2014 Intense Tracer T275 Carbon: Reviewed

Words Morgan Taylor
Photos Morgan Taylor and Kaz Yamamura
Date Mar 17, 2014

6” bikes are a hot market right now; you’d be hard pressed to find a company that isn’t pushing a new bike and claiming it’s the ideal Enduro machine. With so many options out there, the range of capabilities is equally broad. There are bikes that ride “small” and compromise descending for uphill efficiency, and there are bikes that ride “big” but punish you on the climbs.

Travel numbers don’t necessarily correlate to specific ride characteristics; some 140mm bikes ride big and some 170mm bikes ride small. The bottom line is that the efficient ones are far more efficient than their predecessors and the capable ones are far more capable than what came before. More and more we’re seeing 650B as the wheel size of choice.

Along with the evolution in suspension platforms over the past few years has come an equally big development in parts for this category. Single ring drivetrains have swept the mountain bike world by storm and plush-yet-light damper options are available for both ends of the bike. Great small bump compliance travel with good mid stroke damping support? You can get that. Climbing platforms that actually work for squishy bikes? You can get that too.

With this discussion as a backdrop, Intense has just introduced an all new 160mm travel, 27.5” wheel carbon bike. The Tracer T275C is not just a carbon version of the existing 27.5” Tracer, but an updated version of the 160mm platform. With product manager Chad Petersen doing spec and the company selling mostly-assembled completes rather than frame-plus-kits, Intense’s most recent model exemplifies what can happen when every single piece is hand picked and no corners are cut.


The 2014 Intense Tracer T275 is an all new design, not just a carbon version of the existing Tracer 27.5.

We received the Intense T275 at the NSMB offices in mid January with the chance to put some miles on it on our local loops before the official release date in mid March. While we usually approach long term tests as a two-part operation starting with a spec overview and product photos and following up with a platform review, but the couple months before pulling the curtain has allowed us to wrap those together in one piece.

Myself and Arthur Gaillot have both spent extensive time on the T275 since it arrived (read: we’ve been fighting over it and rejoicing when the other feels under the weather). With Arthur’s extensive knowledge of suspension setup through his Suspension Therapy business we felt confident we’d put the new Intense platform through the proper scrutiny. This article will be split into two parts: first, the product photos with frame details and spec overview, and following, our ride impressions.


The front of the top tube reflects a bit of Intense’s hand-built aluminum style, but the rest of the bike is all smooth carbon.

T275 Frame Details

While Intense’s carbon frames are not made in the USA, all of the aluminum pieces (links etc) are still machined at Intense’s Temecula, California factory and, naturally, the bikes are assembled there as well. Intense’s aluminum frames have a very unique aesthetic which is not as much present in the carbon bikes. With no welds or custom tube shapes to show off, the T275 comes off as a well-polished carbon bike as nice as any other out there.


Ye olde head badge, the only flames on this bike.


Attaching cables to frames is still an issue. This admittedly isn’t the cleanest execution, but it works.


Internal dropper post routing is standard.


Designed in the USA doesn’t have quite the same ring to it…


Intense has done a good job with clean, blocky graphics.


Carbon look foam pad chainstay protector looks good but was peeling up after a couple months use.


The rear 142mm through axle is very nicely done. It does require a tool to remove, but looks clean and functions well.


Intense is the only company to license Santa Cruz’s VPP technology.


This chainstay and the bridge connecting it to the seat stay are very sturdy, and reminiscent of Santa Cruz’s recent designs. It’s important to put a lot of material there.


A minor complaint of VPP bikes is the lower link gathers mud and debris which can’t be washed out without compressing the suspension.


That could be part of why both Intense and Santa Cruz put grease fittings on their lower links. Also of note, bearings all around.


With internally routed shift and brake cables, it’s surprising that the dropper post wasn’t sent through the down tube as well.


You can’t really argue with these looks.

The Spec

It’s rare that a bike comes out of the box with a build spec that we’re happy to ride here on the Shore. Tires, bar, and stem often get swapped out before we even put rubber to dirt. Other parts become question marks and sometimes we have to live with parts that don’t quite meet our expectations.

Our tester was Intense’s $6599 Pro build, the middle of three models between the $9999 Factory build with XX1 and RockShox and the $5999 Expert build with XT and Fox. With a SRAM X01 drivetrain, RockShox Pike, Stan’s wheels, Maxxis EXO TR tires, Shimano XT brakes and a RockShox Reverb, the Pro build leaves little to be desired.


The RockShox Monarch Plus is one of a number of piggybacked Enduro shocks on the market. Plush off the top with good mid stroke support, and three settings from wide open to pretty damn firm.


The RockShox Pike is the choice for OEM spec right now. While other manufacturers wait for decisions of years past to catch up, smaller makers like Intense can choose exactly what they want on their bikes.


Stan’s Flow EX rims on Stan’s hubs, wrapped in Maxxis High Roller II 2.3 EXO. Strong rims and good casings.


Cherry picking some favourites with XT brakes and a Reverb.


180mm rotors front and rear, and a look at the threaded end of the through axle.


And on the other side, SRAM’s X01 cassette.


Intense chose a 50mm stem and 740mm bar from Renthal. These might go well in the showroom but will probably be swapped for something bigger.

The Ride

As stated above, we took the opportunity to have both myself and Arthur Gaillot of Suspension Therapy ride the T275. It should be noted that in its stock configuration the cockpit was too small for both of us. I decided to keep the 50mm Renthal stem and swap the 740mm bar for a 780, while Arthur went to a 60mm stem and 780mm bar. Intense’s spec sheets don’t show a change to bar width for production models, and we would both prefer to see a wider bar and/or longer stem spec’d on the large bike – as well as an XL frame size?

Screen Shot 2014-03-16 at 10.41.13 PM

While the lack of an XL size is an issue for taller riders, the other numbers are spot on.

Arthur’s Thoughts

I have not been impressed with Intense’s trail bikes of the past few years. Although aesthetically pleasing the Carbine does not provide the ride quality I expect from this type of bike. Having not ridden, or taken interest in the aluminum Tracer 275 as a result (a 30+ lb six inch bike), I quickly jumped to conclusions and assumed that this carbon iteration was a mildly fresh take on the Carbine platform: same 6 inches of travel, designed around 27.5” wheels, and more important than ever it seems, Enduro added to the list of intended uses. Pretty much the same bike, still not impressed.

The mere few first feet of trail on the T275 had me questioning every preconception above. This bike rides differently than any Intense trail bike, from as far back as I can remember. First ride, and every one from there on was an attempt at making this bike feel unsettled. It became a personal challenge: what can I do to make this bike flinch, feel overwhelmed, or simply lose momentum without the use of brakes?


Going fast is something the T275 likes doing.

The Tracer just goes. It snaps forward under power with no help needed from the Monarch’s compression adjustment. This trait contributes to the Tracer’s ability to not get bogged down. It is constantly generating speed on the trail: out of corners, in rocky square-edged mayhem, through compressions littered with roots, through short punchy rises, the list goes on. The bike uses every little piece of slope, smooth or rough, to gain momentum. Actually most features on the trail create an opportunity for the Tracer to speed up.

I’m quite certain the bike scoffed at the occasional excessive braking, sensing obvious rider weakness and unfounded lack of commitment. What at first was a challenge to slow the bike down, quickly turned into the most fun I’ve had on a bike in a while. There’s something addictive about carrying more speed and being more comfortable on every trail you usually ride, at any skill level.


It also handles the steeps quite well.

My holds with the bike are few. Between fit, suspension, angles, finish, and overall how the darn thing rides, few bikes check all of my boxes, yet this one comes close. Having such minor complaints with a bike is very rare. The hardware store cable guides for the Reverb line are offensive to look at, especially considering most of the lines and housing are tucked away. At the very least, I’m hoping black bolts will be used for production.

My other complaint is one spoken from a rider over 6ft tall: we need an XL version of this bike. It’s almost scandalous making a bike this good in only three sizes. A longer stem and wider bar was a band-aid that helped me test the bike, but fit is not a compromise to make, ever, and especially not on a bike this good.


Rough or smooth, it doesn’t mind.

The Tracer is quiet and collected, settled, very hard to phase, while being completely in-tune with rider input. A bike that feels this quick, yet is this difficult to knock off line is rare. Intense has created a bike that is quite special, exceptional even. There used to be a time when few, if any bikes rode like an Intense. In the form of the Tracer, Intense has once again met the standard of bike upon which their reputation was built years ago. The new 2014 Tracer T275 is on a very short list of exceptional riding bikes.


A 66.5º head angle is in the right spot in this category.

Morgan’s Thoughts

My experience on the T275 was not as peachy as Arthur’s. While Arthur is very calculated about setting bikes up with particular sag numbers, I tend to take a more on-trail, experience based approach to setup. Since the same forks can be found on more than one bike, I start there. I set the fork close to my preferences from experience, adjust the rear end to feel balanced, and then make minor adjustments from there.

While the folks at Intense had suggested putting around 200 psi in the rear shock for my weight, I found the bike felt sluggish like this. I felt like I was blowing through the rear travel and not weighting the front end adequately, and it was a dog going uphill.The bike would sit deep enough into the travel to negate the relatively short rear end length,  205 psi still didn’t solve the issue. A bit more… and 210 ended up being my magic number. All of a sudden the bike came to life.


Finding peace with the T275’s rear end.

5 psi with the T275 was the difference between a bike I didn’t really like and one I was really jiving with. More lively, more poppy, quicker turning, ready to smash drops and gaps, and at the same time more efficient uphill (more on that below). The confidence that Arthur describes above was certainly there. When set up properly the T275 achieves a good balance of high speed stability and snappy handling.

I can’t say that I had as much of a love affair in my time with the T275 as Arthur did. While I got on nicely with its descending characteristics, I can’t say I loved it as a climber. I have come to really appreciate a bike that can be left in a single rear shock damper position for both climbing and descending (with exception of bikes that have a bar mounted remote shock lever).


A tight rear end helps for technical descents.

My reasoning for this, and it’s especially important on a race bike, is that at some point I inevitably forget to switch the shock for a descent. On an average ride this isn’t really an issue. You notice the rear end isn’t acting as it should, so you stop and switch the shock. If this was part of an Enduro segment, you’re either throwing away precious seconds by stopping or dealing with descending with the platform damper on. I rode the bike as was necessary, and that involved switching the shock between its three settings many times on rides.

This isn’t to say the bike won’t climb at all. When you’re on the pedals, chain tension induced anti-squat helps to keep the rear end taught. Like many long travel bikes, it does well on technical climb sections. Speed is your friend: stay on the power and the T275 will motor up just about anything.


And when you combine the playfulness with its high speed stability, the T275 makes for a great race candidate – if you’re willing to push it uphill.

However, the “big” feel of the bike is constantly there. Our large tester weighed in at 29 pounds which is not unreasonable, but over a day’s pedaling I just felt like the T275’s descending bias was obvious when it was going uphill, and the result was feeling more physically drained than if I was riding a more efficient climber.

I have to conclude by saying that for a race bike that needs to be pedaled between segments, I prefer one that is not quite as descending-biased as the T275 – but that is most definitely a personal preference. As a pedalable All Mountain bike, it does its job very well, and I could see this bike being popular with the average pedal-for-descent rider here on the Shore.

Last but not least, let Chris Kovarik’s signature drifts speak for themselves:

Check out the other T275 models on Intense’s new website HERE, and have a look at Morgan’s photo story from the Intense factory HERE.


Dan  - June 11, 2015, 8:51 p.m.

Thanks lads good review. so if you compared the tracer to a bronson which would be better for all day up and down ? Maybe the 10mm less and 5 deg steeper would be more versatile but would loose some of that downhill stability ?


Mark  - Feb. 20, 2015, 1:09 p.m.

Curious how tall the rider over 6ft was? I'm looking at ordering a 2015 model…but torn between a L and an XL. I'm 6'2″. What are your thoughts?


megrim  - March 17, 2014, 11:40 a.m.

Morgan, a couple of questions. 1st, nice jacket. Which model is it? I'm looking for a new riding jacket and I've heard great things from the Arc teryx ones. 2nd, is that 29 pounds with pedals? If so, that's pretty good for a set- up like that. I also had the same issue you had regarding the rear air pressure (mine was on a Carbine). Especially with a Fox CTD. I just mounted a CCDB air CS to it and that really seemed to make the bike shine. A lot more weight, but a lot less mid stroke wallow.

Great write up guys!


Morgan Taylor  - March 17, 2014, 1:46 p.m.

29.1 with the Deores, so XT or XTR would get it at an even 29. The Truvativ bar I was running is probably a touch heavier than the Renthal as well.

The jacket is a Beta FL, no longer available, but using the same Goretex Active material as the current Alpha FL and Tecto FL. No pit zips on these ones. I really liked my old Alpha SL as well.


stiksandstones  - March 17, 2014, 8:22 p.m.

His jacket matches the Blue Pintstripe Troy Lee A1 helmet, and that is all that matters-well, besides the safety factor! 🙂


Cr4w  - March 17, 2014, 8:13 a.m.

I wonder why they had to route the dropper line externally when the others were able to run inside the down tube?
Decent $10000 bike otherwise.


Rob Gretchen  - March 17, 2014, 7:18 a.m.

Quite the media blitz that Intense has orchestrated for this bike rollout. I appreciate the unbiased and candid NSMB review. I have a Carbine and while I agree to a point with Arthur's assessment I will state that changing to BOS suspension on mine really made the bike shine. This new Tracer carbon seems to take this genre to a higher level for Intense.


Please log in to leave a comment.