply
Wapti
3 days, 23 hours ago
I actually ordered one of the smaller packs on pre-order and Ken has been great and all the ball with things. He clearly cares about the product.
Reply
BarryW
3 weeks, 1 day ago
I'm always able to make it work with only a hip pack so this is a step too far in the style department even if it works.
Reply
Please log in to leave a comment.